Bernie Sanders Destroys Obama $400k Speech

[Bt1 5,213]

20 minutes ago, Born To Slay said:

If Bernie really wanted to sling mud he could have brought up Benghazi and the emails but he didn't. He did go after her speeches but aside from that, he didn't really personally attack her. The primary was mostly issues oriented. 

Plus, it's not like she didn't personally attack him. Like when the Clinton camp dug up a pic of him in his bathing suit to embarrass him.

Clinton is in the past. Lets move. We dont really want to really look at how much Bernie Influenced the course of the elections.

 

Its time to get past this nonsense. There are many people on this world who get big money for doing nothing special. It doesnt make any sense going for Obama, who is not even in public position now.

[Whispering 18,865]

10 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

I know what she meant but the phrase still upset many people as we both know. 

"Deplorables" as well. Not that I don't agree with it 

Yes, it upset many people who were looking for something to be upset over. The bottom line is she wasn't degrading college graduates living at home and even Bernie knew that. She was saying that they were frustrated and something needed to be done for them. People who weren't looking to be offended would have found that comforting. 

[Whispering 18,865]

30 minutes ago, Born To Slay said:

If Bernie really wanted to sling mud he could have brought up Benghazi and the emails but he didn't. He did go after her speeches but aside from that, he didn't really personally attack her. The primary was mostly issues oriented. 

Plus, it's not like she didn't personally attack him. Like when the Clinton camp dug up a pic of him in his bathing suit to embarrass him.

Ok, I'm going to tell you the truth here. I never saw this picture or heard about it. I followed this election every day. 

This is a pretty poor example.

[LePetitGAGABLover 21,234]

Who cares??!!?!?! He's no longer an elected politician, so his private actions are irrelevant.

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,366]

2 minutes ago, LePetitMonstr said:

Who cares??!!?!?! He's no longer an elected politician, so his private actions are irrelevant.

THIS ^^

 

[Qualle1 1,385]

I am very sorry, but I have absolutely no problem with former President Barack Obama speaking for 400.000 USD at a Wall Street conference.

I am sure, he will not be kissing their asses and f. e. defend his regulations of the market.

We will soon find out, what his speech was all about.

 

[Economy 53,098]

5 hours ago, Gaga Monster said:

Obama was the one who criticized Wall Street his entire presidency, speech after speech, and now he is doing paid private speeches? Hypocrite much?

And btw, I do like a lot of what Obama did, I liked the guy, but I report news and hypocrisy. 

I dunno much of what Obama did

 

what kind of paid speeches are u talking about?

[Economy 53,098]

39 minutes ago, Qualle1 said:

I am very sorry, but I have absolutely no problem with former President Barack Obama speaking for 400.000 USD at a Wall Street conference.

I am sure, he will not be kissing their asses and f. e. defend his regulations of the market.

We will soon find out, what his speech was all about.

<img alt=":)" data-emoticon="" height="20" src="//gagadaily.com/uploads/emoticons/smile.png" srcset="//gagadaily.com/uploads/emoticons/[email protected] 2x" title=":)" width="20" />

 

Wait so we dont even know what the speech was about? So why are ppl hating exactly? I was thinking the speech was contradictory to stuff he stood for or something

 

is this hate simply because he did work for a corporation????? What the hell is wrong with that?

 

By that line of reasoning working at mcdonalds or walmart is takimg Corporate side because your working for them. The only difference is Obama would be doing something higher up the chain

 

ppl are so dramatic over nothing  

 

i suppose ppl on GGD are gonna hate on me too for investing in stocks and making money off Corporate earnings??? In case yall didnt know, Investing in Corporations is what pays for your retirement funds. If u want nothing to do with Corporations then dont accept your retirement fund gains  

[Qualle1 1,385]

27 minutes ago, Economy said:

Wait so we dont even know what the speech was about? So why are ppl hating exactly? I was thinking the speech was contradictory to stuff he stood for or something

 

is this hate simply because he did work for a corporation????? What the hell is wrong with that?

 

By that line of reasoning working at mcdonalds or walmart is takimg Corporate side because your working for them. The only difference is Obama would be doing something higher up the chain

 

ppl are so dramatic over nothing  

 

i suppose ppl on GGD are gonna hate on me too for investing in stocks and making money off Corporate earnings??? In case yall didnt know, Investing in Corporations is what pays for your retirement funds. If u want nothing to do with Corporations then dont accept your retirement fund gains  

As far as I am informed - and I am not even an US-citizen, nor a native English speaker - he will deliver the speech in September 2017.

To search for and to check more information about his speech took me just a couple of minutes.

I really don't understand all of the fuss...

[Economy 53,098]

2 minutes ago, Qualle1 said:

As far as I am informed - and I am not even an US-citizen, nor a native English speaker - he will deliver the speech in September 2017.

To search for and to check more information about his speech took me just a couple of minutes.

I really don't understand all of the fuss...

I think many Liberals are just determined to hate on Corporations whether or not it makes sense to  

 

thats why im a moderate. Both far lefts and far rights tend to be so stubborn  

[DeleteMyAccount 11,881]

42 minutes ago, Economy said:

Wait so we dont even know what the speech was about? So why are ppl hating exactly? I was thinking the speech was contradictory to stuff he stood for or something

 

is this hate simply because he did work for a corporation????? What the hell is wrong with that?

 

By that line of reasoning working at mcdonalds or walmart is takimg Corporate side because your working for them. The only difference is Obama would be doing something higher up the chain

 

ppl are so dramatic over nothing  

 

i suppose ppl on GGD are gonna hate on me too for investing in stocks and making money off Corporate earnings??? In case yall didnt know, Investing in Corporations is what pays for your retirement funds. If u want nothing to do with Corporations then dont accept your retirement fund gains  

Exactly.

It's basically the case with every anti-Obama thread here. No argument, no substance. 

[Matangi 3,050]

lmao at the dense ****ers who think bernie was why trump was elected. the DNC pushed a weak candidate into their party position creating a choice between the two most disliked presidential candidates in American history. the distrust, elitism, and general dislike of Clinton was clear long before anyone in the US was even aware of who Sanders was. Running against a candidate is called a democratic process, her flaws stand true wether they were pointed out or left unsaid. the fact that donald trump garnered the support of a major part of our nation is why he won. We deserve candidates who represent us, neither of which did. 

[Morphine Prince 109,977]

6 minutes ago, Matangi said:

lmao at the dense ****ers who think bernie was why trump was elected. the DNC pushed a weak candidate into their party position creating a choice between the two most disliked presidential candidates in American history. the distrust, elitism, and general dislike of Clinton was clear long before anyone in the US was even aware of who Sanders was. Running against a candidate is called a democratic process, her flaws stand true wether they were pointed out or left unsaid. the fact that donald trump garnered the support of a major part of our nation is why he won. We deserve candidates who represent us, neither of which did. 

And despite all the negatives she still won the popular vote  

There are no excuses. It is clear Trump convinced the swing state voters and made blue states turn red. 

I won't put the total blame on the Hillary campaign, none of us saw this wave of idiocy actually getting Trump elected. 

[Qualle1 1,385]

29 minutes ago, Economy said:

I think many Liberals are just determined to hate on Corporations whether or not it makes sense to  

 

thats why im a moderate. Both far lefts and far rights tend to be so stubborn  

I am a social democrat, which is center-left here in Germany.

[Delusional Aura 5,129]

Ummm... The man got to make money. Screw morality when majority of you all hook up over Grindr with complete strangers.