Jump to content

💙 HEAVY METAL LOVER T-SHIRT 💚

Follow Gaga Daily on Telegram
question

Should singles still be picked based on radio?


sexy

Featured Posts

With the success of songs like Bad and Boujee, Bounce Back, Black Beatles, Panda, Closer, Fake Love – all songs that are not "traditional" hits, but have found success, largely due to streaming and not radio airplay. Bad and Boujee, for example, hit #1 with streaming numbers upwards of 30 million.

With YouTube and Spotify playing an increasingly potent role in the success of a song, should Gaga move forward with a more traditional, radio friendly single (i.e. A-YO), or attempt something that might be a little bit catchier and controversial (i.e. John Wayne, Dancin' in Circles, Diamond Heart) that likely wouldn't catch onto most mainstream radio stations? 

(I was previously very against DiC as a single, but I'm starting to feel like it might do well given what's doing well on the charts right now)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, kevindjibouti said:

Closer is nothing else than a traditional hit

Traditional in what sense? Maybe in the context of 2016 as a whole.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JustAnotherDay

Also, John Wayne and Diamond Heart will flop, no matter what you say, no matter what you do, it will flop. 

was NickARTPOP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neight Shayde
2 minutes ago, NickARTPOP said:

Also, John Wayne and Diamond Heart will flop, no matter what you say, no matter what you do, it will flop. 

Wendyeyeroll.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

RonnieGagz
8 minutes ago, kevindjibouti said:

Closer is nothing else than a traditional hit

It isn't traditional but its basic as fvck

♡Gaga♡TØP♡Nightwish♡Lana♡Lorde♡Grimes♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anderson123

Radio hits are very unpredictable sometimes. It's either a catchy song or got famous because of some viral video that got people to listen to the song.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JustAnotherDay
31 minutes ago, BrothaGaga said:

Wendyeyeroll.gif

it's too loud for radio, I wish the gp had taste and could accept it though :ohno:

 

was NickARTPOP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neight Shayde
7 minutes ago, NickARTPOP said:

it's too loud for radio, I wish the gp had taste and could accept it though :ohno:

 

i think Diamond Heart is just as loud as Shawn Mendes' "Treat You Better" (except for DH's bridge).

I think it has a really good shot, to be honest.

but then again, we're talking about Gaga, an artist who totally gets ignored on the radio.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JustAnotherDay
Just now, BrothaGaga said:

i think Diamond Heart is just as loud as Shawn Mendes' "Treat You Better" (except for DH's bridge).

I think it has a really good shot, to be honest.

but then again, we're talking about Gaga, an artist who totally gets ignored on the radio.

not really, DH uses much more instrumentation while TYB has a lot less. Not to mention, Shawn has a much better relationship with radio right now. Unfortunately, rock just isn't big right now :noparty:

was NickARTPOP
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kevindjibouti said:

I can't find the difference :huh:

The way I see it is being "traditional" relates more to the musical makeup of a song while what constitutes being "basic" is its lyrical content. So, generally, a song that is traditional isn't necessarily basic and a song that's traditional isn't automatically basic.

For example, I Kissed a Girl. Sonically, there's nothing special about it. It's typical pop rock. Its subject matter, conversely, is very edgy and pushed the envelope – especially with cleverly naughty innuendo like "cherry chapstick." It's a traditional song musically with subject matter that is very risqué.

Closer. Lyrically, it's about as basic as you can get. But I wouldn't call it musically traditional. It's EDM, but EDM in a rawer form that has only recently become popular in the mainstream. Therefore, it's a basic song, but you can't really call it "traditional" in the sense that it sounds like other songs before it (I'm not saying it's anything revolutionary, I actually don't care for it, but this song wouldn't've happened in the 2000s, it has a sound rooted in the mid-to-later part of this decade). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...