Jump to content

Furgate - Gaga's response to fur allegations


Evanescence

Featured Posts

Oh okay, but what does that have to do with wearing fur/PETA, lol?

These incidents of flour-bombing is done by members of PETA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 285
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Rollercoaster

receipts? I saw no evidence of that in her post on littlemonsters.com. There are a number of pictures of her wearing fur over the last few years.

I find it ridiculous how some members of this fanbase becomes so deluded with their obsession with Lady Gaga that they are no longer capable to think rationally about issues.

"I have truly always stayed away from skinned fur," I thought was a hint that she truly always stayed away from skinned fur. Perhaps I'm reading into the blatant meaining of a sentence too much and it actually means "album in sockvember" or something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

gagaismywhore

These incidents of flour-bombing is done by members of PETA.

Really? Wow, that's pathetic :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hot Space

What about all of the clothes we wear that are made by children working in harsh conditions? We hardly ever hear about that....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rollercoaster

What about all of the clothes we wear that are made by children working in harsh conditions? We hardly ever hear about that....

Because they're cheap enough for high-horse-judgemental-scum to afford. Turn a blind eye when the masses can afford it. Jealousy talks loud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Monster_95

I am vegetarian and I do respect Gaga's wishes...well I will deal with them. After she released Furgate, I wrote a lettter to her on Little Monsters.com I'm not lying when I say I cried.....alot. Not because she wears fur(well abit) but because she tackled the situation well. PETA are idiots who don't think! Yeah....attacking someone is REALLY gonna get them to stop wearing fur. Good one PETA. I told Gaga in the letter than I am thankful for everything she has done for my confidence but my views are too strong to continue following her career. I just don't want my money to go towards her fur coat if she ever buys one (I don't believe the one she wore last was real). I will still listen to her music but I don't know if I will buy it, I will probably give money to the BTW foundation or another charity so im giving moneyy to her but im also not. I feel bad, I mean she deserves the money but I don't want that on my mind. I just don't think an animal should be worn for vanity. I don't mind an animal being killed for it's meat so leather is fine too. I just dont want to eat animals because I love them too much. Thats my decision and I don't want to push that on anyone else. But fur is a different story which you can research but it is too much to type. I am happy Gaga respects people who do things for animal rights and I said in the letter that I respect her for all of the anti-bullying campaigns she does! I don't want to blank Gaga outta my life because she means to much. I want to stay on GagaDaily forums and be excited for new music! I just hope she wears fur as little as possible and respects that people will get upset and respects that animals have feelings. I am happy she tries to stay away from skinned fur. I am not uneducated either. I put alot of time into researching animal rights so please don't generalize. I just wish, since I want to get into animal rights, Gaga would go anti-fur but you can't get everything in life but it is a challenge :hehe: . Emotional speech over :emo: Thanks everyone :hug:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evanescence

I swear to if I read one more comment regarding fans losing respect for her because she occasionally wears fur I'm going to go on a rampant killing spree. :creepflop:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mystique105

What a bull**** answer. Now she's got her make-up artist Tara over on Twitter posting the most outrageous right wing blog articles against PETA, and whining that PETA "attacked" Gaga, when all they did was write a heartfelt respectful letter. I could find as many ugly articles attacking her, her support of gay rights, and the BTW Foundation. You can prove any point with a google search - but are the articles accurate?

Hermes doesn't do fake; she sold out for a freebie fur coat. Trying to slime PETA puts her in league with ant-gay rights and anti anti-cruelty right wingers. The last place I expected to see her. She's got bull**** all over her shoes and it won't wipe off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mystique105

Every fur coat should come with a CD showing how it was made. You'd need a very strong stomach to get through it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

jhonyguy04

Every fur coat should come with a CD showing how it was made. You'd need a very strong stomach to get through it.

hmmm....your post history...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mystique105

This fanbase :smh: SHE WORE MEAT, FOR GOD SAKE!

And your point is??????

Cows are herded for food, while fur bearing animals are raised for the sole purpose of being made into coats, hats, etc. One is food, the other vanity.

Case in point. I bought a ratty used beaver coat for $30 back in the 70s. My cats ate meat, and loved to curl up on any warm, soft surfaces, but they were freaked out by that coat. They wouldn't jump on the bed if it was there, and they never went near it. The recognized what it was. I very soon threw it away.

This isn't about her right of choice for vanity's sake. This is about animals rights. They have no say about being skinned alive or being a--lly electrocuted to keep the pelts pristine to make a coat. No one has the right to torture animals to death to make clothing in this day and age. We are diminished as a species when we allow this cruelty to continue.

Absolutely shocking and disappointing coming from someone who I thought would really enlighten and lift up the youth of today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

jhonyguy04

And your point is??????

Cows are herded for food, while fur bearing animals are raised for the sole purpose of being made into coats, hats, etc. One is food, the other vanity.

Case in point. I bought a ratty used beaver coat for $30 back in the 70s. My cats ate meat, and loved to curl up on any warm, soft surfaces, but they were freaked out by that coat. They wouldn't jump on the bed if it was there, and they never went near it. The recognized what it was. I very soon threw it away.

This isn't about her right of choice for vanity's sake. This is about animals rights. They have no say about being skinned alive or being a--lly electrocuted to keep the pelts pristine to make a coat. No one has the right to torture animals to death to make clothing in this day and age. We are diminished as a species when we allow this cruelty to continue.

Absolutely shocking and disappointing coming from someone who I thought would really enlighten and lift up the youth of today.

Really, because according to your posts, her past TF/TFM work is better, and she should quit the preaching that BTW was. Funny, when you want to hate, you bend truth and opinions to fit your purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mystique105

hmmm....your post history...

Is that all you can say? Do you lack the ability to give a sensible response, or are you too busy blindly following your fearless leader into the sea?

Link to post
Share on other sites

lairofhk

Meh, this part kind of pisses me off: "You see a carcass, I see a museum pièce de résistance." I guess just the pretentious vibe of it is really unnecessary. Sometimes I worry her ego has become a little too inflated for her own good, but whatever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...