Norway to ban burqas in schools & universities

[Melech 9,900]

Just now, Economy said:

Because freedoms have to have limits if they disrupt society

 

Supporting ISIS is supporting terror and death... Nakedness would be very problematic

 

Full covering is inconvienient to talk to. It is not on the same level

 

I do support a ban tho just cuz cameras cant catch u and what if it needs to for a crime scene? I just thought the co parison was exxagerated tho

 

Maybe its cuz i live in Branpton! Muslim Capital of Canada. Im so ised to seeing so many and how nice ppl they are in my area that im not really phased by them 😅

I agree that Nakedness is problematic, too. But full veil is, too in my opinion. 

[codymonster 8,898]

As someone who is a teacher, I fully support this. Reading a students face is an EXTREMELY important part of the teaching process. As well as being able to see who a student is at all times for safety reasons (ex. how students can't wear hats, hoods, etc. in class).

I also have a strong opinion on that religion that makes me also support this ban, but for the sake of my GGD life, I'll keep that one to myself 

[Morphine Prince 109,645]

1 minute ago, Simon said:

It's comment of a woman in the article. Not the article itself what you could have guessed with the '. 

I skimmed through the article and it's as I expected lol

[Melech 9,900]

Just now, Born To Slay said:

No, ISIS is a dangerous organization that kills people. Just being a Muslim doesn't mean you live by that. 

And being naked is far different from a burqa, the former is actually unsanitary. We don't want naked asses sitting in desks. Meanwhile a burqa isn't. I know they want kids to show their faces but honestly, are there enough muslims wearing burqas in Norway that you wouldn't know who did something in school based on the fact they had a burqa? Considering the Muslims only make up 2.4 percen, I doubt it.

But shouldn't be it religious freedom to support a caliphate ?

(ofc I know that majority of Muslims do not support ISIS) 

[Morphine Prince 109,645]

4 minutes ago, Simon said:

So if a religion tells you to wear no clothes, you would be against it? What about religious freedom?

There are religious nudist groups who do that. But they keep it in their own groups because they know nudism is being absebt of clothing and not accepted in society. 

Not comparable to being fully clothed. It's still a clothing choice. 

Your argument would be better if you said there are certain clothing types that are not accepted in all settings. For example, you can't wear a bikini to a court. 

[Melech 9,900]

Just now, Morphine Prince said:

There are religious nudist groups who do that. But they keep it in their owj groups because they know nudism is being absebt of clothing and not accepted in society. 

Not comparable to being fully clothed. It's still a clothing choice. 

Your argument would be better if you said there are certain clothing types that are not accepted in all settings. For example, you can't wear a bikini to a court. 

I obviously used an extreme example for that, cause a burqa is the extreme opposite. 

[Cracks 1,238]

Thanks I live in a country where secularism is already a thing.

[Melech 9,900]

Just now, Cracks said:

Thanks I live in a country where secularism is already a thing.

France?

[Morphine Prince 109,645]

Just now, Simon said:

I obviously used an extreme example for that, cause a burqa is the extreme opposite. 

But it's not a fair example at all. 

Like I said the argument I made above is far more logical and probably what was used in court to determine this. 

[BibleThisWay 4,370]

Would the people defending burqas feel the same about people wearing a balaclava? It's a safety measure, what if the person covering their face did something but couldn't be identified by witnesses or CCTV because they had a burqa on? It's dangerous

[Cracks 1,238]

2 minutes ago, Simon said:

France?

Yes!

[Melech 9,900]

2 minutes ago, BibleThisWay said:

Would the people defending burqas feel the same about people wearing a balaclava? It's a safety measure, what if the person covering their face did something but couldn't be identified by witnesses or CCTV because they had a burqa on? It's dangerous

In Cameroon and Chad there were in fact terrorist attacks by people who wore a burqa 

[Morphine Prince 109,645]

Women are so powerful. Always pushing those boundaries. 

In some places there's laws against them wearing too little and now there's laws about them wearing too much. 

Women remain being a "threat" to society. Incredible. 

 

[BibleThisWay 4,370]

2 minutes ago, Simon said:

In Cameroon and Chad there were in fact terrorist attacks by people who wore a burqa 

Exactly my point. It's insane, i could care less what religion you are, not showing your face in public is a security threat

[Melech 9,900]

3 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

Women are so powerful. Always pushing those boundaries. 

In some places there's laws against them wearing too little and now there's laws about them wearing too much. 

Women remain being a "threat" to society. Incredible. 

 

And yet people mostly only complain about laws against burqas and dont give a **** what woman go through in Iran or Saudi Arabia.