Nicki Minaj for PAPER Magazine #BreakTheInternet

[chiuga 1,970]

that tongue is so unnecessary

[JDi 1,495]

one of those moments you catch yourself looking at a human being with the same contempt you look at hyenas giving up on the carrion and leaving in separate directions after 10 minutes of biting each other's butts

[sipthistea 21,099]

This is what I call ART POP. 

[Bizcochito 5,313]

I wish gaga would do a  paper mag spread.

[Guest]

for people who supposedly hate her so much some of you really are obsessed with her huh

 

[Sizzily 14,543]

[Runway 27,876]

Keep it

[zakariah 11,718]

I feel like i’ve seen all three looks before lmao, she’s so repetitive  

Also, the only reason why she’s still successful now is her sex appeal, once that goes away (with age i’m assuming), she’s basically over. 

[Trepadation 5,566]

I love it. The cover is a play on her name so its more tongue and cheek than "vulgar". It's a fun(ny) concept. And a constant reminder to love your self and that she never f wayne never f drake but if she did she'll let them eat her *butt* like a cupcakke .

[Jed 7,716]

come on Paper magazine you really tryna make that **** happen again

[Mikey Monster 1,561]

It’s so funny cuz I’m watching a documentary on rock n roll and they talked about how the album cover of John Lennon and yoko ono holding hands and showed their butts at the time the album cover was banned from the USA. Then I just saw this picture 😂😂😂 man how times have changed since then lmfao

[Glamourpuss 29,062]

Ewww that is hideous. I'm sorry but it's vulgar and grotesque to me. 

[T3ARS 4,132]

As someone who has a high tolerance for vulgarity, even this is too much for me

 

[Yanko 9,860]

5 hours ago, pedrohemg said:

Not sex. Vulgar. This woman is so ridiculous and unnecessary.

its not for fatherless white gays boo xxx 

[StrawberryBlond 14,820]

I never thought Kim's shoot would look classy next to this. This is just unspeakably vulgar. And I know that's the point but it's the kind of vulgar that might turn you off said celebrity, which isn't the point. Having your butt out is one thing but breasts are different, it's disgraceful that this should be on newsstands, unless they keep it under the counter. Young children see this kind of stuff in our culture and then we wonder why they become so over-sexualised so early? This trashy culture is ruining the lives of females who engage in it and ruining future generations perceptions of sexuality. The only silver lining is that there has been a lot of backlash to it with even straight guys saying that they're not into this, it's just too much. The media wants men to believe that "more is more," despite an overwhelming amount of men preferring "less is less" in many senses of the word. Above all, if people want to see p*rn, they can go elsewhere for that. To have it plastered on the front of magazines in public view is disgraceful.