COTTON CANDY 0 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 It's her choice, get over it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memo 176 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 The fact is, that if you buy real fur, you are supporting the fur industry. There is no other way to word it. Why is Gaga hiding behind this "moral rigidity" excuse? I don't know she says that she sees "art" but if an "art" painting is made of human blood would it still be "art" for her? it's the same with the fur but with animals :( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VFD 57 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Very nice letter. Honest and respectful. While it might bring negative press, the motif of the letter has been stated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VFD 57 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 I don't know she says that she sees "art" but if an "art" painting is made of human blood would it still be "art" for her? it's the same with the fur but with animals :( Blood Piss Blues by Vinicius Quesada Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memo 176 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Blood Piss Blues by Vinicius Quesada So this is what Gaga is talking about, beautiful art but wrong "materials" (animal fur/human blood) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VFD 57 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 So this is what Gaga is talking about, beautiful art but wrong "materials" (animal fur/human blood) I do think she sees fashion (when linked to these issues) as her weakness. She acknowledges it isn't a right thing to do, but admires the beauty of it, in this case, the coat. There's nothing to worry about, though. She's not perfect, after all. Her good actions definitely outweigh her wrongdoings. :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Lam 597 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 The last sentence ! She nailed it ! Save your floor to make bread for the children who are hungry ! :giveup: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memo 176 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 I do think she sees fashion (when linked to these issues) as her weakness. She acknowledges it isn't a right thing to do, but admires the beauty of it, in this case, the coat. There's nothing to worry about, though. She's not perfect, after all. Her good actions definitely outweigh her wrongdoings. :) Well that's a good point and it's not like she's going to stand up for animal slaughter and fur clothes just because she bought 1 or 2 :P Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizzi 215 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 "And to campaigners, Save your flour to make bread for the children who are hungry. And Kim Kardashian is fabulous." I love her Very classy response :clap:I don't agree with her 100% though. I'm against fur... I just think about how people go and kill animals and skin them just so you can wear a fuzzy coat? Wouldn't faux fur do the same thing, but without killing animals? But if she wants to do it, its her decision. I bet she wouldn't kill Fozzi for a fur coat though... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIRE 75 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't really get what PETA's about. We're fukcing human beings, we survive off of food chains, so what's the big opposition is with fur? If we're already killing the animal, then why not use the fur? It's killing two birds with one stone. It's the circle of life. When one thing dies, something else lives. I feel like I'm missing something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VFD 57 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Well that's a good point and it's not like she's going to stand up for animal slaughter and fur clothes just because she bought 1 or 2 :P True. Even if she happens to buy more of them. Buying fur clothes does not translate directly to supporting animal slaughter. :yes: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagaforgaga2010 120 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Finally. This fur thing has gotten way out of hand. Fur has been around for forever. Glad to see someone not afraid to sport it out in public. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VFD 57 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't really get what PETA's about. We're fukcing human beings, we survive off of food chains, so what's the big opposition is with fur? If we're already killing the animal, then why not use the fur? It's killing two birds with one stone. It's the circle of life. When one thing dies, something else lives. I feel like I'm missing something. That the purpose is for vanity instead of a need. The fashion industry has also been accused of mistreating animals for fur extraction. However, similar accusations have been made against the food industry. I'm not that well informed on either subject, so I can't say any more. :sweat: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memo 176 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't really get what PETA's about. We're fukcing human beings, we survive off of food chains, so what's the big opposition is with fur? If we're already killing the animal, then why not use the fur? It's killing two birds with one stone. It's the circle of life. When one thing dies, something else lives. I feel like I'm missing something. It's different if you kill a "normal" animal like a pig or a chicken for food than if you kill an endangered species just for the fur. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIRE 75 Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 That the purpose is for vanity instead of a need. The fashion industry has also been accused of mistreating animals for fur extraction. However, similar accusations have been made against the food industry. I'm not that well informed on either subject, so I can't say any more. I get that. But the animal is already dead. What the fukc is a dead animal going to do with its fur. It's different if you kill a "normal" animal like a pig or a chicken for food than if you kill an endangered species just for the fur. Well I agree that it's different if you are only killing it for the fur. But if that b---h is already dead, use that **** up. :sweat: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.