Jump to content
event

The 2018 VMAs ratings are in


TheAlpha

Featured Posts

ThisGuyTony

It's what they get for their awful marketing, boring nominees, and boring performers attending. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

music today is g a r b a g e. we are definitely in a music desert. nothing lasts and nothing hits. save us gaga. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Married the Night
1 hour ago, TheAlpha said:

We can blame MTV all we want. But at the end of the day, performers of today are not as exciting as they used to be.

Performers are still what they used to be. The VMA’s aren’t a big name draw anymore. So most of the good artists just skip it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nikola

Well that haopenes when your show is filled woth one album wonders

I've got an "F" and a "C" and I got a "K" too And the only thing that is missing is a bitch like "U"
Link to post
Share on other sites

Spartacus

:lmao:

When they allow the likes of Camilla win VOTY, you know the show is ****.  No one wants to watch that flop award show anymore.  I hope Gaga chooses never to return.

-𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐄 𝐄𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐌𝐀™
Link to post
Share on other sites

Spartacus
47 minutes ago, Scathach said:

That's false. The VMAs were watched by 4.9M viewers. 

Where did you read that?  And even at 4.9, it's still their lowest rated ever. :ohwell:

-𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐄 𝐄𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐌𝐀™
Link to post
Share on other sites

Scathach
3 minutes ago, Spartacus said:

Where did you read that?  And even at 4.9, it's still their lowest rated ever. :ohwell:

"Monday's show drew 2.25 million viewers and a 1.1 rating among adults 18-49. Across eight Viacom-owned channels, it drew 4.87 million viewers and a 2.2 in the demo; both sets of numbers fall short of the 2017 VMAs, which set the previous low.

The awards also aired on a ninth Viacom network, TV Land, for which numbers weren't immediately available. It's highly unlikely, however, that enough people tuned in there to push the VMAs past their 2017 on-air total of 5.36 million viewers and 2.6 rating in adults 18-49."

 

2.25 is MTV only. It's unfair to compare it to 2017's 5.36M viewers which is all 8 channels combined.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TheAlpha
53 minutes ago, Scathach said:

That's false. The VMAs were watched by 4.9M viewers. 

The show was watched by 4.87 million viewers across eight Viacom-owned channels.

You know this is just my opinion, right?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Scathach
Just now, TheAlpha said:

The show was watched by 4.87 million viewers across eight Viacom-owned channels.

Like I said above 2.25 is MTV only. It's unfair to compare it to 2017's 5.36M viewers which is all 8 channels combined.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TheAlpha
Just now, Scathach said:

Like I said above 2.25 is MTV only. It's unfair to compare it to 2017's 5.36M viewers which is all 8 channels combined.

Fixed.

You know this is just my opinion, right?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Spartacus
4 minutes ago, Scathach said:

"Monday's show drew 2.25 million viewers and a 1.1 rating among adults 18-49. Across eight Viacom-owned channels, it drew 4.87 million viewers and a 2.2 in the demo; both sets of numbers fall short of the 2017 VMAs, which set the previous low.

The awards also aired on a ninth Viacom network, TV Land, for which numbers weren't immediately available. It's highly unlikely, however, that enough people tuned in there to push the VMAs past their 2017 on-air total of 5.36 million viewers and 2.6 rating in adults 18-49."

 

2.25 is MTV only. It's unfair to compare it to 2017's 5.36M viewers which is all 8 channels combined.

Oh I see.

-𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐄 𝐄𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐌𝐀™
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...