Jump to content
The Evolution of Gaga
lgbt

'When We Rise' Low Ratings...


En_Sabah_Nur

Featured Posts

En_Sabah_Nur
6 hours ago, gagagoogoose said:

I'm just glad that there's a touching TV representation of LGBT history. Ratings are just incentives.

:hug: 

 

Egypt. W
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
AlphaMonster

It's hard to form a political unity in a community driven by sexual desire.

Realistically, if you want gays to watch a TV Show, you have to have cute/handsome, somewhat charismatic gay characters.

Even, Looking got cancelled because they did not have a Brian Kinney. All characters were semi-losers.

About POCs gays, the moment character's storyline turns about being POC, it will lose ratings. Like the latino guy from Looking. If you want diversity, you have to keep it cool and sexually attractive, if that latino homo was son of a mexican drug lord instead of a mediocre barber with bad fashion taste, Looking might have not been cancelled. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

En_Sabah_Nur
5 minutes ago, AlphaMonster said:

if that latino homo was son of a mexican drug lord

So he has to be a stereotype in order for people to watch?!  :oprah:

 

Egypt. W
Link to post
Share on other sites

Daredevil

I agree we shouldn't forget about our legacy, but this was already done before. It was a tragic time for the LGBTQA+ Community  (and it still is), and people who fought for this shouldn't be forgotten. But we need more blockbusters with representation and not some pity-me movies and series like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AlphaMonster
10 minutes ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

So he has to be a stereotype in order for people to watch?!  :oprah:

 

What ? He was a latino stereotype. A random barber from an undereducated family, badly groomed with thug-like dressing style. Classic undereducated family coming to the states to make a living without any dreams story.

Son of a drug lord would be wearing Giuseppe Zanotti suits with Hublot watches, his cold-hearted charisma would have been radiant. I don't remember one TV show that depicted gay son of a drug lord. But since you considered it to be a stereotype, I assume you might have thought of thug son of back alley pot dealer.

Edit: He has to be a character, not a typical POC stereotype, no one wants to watch such single layered personnas on TV.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SKANK said:

I didn't watch it. I intend to at some point. When the swamp of rabid identity politics recedes a bit.

That being said, almost three million people watching the story of the Queer Liberation seems like a victory to me.

This

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Child
36 minutes ago, AlphaMonster said:

It's hard to form a political unity in a community driven by sexual desire.

Realistically, if you want gays to watch a TV Show, you have to have cute/handsome, somewhat charismatic gay characters.

But isn't it the same for straight people? 

Plus our community is driven by sexual desire because society wants to repress it.

‘If religion be the cause of disunity, then irreligion is surely to be preferred.’ ‘Abdu’l-Bahá
Link to post
Share on other sites

AlphaMonster
13 hours ago, CrazyMonster said:

But isn't it the same for straight people? 

Plus our community is driven by sexual desire because society wants to repress it.

Well yes to some extent but not as significant as it is for gays but those are just my opinions, I do not say that they have any factual relevance.

It is not only because of community's approach to it in my opinion. Conservative demographic that is repelled by sexual drive in media is significant for straight part of the society. It is not significant for gays because by its very definition, conservatism is based on ideas of preserving traditional social institutions which exclude gays. 

Being excluded from traditional institutions, gays developed a strong protest culture revolving around sexual liberation which I see as one of the main reasons why gay culture is so driven by sex. 

As a result of being oppressed minority for so long, I feel like gays have such defense mechanism against "loser" representation of gays on media that gays want to see "winning" gays, not "losing" ones.
I put quotes because depending on the context winning might mean anything positive or losing might mean anything negative. Just as an example, QAF would probably not become QAF we know if it wasn't for winning characters like Brian or Justin, gays wouldn't watch a show focused on self-pity of Ted from that show.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claymore
12 hours ago, SKANK said:

 

 

I'm Not Your Negro made 5 million at the box office. Tyler Perry's last Madea movie made 75 million. Yet you would probably not extrapolate from that figure to insult all African Americans right? Probably not. Stay woke.

 

 

And where exactly was I talking about numbers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

SychosSoChic
13 hours ago, MISSROBINGRAY said:

Leave it to the gays to bash an LGBT show just cause it doesn't have butt sex, rhinestones and dumb catchphrases :oprah: and then y'all act surprised when your rights are snatched from under yo ass. But hey, we have grindr, drag race and that one slutty gay character in How To Get Away With Murder. We woke.

JASMINE MASTERS JUST WONT STOP SPILLING TEA :giveup:

Life ain't Hollywood for any one of us.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...