Trump Uses London Mayor's Words Out Of Context To Make Him Look Bad

[Lion Heart 15,041]

15 minutes ago, Misaki said:

How has he not been impeached by now? Well at least there's a bright side, Democrats will likely win by a landside in 2020. And honestly if Trump runs again then as should Hillary. She needs to be the one to take him down, she's been the "bigger man" from the begginning and people need to see this. But her emails!

Lol. 

We said the same thing in 2016. 

 

If people (Dems) want to win, they should actually vote.

[Yuuri 21,636]

3 minutes ago, Lion Heart said:

Lol. 

We said the same thing in 2016. 

 

If people (Dems) want to win, they should actually vote.

They did vote, Hillary had a near 3 million popular vote lead. Just not in the right areas.

[JustaMonster 4,909]

49 minutes ago, Misaki said:

How has he not been impeached by now? Well at least there's a bright side, Democrats will likely win by a landside in 2020. And honestly if Trump runs again then as should Hillary. She needs to be the one to take him down, she's been the "bigger man" from the begginning and people need to see this. But her emails!

Hillary should definitely not run again. Think about it, she lost to DONALD TRUMP even with her huge advantage with financial campaign donations and ads and stuff. If it had been anyone else he probably wouldnt have won. Also there are far too many people who voted against her, just like trump, to make sure she wasnt president. Does anyone really want more Trump vs Hillary? I'm really tired of it. 

[Born To Slay 10,996]

I bet this will help the London mayor politically. It'd be like if Putin criticized Bill De Blasio.

[manicholic 3,694]

5 minutes ago, JustaMonster said:

she lost to DONALD TRUMP even with her huge advantage with financial campaign donations and ads and stuff. 

The TOTAL OPPOSITE is true but I forgive you for having absolutely NO idea how much more money Republicans actually spent to get Trump elected.

And @Misaki I wouldn't be so sure about a landslide in 2020, the GOP's ground game is ruthlessly evil:

https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2017/05/08/sinclair-broadcast-purchasing-tribune-media-heres-short-history-its-right-wing-politics/216330

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/26/robert-mercer-breitbart-war-on-media-steve-bannon-donald-trump-nigel-farage

 

[Elizabeth 750]

The response from Khan/his spokespeople  team was amazing 

"The mayor is busy working with the police, emergency services and the government to coordinate the response to this horrific and cowardly terrorist attack and provide leadership and reassurance to Londoners and visitors to our city.

He has more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump’s ill-informed tweet that deliberately takes out of context his remarks urging Londoners not to be alarmed when they saw more police – including armed officers – on the streets."

 

http://www.unilad.co.uk/news/london-mayor-sadiq-khans-response-to-donald-trumps-tweet-is-pure-class/

[JustaMonster 4,909]

1 hour ago, manicholic said:

The TOTAL OPPOSITE is true but I forgive you for having absolutely NO idea how much more money Republicans actually spent to get Trump elected.

And @Misaki I wouldn't be so sure about a landslide in 2020, the GOP's ground game is ruthlessly evil:

https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2017/05/08/sinclair-broadcast-purchasing-tribune-media-heres-short-history-its-right-wing-politics/216330

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/26/robert-mercer-breitbart-war-on-media-steve-bannon-donald-trump-nigel-farage

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/campaign-finance/

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/09/trump-spent-about-half-of-what-clinton-did-on-his-way-to-the-presidency.html

"His campaign committee spent about $238.9 million through mid-October, compared with $450.6 million by Clinton's. That equals about $859,538 spent per Trump electoral vote, versus about $1.97 million spent per Clinton electoral vote."

The trump campaign raised far less money and spent far less money than the Clinton one did, that was my point.

Its also pretty disgusting how one sided the mainstream media was to Trump throughout his campaign. I'm not a Trump supporter nor a Hillary supporter but from an outside perspective its ridiculous to me how hypocritical both sides usually are. I imagine you would be perfectly ok if the links you posted switched the words republican with democrat. The only reason people dislike it is because it allows other people who they dont agree with to voice their opinions. I think that the news should be non partisan but I guess thats only a pipe dream. 

In the video you posted it says that by them buying TV stations it allows them to broadcast "republican propaganda". This is ridiculous and just goes to show how bad this us vs them mentality has got. People are upset that other people they dont agree with are even allowed to voice an opinion. Disgusting. 

Sorry that this became somewhat of a rant, I didn't mean for it to go this far. 

[manicholic 3,694]

3 minutes ago, JustaMonster said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/campaign-finance/

Doesn't account for the 100 million+ in investments Republicans made in data after ORCA failed them (with Romney in 2012) in order to get their candidate elected in 2016, or all the free 'ads' Sinclair Broadcast Group gave Trump:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/how-that-nations-largest-owner-of-tv-stations-helped-donald-trumps-campaign/2016/12/22/02924864-c7af-11e6-8bee-54e800ef2a63_story.html?utm_term=.af7f9ecb0b52

Looking at this bigger picture, I have hard time being optimistic about a Democrat winning in 2020 just because it may not be Hillary

[manicholic 3,694]

1 hour ago, JustaMonster said:

Its also pretty disgusting how one sided the mainstream media was to Trump throughout his campaign. I'm not a Trump supporter nor a Hillary supporter but from an outside perspective its ridiculous to me how hypocritical both sides usually are. I imagine you would be perfectly ok if the links you posted switched the words republican with democrat. The only reason people dislike it is because it allows other people who they dont agree with to voice their opinions. I think that the news should be non partisan but I guess thats only a pipe dream. 

In the video you posted it says that by them buying TV stations it allows them to broadcast "republican propaganda". This is ridiculous and just goes to show how bad this us vs them mentality has got. People are upset that other people they dont agree with are even allowed to voice an opinion. Disgusting. 

Oh boy... It's quite clear you've no idea yet what Republicans actually do/are for and I can see that spending time providing important info here proved futile yet again.  

[JustaMonster 4,909]

39 minutes ago, manicholic said:

Oh boy... It's quite clear you've no idea yet what Republicans actually do/are for and I can see that spending time providing important info here proved futile yet again.  

Let's just agree to disagree