Trump W.H. staff have Private RNC emails

[JusKeepBreathin 19,311]

Senior Trump administration staffers, including Kellyanne Conway, Jared Kushner, Sean Spicer and Steve Bannon, have active accounts on a Republican National Committee (RNC) email system, Newsweek has learned.

The system (rnchq.org) is the same one the George W. Bush administration was accused of using to evade transparency rules after claiming to have “lost” 22 million emails.

(Since this story was published, the RNC has deleted the emails of Bannon, Kushner and Conway. Newsweek is waiting for further comment.)

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-emails-rnc-reince-priebus-white-house-server-548191

[Saint Hollywood 37,364]

inb4 The E-mail Scandal: Trump Edition 

[Fatigay 21,211]

Emailgate

#LockEmUp

[MJHolland 12,725]

It's a really secure system, makes sense they had addresses during transition. 

[Yuuri 21,636]

Hope his deleted emails leak.

 

[Whispering 18,865]

20 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

It's a really secure system, makes sense they had addresses during transition. 

Nothing is secure when it comes to Russian hacking. However, the Russians won't release anything as long as Trump continues to be Putin's puppet boy.  

[MJHolland 12,725]

7 minutes ago, Whispering said:

Nothing is secure when it comes to Russian hacking. However, the Russians won't release anything as long as Trump continues to be Putin's puppet boy.  

Russia failed to hack the RNC. 

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/310683-report-russians-failed-to-hack-rnc

It's an extremely well build infrastructure and requires an obnoxious about of verification, I know firsthand. Wayyyy more security protocol than the DNC.

Edit: Whatever Russian may or may not be using to blackmail Trump was gained outside the RNC I think

[Whispering 18,865]

1 minute ago, MJHolland said:

Russia failed to hack the RNC. 

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/310683-report-russians-failed-to-hack-rnc

It's an extremely well build infrastructure and requires an obnoxious about of verification, I know firsthand. Wayyyy more security protocol than the DNC.

Of course they did. It's easy yo fail when you don't really try.

They are going to get whatever they want, and no government or private server will stop them. 

[venusfly 17,885]

24 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

Russia failed to hack the RNC. 

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/310683-report-russians-failed-to-hack-rnc

It's an extremely well build infrastructure and requires an obnoxious about of verification, I know firsthand. Wayyyy more security protocol than the DNC.

Edit: Whatever Russian may or may not be using to blackmail Trump was gained outside the RNC I think

the article says nothing about their security or infrastructure, in fact it mentions that the RNC were not targeted as hard as the DNC were, only 1 account was attempted to be broken into. 

[MJHolland 12,725]

25 minutes ago, Whispering said:

Of course they did. It's easy yo fail when you don't really try.

They are going to get whatever they want, and no government or private server will stop them. 

 

2 minutes ago, LG said:

the article says nothing about their security or infrastructure, in fact it mentions that the RNC were not targeted as hard as the DNC were, only 1 account was attempted to be broken into. 

OK OK lol it's not like I'm supporting these people using the server now if they're technically working for the WH.

All I'm saying is that I have personal experience with that system and it is really secure. Like they go through a lot of procedures to make sure it's very secure. As far as I know, it's never been breached by any group - Russian or otherwise. 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-national-committee-security-foiled-russian-hackers-1481850043

You can also read this article ^. Apparently they tried the same techniques that were successful in the DNC hack, so I don't think that's totally fair logic you used Whispering haha.

I don't have a strong opinion about any of this don't come for me 

[Whispering 18,865]

1 minute ago, MJHolland said:

 

OK OK lol it's not like I'm supporting these people using the server now if they're technically working for the WH.

All I'm saying is that I have personal experience with that system and it is really secure. Like they go through a lot of procedures to make sure it's very secure. As far as I know, it's never been breached by any group - Russian or otherwise. 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-national-committee-security-foiled-russian-hackers-1481850043

You can also read this article ^. Apparently they tried the same techniques that were successful in the DNC hack, so I don't think that's totally fair logic you used Whispering haha.

I don't have a strong opinion about any of this don't come for me 

It was secure for you, not for people that are experts. 

Hackers can get into anything. If you want to keep something from being hacked, don't put it online. Banks, Financial systems, Government departments have secure procedures, but that doesn't stop people from gaining access. 

If the Russians had wanted to get into Republican servers, they would have. 

They arent going to have to worry about hacking from the Russians, but there might be another group that wants information. People should really stick with just the basic facts in emails and texts from here on out, because anything they put out is at risk. 

[MJHolland 12,725]

1 hour ago, Whispering said:

It was secure for you, not for people that are experts. 

Hackers can get into anything. If you want to keep something from being hacked, don't put it online. Banks, Financial systems, Government departments have secure procedures, but that doesn't stop people from gaining access. 

If the Russians had wanted to get into Republican servers, they would have. 

They arent going to have to worry about hacking from the Russians, but there might be another group that wants information. People should really stick with just the basic facts in emails and texts from here on out, because anything they put out is at risk. 

If only the DNC/Hil campaign followed that golden rule instead of bashing Bernie 

I totally agree. Once you make it digital it can be leaked. 

[Whispering 18,865]

6 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

If only the DNC/Hil campaign followed that golden rule instead of bashing Bernie 

I totally agree. Once you make it digital it can be leaked. 

Eh, even Bernie said he was happy they hadn't exposed his emails. People share their thoughts they wouldn't share in public when they think it is private. No telling what Bernie's camp was saying about Hillary. But all that is to be expected, politics is brutal. 

I'm hoping people who might be up for the Democratic nomination in three years are using Carrier Pigeons! 

[MJHolland 12,725]

49 minutes ago, Whispering said:

Eh, even Bernie said he was happy they hadn't exposed his emails. People share their thoughts they wouldn't share in public when they think it is private. No telling what Bernie's camp was saying about Hillary. But all that is to be expected, politics is brutal. 

I'm hoping people who might be up for the Democratic nomination in three years are using Carrier Pigeons! 

Lol you have no clue how serious I am about this hahaha like if the democrats do not get their act together and unify to take the right down during the 2018 and 2020 elections I will become intently furious. 

 Like we cannot make a single mistake or give them any opportunity lol.