JusKeepBreathin 19,311 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
melodichard 3,769 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Good. Fox News doesn’t need to be legitimized. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pachinko 10,765 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 She has my vote. Indian American queen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edonis 28,974 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 She's been wooing me over recently. This statement certainly helps. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rumours 45,521 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 10 minutes ago, pachinko said: Indian American queen. Cnxnzmsmslslss Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HorusRa2 5,005 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Meh. It’s a wasted opportunity IMO. Fox News May be awful but it has the highest ratings & it is important to not allow those who watch Fox News to be exposed to only the right wing echo chamber. I understand & respect her decision but disagree with her as a matter of principle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarryTheAngel 551 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 In the end, it's not as if CNN and MSNBC are paragons of virtue. They might not be as outwardly terrible as Fox, but they're ultimately meant to create profit. I can understand her argument about reestablishing legitimacy for advertisers but it falls flat in the end for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skaxboy 7,066 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 19 minutes ago, MarryTheAngel said: In the end, it's not as if CNN and MSNBC are paragons of virtue. They might not be as outwardly terrible as Fox, but they're ultimately meant to create profit. I can understand her argument about reestablishing legitimacy for advertisers but it falls flat in the end for me. I think all channels are intended for profit. I understood it as a Fox News town hall would draw a bunch of advertisers because the Cult45 crowd would watch it and bring in ad revenue to fuel their hateful network. Those ad dollars would contribute to the pockets of the likes of Sean Hannity, Laura Ingram, and the shouting judge Jeanine Pirro. Bernie’s Fox town hall brought good ratings to Fox (2.5M viewers) and I’m sure the conservative executives were very pleased. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoverLoader 1,254 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 Talk about sabotaging your own campaign. What does she achieve by doing this? It isn't votes that she needs to win an election, that's for sure. It's interesting; when you work abroad and witness decent news outlets like the BBC in the UK and ABC in Australia, you understand how American news media is absolute garbage. Every single one of them. I cannot think of one network I trust in the states to give me a wide variety of news an facts only. Everything is basically sensationalist, biased trash. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 But you will go on other channels that are owned by the same people that own Fox News right? and you will go on TV channels that are owned by the military industrial complex that use propaganda to kill children and innocent people right? HYPOCRITE trying to act like shes tough Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Nook 37,820 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 drag ‘em Uh Red Wine... Convict... Gah Gah... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,909 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 57 minutes ago, MarryTheAngel said: In the end, it's not as if CNN and MSNBC are paragons of virtue. They might not be as outwardly terrible as Fox, but they're ultimately meant to create profit. I can understand her argument about reestablishing legitimacy for advertisers but it falls flat in the end for me. Fox News is propaganda, not a news agency. Completely different. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoful 13,304 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 1 hour ago, melodichard said: Good. Fox News doesn’t need to be legitimized. Fox News has the highest ratings overall and highest ratings in the key demographic of ages 22-50. I don’t think they need the approval of a woman who doesn’t stand a chance of winning the presidency and she is dooming herself. At least Fox is willing to host candidates from both sides of the aisle "My name is Dita, I'll be your Mistress tonight..." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris2 9,239 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 I red Diane Warren... her impact Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauvais 0 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 Good for her. Disrupting their advertising revenue has proven a highly effective way of literally cancelling these MFers. He did it to himself but just look at Bill O'Reilly live streaming his rants from his home office like a f*cking loser. 38 minutes ago, RoverLoader said: Talk about sabotaging your own campaign. What does she achieve by doing this? It isn't votes that she needs to win an election, that's for sure. It's interesting; when you work abroad and witness decent news outlets like the BBC in the UK and ABC in Australia, you understand how American news media is absolute garbage. Every single one of them. I cannot think of one network I trust in the states to give me a wide variety of news an facts only. Everything is basically sensationalist, biased trash. It's important to note BBC and ABC are nationalized public broadcasters. I just read an article today that brought up the fact BBC doesn't need to run ads (the authors argument was, therefore, they shouldn't) and my mind was lowkey blown (and I'm half-British!). Comparing BBC and our public broadcaster PBS is just depressing. I love my girl Judy Woodruff, but NewsHour is not it. I think print media is great in the social media age because I'm like 'I want to know everything and I will spend all day reading sh*t on my computer, thank you!' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.