Chickens in Malibu 7,873 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 @Ayria and @Melech being reminded of what a slippery slope argument is: Okay that's enough for today. Gotta go back to work. Don't waste too much on this pointless thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melech 9,900 Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, nicolasrumet said: @Ayria and @Melech being reminded of what a slippery slope argument is: Okay that's enough for today. Gotta go back to work. Don't waste too much on this pointless thread. How mature of you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, Ayria said: I mean I consider Jordan Chandler correctly identifying markings on Jackson’s genitalia (verified by Bill Dworin, lead investigator), Jordan Chandler’s claims of abuse being seen as valid by the leading authority on false allegations and Jackson owning “art books” of child nudity that were produced by known pedophiles as “valid evidence” but what do I know? LMAO.. this confirms you have no clue about the case - Jordan literally mistaken everything about MJs body. He even said MJ is circumcised and guess what he was wrong. ONLY thing he got right is the black mark above MJs gluteus but guess what.. His father gave MJ injections just below that black mark before accusing him. Those were art pieces and not some **** books but then again it seems like you know everything. Try harder next time love Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayria 463 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, ReginaGeorge said: LMAO.. this confirms you have no clue about the case - Jordan literally mistaken everything about MJs body. He even said MJ is circumcised and guess what he was wrong. ONLY thing he got right is the black mark above MJs gluteus but guess what.. His father gave MJ injections just below that black mark before accusing him. Those were art pieces and not some **** books but then again it seems like you know everything. Try harder next time love Where is the source for this circumcision claim? Or any of these claims? And the father gave him injections? Source? ☠️ Maybe if they are on a dusty bookshelf at your grandmas house they can be art books, but in the possession of someone who slept in the same bed as prepubescent boys it’s a huge red flag. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Hybrid 11,049 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 14 minutes ago, nicolasrumet said: Here's why. FCC regulations are administrative law. In other words, it is the law of the land. Such law is not enacted by the media. It's enacted by a governmental agency, and that is the FCC. Everyone explained what I said very well, so I’m just trying to understand your “logic” here. Are you saying the media is biased and believing in it without questioning is wrong (which I agree), but then all the government regulations are unbiased? So you’ve read someone’s book to structure your arguments decently, well done, you’re now a little less annoying to deal with than the common racist defenders on GagaDaily. But please don’t insult people as a defense mechanism just because they keep finding constant flaws in your “arguments”. Government is NEVER unbiased. Neither is the media. However, we can assume what he said in this interview are real. You assumed so as well, as far as I understand. And what he said was plainly racist. No family’s safe when I sashay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 4 minutes ago, Ayria said: Where is the source for this circumcision claim? Or any of these claims? And the father gave him injections? Source? ☠️ Maybe if they are on a dusty bookshelf at your grandmas house they can be art books, but in the possession of someone who slept in the same bed as prepubescent boys it’s a huge red flag. Google it. It’s everywhere. There’s even pics of what Jordan draw and everything he wrote about MJs penis. Read everything: https://www.google.com/amp/s/themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2016/12/26/did-jordan-chandlers-description-of-michael-jacksons-penis-match-the-photographs-taken-of-the-stars-genitalia-by-the-police/amp/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanetChromatica 2,266 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 So people are assuming that this random "recording" with no context means he was a racist? He could of been high on morphine and said that stuff and had no idea, we will never know. Can we please just let the man rest in his grave, arguing over whether a dead man was a racist and maybe even a pedophile is literally pointless. HE'S DEAD. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayria 463 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, ReginaGeorge said: Google it. It’s everywhere. There’s even pics of what Jordan draw and everything he wrote about MJs penis. Read everything: https://www.google.com/amp/s/themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2016/12/26/did-jordan-chandlers-description-of-michael-jacksons-penis-match-the-photographs-taken-of-the-stars-genitalia-by-the-police/amp/ A pro-MJ site? ☠️ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gimme More 35,360 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 so when people were backing up beyonce for her homophobic comments the other day saying it was in the past blah blah are now dragging MJ just because he's MJ?... okay the man is dead, let him rest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayria 463 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, Gimme More said: so when people were backing up beyonce for her homophobic comments the other day saying it was in the past blah blah are now dragging MJ just because he's MJ?... okay the man is dead, let him rest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
untitled 2,755 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 55 minutes ago, nicolasrumet said: Nice slippery slope. When I said that, what I meant is that what's used on TV is generally the standard of common decency in the eyes of the viewership. The Federal Communications Commission regulates what can be considered as indecent broadcasts (language or behavior etc..). The N-word for example falls under what's considered indecent. The K word doesn't. I'm kinda tired of arguing on these forums, because the amount of fallacies used in every post is rather tiring to keep track of. Learn to debate in an intellectual way. Here's a great book that can help you (it's not expensive): https://www.amazon.com/Critical-Thinking-Everyday-Argument-InfoTrac/dp/053460174X/ref=asc_df_053460174X/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312111868709&hvpos=1o2&hvnetw=g&hvrand=2904845927681987541&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9060317&hvtargid=pla-487631534573&psc=1 No. You say that people who use mainstream media as a source for proof, information or justification are "slaves to the media" while you also use television news and the guidelines regarding their appropriate language as a defense and justification. As in, you are quilty of the same behaviour that you shame others for. So the @A Hybrid's comment wasn't a slippery slope. It was actually more along the lines of a tu quoque fallacy, a special case of the ad hominem fallacy. You, an alleged law student, of anyone, should know this. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/11/Ad-Hominem-Tu-quoque (Also, this post isn't an attack against A Hybrid's comment. Just wanted to point out an incorrect claim made by nicolasrumet ) 💋 Lead Me to War With Your Brilliant Erection 🚬 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gimme More 35,360 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Ayria said: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustinTrudeau 2,419 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 ... Spoiler I personally think we need to spend more of our energy on current celebrities and their words, especially if they're alive. You guys are just criticizing him when he can't explain or defend himself (and no way am I saying he's 100% an angel but jesus christ). History is always up to interpretation, and everyone got their motives. Hate him, love him, he's dead. Guessing why or if he was what he was will not get us anywhere. These past threads are just exhausting, and a complete waste of time imo. But specific points like slurs should be applied to today's situation. I fell down the stairs once as an actor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evolve 571 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 Great, hopefully we never head about him ever again and his music disappears. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Ayria said: A pro-MJ site? ☠️ They used facts and they took both sides in consideration. I see you didn’t even read what I sent you so that speaks a lot about you. This discussion between me and you is done because I don’t do discussions with people who are not here for my argumentation. Do your research next time you claim you know suff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.