Jump to content
society

Bernie Sanders: Anne Coulter has right to speak at Berkely.


Luiz

Featured Posts

PunkTheFunk
6 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

It is ridiculous that we can't even have different opinions in this country anymore.

Tbh

You can hate her guts all you want and disagree with everything she has to say but she has every right to speak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
TheCure
2 minutes ago, lego said:

 

 

 

 

Who are you? I don't talk to fans of fascists. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Qualle1 said:

:udidnt:

The last two posts by The Cure are sickening...

You're sickened by support for free speech and the First Amendment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ann Coulter is disgusting to me, but of course she has the right to speak her mind. Is up to people to be stupid enough to listen to her or not. Bernie's right, y'all can stay pressdt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lego
Just now, TheCure said:

I'm a fan of the free exchange of ideas.  I love how Ann Coulter confronts tough questions.  Whether or not you agree, she's a very smart woman who has the right to be heard.

 

There's nothing smart about racism and white supremacy.

She can talk from her home. She has right wing media. 

 

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

saying religion was wrong and that LGBT should be able to marry was once hate speech. going against the bible and its interpreted sanction of slavery once could have been construed as hate speech. 

the freedom to offend is important to protect since some of those offensive ideas are now common sense due to our allowance of the freedom to express offensive speech. cant protect only the speech that agrees with our liberal agenda. we should embrace the attemprt by the right to give speeches because it affords us the perfect platform to debate them during Q&A portions of their presentation. 

we need to stop meeting their ideas with useless noise and violence and meet it with intellect and refutations. you only kill bad ideas with better ones and we should use every opportunity to present them.

I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

venusfly
15 minutes ago, TheCure said:

I love Ann.  And I love the First Amendment.  NO EXCEPTIONS!  Thousands of men died for this right to free speech.

Uh, filtered free speech works in every other western country in the world, it will work for the US. Hate speech is illegal in the UK, Europe and Canada, political ideas are not repressed in these countries either..

Blind support of hate speech is a thing of the past.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TheCure
2 minutes ago, lego said:

 

There's nothing smart about racism and white supremacy.

She can talk from her home. She has right wing media. 

 

That's not your call.  Just as she can't stop Bernie Sanders from speaking.  There is more left wing media than right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PunkTheFunk
1 minute ago, Luiz said:

saying religion was wrong and that LGBT should be able to marry was once hate speech. going against the bible and its interpreted sanction of slavery once could have been construed as hate speech. 

the freedom to offend is important to protect since some of those offensive ideas are now common sense due to our allowance of the freedom to express offensive speech. cant protect only the speech that agrees with our liberal agenda. we should embrace the attemprt by the right to give speeches because it affords us the perfect platform to debate them during Q&A portions of their presentation. 

we need to stop meeting their ideas with useless noise and violence and meet it with intellect and refutations. you only kill bad ideas with better ones and we should use every opportunity to present them.

One more time for the people in the back

1490026940-1490021024-hbz-meryl-meme-ind

Link to post
Share on other sites

JanPianoMusic

He is absolutely right. 

Nobody has been forced to listen to her - people are free to choose not to attend! Determining one's right to speak in public based on their beliefs does not sound democratic to me. It's not as if she is advocating genocide or eugenics, is it? 

You will never please everyone.
Link to post
Share on other sites

TheCure
Just now, LG said:

Uh, filtered free speech works in every other western country in the world, it will work for the US. Hate speech is illegal in the UK, Europe and Canada, political ideas are not repressed in these countries either..

No that doesn't work.  You can go to jail for a Facebook post in the UK.  I don't want to live in that kind of society.  That's fake freedom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lego
1 minute ago, TheCure said:

That's not your call.  Just as she can't stop Bernie Sanders from speaking.  There is more left wing media than right.

 

 

Bernie is not spewing hate against minorities. 

 

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bebe

Like it or not, Ann Coulter is a popular commentator :shrug: Like it or not this isn't some fringe person on the sidelines.

I understand why people would want to shut her down, but I'm always more on the side of free speech. At least at a venue like Berkeley there would be the opportunity for opposition, there would be an opportunity to counter the BS she spews, there would be the opportunity to challenge her.

They can protest all they want, but let her speak. Stopping her from speaking at universities isn't going to make her unpopular and stop people from believing her ideas... It only creates controversy that brings more eyeballs and ears to her and it only pushes her to venues that are friendly and will provide little opportunity for criticism and opposition.

Like Bernie said "Ask her the hard questions. Confront her intellectually" - that could happen at Berkeley. Instead this is going to be plastered on the news, a whole bunch of people are going to look her up and see what she is about, she is going to be able to spread her message further and she will only be able to speak in friendly environments that offer little to no opposition for her. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lego
2 minutes ago, JanPianoMusic said:

He is absolutely right. 

Nobody has been forced to listen to her - people are free to choose not to attend! Determining one's right to speak in public based on their beliefs does not sound democratic to me. It's not as if she is advocating genocide or eugenics, is it? 

 

https://coulterwatch.wordpress.com/2016/04/05/lets-nuke-europe-for-the-fun-of-it/amp/

 

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince

Also, how does it look that liberals are VIOLENT? 

You do realize this feeds conservatives? 

Remember who is in power right now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...