imnotyourbabe10 6,120 Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 8 hours ago, Edonis said: Bernie did not represent the middle ground at all (he and many of his supporters are too far left to actually appeal to middle America) Thank you for the dialogue. You're right about him not being the middle ground--those were poor choices of words on my end. There seems to be at least a millennial embracement of his ideas, though. And we are seeing the cracks of neoliberalism of the left and right--hence the Bernie support. I personally won't unify behind neoliberalism of either party and will face another 4 years of 45 if so. (And I have been out protesting him, to be sure). There are many of us that don't like the system and the establishment is failing to figure that out. 45 is (allegedly) anti-establishment but for all the wrong reasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Trump 3,508 Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 11 hours ago, GoldenPonyboy said: You said the electoral college was put in place to prevent regional canditates, like one state deciding for the whole country. It is not what i said. There is nothing to agree with, it is a fact. You cant agree or disagree on a fact. It is something that happened in the past, cant change that Since you still don't understand, I'll repeat myself. You rephrased what I said. It has the same root definition. A regional candidate funneling votes out of one area of the country is an extension of what you stated, and is also a reason for the continuation of the electoral college. This is a very strange point you're choosing to debate me on. You can continue arguing syntax if you want, I guess. Ma ma pa pa pa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldenPonyboy 2,434 Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 6 hours ago, President Trump said: Since you still don't understand, I'll repeat myself. You rephrased what I said. It has the same root definition. A regional candidate funneling votes out of one area of the country is an extension of what you stated, and is also a reason for the continuation of the electoral college. This is a very strange point you're choosing to debate me on. You can continue arguing syntax if you want, I guess. A tyrant and regional candidates ... two diffrent things. You can be one without being the other and i think you meant semantics not syntax. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.