TheKillerQueen 1,983 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 While Trump is addressing the horrible acts that occurred in Las Vegas and giving solace to the families and the nation, HIllary Clinton is using it as a political platform against the NRA... This is no time to be political, and there is no way to prevent things like this happening. It is easy to acquire assault guns and no law against guns is going to stop people from getting these weapons. Apparently the shooter was in the military and has PTSD. aside from that, this is a incredibly sad and horrible thing. It could happen to ANY of us, especially during concerts. Lace up my boots, throw on some leather and cruise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,655 Posted October 2, 2017 Author Share Posted October 2, 2017 12 minutes ago, TheKillerQueen said: While Trump is addressing the horrible acts that occurred in Las Vegas and giving solace to the families and the nation, HIllary Clinton is using it as a political platform against the NRA... This is no time to be political, and there is no way to prevent things like this happening. It is easy to acquire assault guns and no law against guns is going to stop people from getting these weapons. Apparently the shooter was in the military and has PTSD. aside from that, this is a incredibly sad and horrible thing. It could happen to ANY of us, especially during concerts. In 2012 America decided killing children wasn't enough to change the gun laws in this country. The debate ended there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 .... sick FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OliverViennese 1,164 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 On 2.10.2017 at 8:50 PM, TheKillerQueen said: While Trump is addressing the horrible acts that occurred in Las Vegas and giving solace to the families and the nation, HIllary Clinton is using it as a political platform against the NRA... This is no time to be political, and there is no way to prevent things like this happening. It is easy to acquire assault guns and no law against guns is going to stop people from getting these weapons. Apparently the shooter was in the military and has PTSD. aside from that, this is a incredibly sad and horrible thing. It could happen to ANY of us, especially during concerts. Did you say the same about Trump after Pulse shooting, how he wanted "congrats"? That was worse worse so much worse. https://www.last.fm/user/derOlliM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 172,514 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, lego said: .... sick The f*ck is wrong with these people? 5 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: In 2012 America decided killing children wasn't enough to change the gun laws in this country. The debate ended there. I doubt we'll ever actually change anything. And I'm so sick of seeing "you can't prevent this". We're the only country that deals with this crap on a daily basis. Other nations have found ways to prevent it so obviously there's something wrong here. Whimsical bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,655 Posted October 2, 2017 Author Share Posted October 2, 2017 Just now, PartySick said: The f*ck is wrong with these people? I doubt we'll ever actually change anything. And I'm so sick of seeing "you can't prevent this". We're the only country that deals with this crap on a daily basis. Other nations have found ways to prevent it so obviously there's something wrong here. So many Americans are ignorant about the rest of the world. They truly believe this is the best country in the world. If we're going through it, it MUST be worse elsewhere *rolls eyes* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 Yea he is not muslim so this is not terrorism Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goosey 3,017 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 11 minutes ago, ReginaGeorge said: Yea he is not muslim so this is not terrorism No, it's not terrorism because we don't know his motivations. "I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawnNutella 2,805 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 9 minutes ago, Goosey said: No, it's not terrorism because we don't know his motivations. "NRS 202.4415 "Act of terrorism" defined. "Act of terrorism" means any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to: (a) Cause great bodily harm or death to the general population; or (b) Cause substantial destruction, contamination or impairment of: (1) Any building or infrastructure, communications, transportation, utilities or services; or (2) Any natural resource or the environment." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeka 12,372 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 25 minutes ago, Goosey said: No, it's not terrorism because we don't know his motivations. 13 minutes ago, DawnNutella said: "NRS 202.4415 "Act of terrorism" defined. "Act of terrorism" means any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to: (a) Cause great bodily harm or death to the general population; or (b) Cause substantial destruction, contamination or impairment of: (1) Any building or infrastructure, communications, transportation, utilities or services; or (2) Any natural resource or the environment." This debate was had a few pages back and didn't have a clear answer then and it won't have a clear answer now. Especially considering who one of you is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy McQueen 4,484 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 I have no words. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 47 minutes ago, Goosey said: No, it's not terrorism because we don't know his motivations. 35 minutes ago, DawnNutella said: "NRS 202.4415 "Act of terrorism" defined. "Act of terrorism" means any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to: (a) Cause great bodily harm or death to the general population; or (b) Cause substantial destruction, contamination or impairment of: (1) Any building or infrastructure, communications, transportation, utilities or services; or (2) Any natural resource or the environment." ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goosey 3,017 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 38 minutes ago, DawnNutella said: "NRS 202.4415 "Act of terrorism" defined. That's how Nevada defines it, not how the US Government and everyone else defines it. And by that definition, even killing a single person, which is great bodily harm, could be called 'terrorism'. "I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGD 12,098 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 41 minutes ago, DawnNutella said: "NRS 202.4415 "Act of terrorism" defined. "Act of terrorism" means any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to: (a) Cause great bodily harm or death to the general population; or (b) Cause substantial destruction, contamination or impairment of: (1) Any building or infrastructure, communications, transportation, utilities or services; or (2) Any natural resource or the environment." This is the Nevadan definition of terrorism, but it doesn't override the government/dictionary definition of terrorism. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meruk Holland 2,358 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 1 minute ago, Goosey said: That's how Nevada defines it, not how the US Government and everyone else defines it. And by that definition, even killing a single person, which is great bodily harm, could be called 'terrorism'. It says to general population, so no, killing a single person isn't enough to define an act as terrorism. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.