Jump to content
The Evolution of Gaga
politics

James O'Keefe tries to engineer riots at Trump inauguration


lego

Featured Posts

38 minutes ago, DrewStevens said:

But this is not the same thing as provoking violence amongst protesters by manipulating them during the protest. This is literally hiring people to interrupt a ceremony and probably get violent, which is way more serious than just insulting some protesters.

No, he was making a 'sting' video. That's what he does.

Again, from r/The_Donald:

08P0Nfu.png

"I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump
Link to post
Share on other sites

DrewStevens
29 minutes ago, Tokyo Rose said:

If the people in Chicago who assaulted the disabled Trump supporter and are now in prison, were actually hired, we would have instantly heard about that. 

If what you just described actually happened, that would be a crime.

But something like that would never work out in real life. The person who was hired would instantly come out and expose everything the second criminal charges came down on them.

That's why this isn't world news!

 

What? Are we even talking a about the same news?

This is about the inauguration, not a past event. The article doesn't mention Chicago. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tokyo Rose
Just now, DrewStevens said:

What? Are we even talking a about the same news?

This is about the inauguration, not a past event. The article doesn't mention Chicago. 

That's called playing dumb

Link to post
Share on other sites

DrewStevens
9 minutes ago, Goosey said:

No, he was making a 'sting' video. That's what he does.

Again, from r/The_Donald:

08P0Nfu.png

Do you realize that is incredibly stupid and could also be a lie just to save his lying biased ass?

Link to post
Share on other sites

DrewStevens
1 minute ago, Tokyo Rose said:

That's called playing dumb

Lol for what? For staying on topic and actually reading the article and not just the headline?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tokyo Rose
3 minutes ago, DrewStevens said:

Lol for what? For staying on topic and actually reading the article and not just the headline?

I am reading, that's why I'm not the one who needs all those question marks

Link to post
Share on other sites

DrewStevens
Just now, Tokyo Rose said:

I am reading, that's why I'm not the one who needs all those question marks

Well you clearly did not get the article at all. 

The article doesn't say James O'Keefe organized every demonstration against Trump ever. The article only states that people who claim to be part of his team are hiring people to disrupt the inauguration. So I don't know why do you have to mention what happened to that Trump supporter when it's unrelated to this news.

If you don't like this kind of minor news under the World News section then contact the mods to have another section for them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tokyo Rose
4 minutes ago, DrewStevens said:

Well you clearly did not get the article at all. 

The article doesn't say James O'Keefe organized every demonstration against Trump ever. The article only states that people who claim to be part of his team are hiring people to disrupt the inauguration. So I don't know why do you have to mention what happened to that Trump supporter when it's unrelated to this news.

You're lying when you say it's unrelated. You're lying when you claim anyone was hired. 

This is not World News, I don't need mods to validate what's clear as day to any unbiased person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DrewStevens
Just now, Tokyo Rose said:

You're lying when you say it's unrelated. You're lying when you claim anyone was hired. 

This is not World News, I don't need mods to validate what's clear as day to any unbiased person.

Well then report it as not news instead of being such a cry baby.

And it's unrelated to what happened to that Trump supporter since no one insisted those people to do it. They weren't even protesting, they were torturing someone based on their political beliefs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, DrewStevens said:

Do you realize that is incredibly stupid and could also be a lie just to save his lying biased ass?

Obviously not a lie. He's known for EXACTLY this type of thing. Then when they accepted the money he would have exposed them for accepting bribes for causing a ruckus.

He has accused the Democrats of doing this all along.

"I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump
Link to post
Share on other sites

DrewStevens
5 minutes ago, Goosey said:

Obviously not a lie. He's known for EXACTLY this type of thing. Then when they accepted the money he would have exposed them for accepting bribes for causing a ruckus.

He has accused the Democrats of doing this all along.

So now he is being exposed for being desperate enough to try to discredit a whole bunch of people using money? Wow that sounds like a great idea. 

If that was his plan then where are his tapes exposing all those people who actually accepted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, DrewStevens said:

If that was his plan then where are his tapes exposing all those people who actually accepted?

It's called "Project Veritas", look it up.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/19/two-democratic-operatives-lose-jobs-after-james-okeefe-sting/?utm_term=.07d51cdc334b

"I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump
Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering
4 hours ago, Goosey said:

From Snopes:

"The October 2016 releases weren't Project Veritas' first foray into the 2016 elections and the political climate of the day. In March 2016, O'Keefe infamously bungled an attempted "investigation" by failing to hang up his phone after calling a target (thereby exposing his plot to those whom he was trying to fool). A May 2016 New Yorker article about that aborted sting examined the forces behind Project Veritas and the diminishing impact of deceptive videos."

"Project Veritas' October 2016 election-related sting videos (embedded above) reveal tidbits of selectively and (likely deceptively edited) footage
absent of any context in which to evaluate them. Unless his organization releases the footage in full, undertaking a fair assessment of their veracity is all but impossible."

He's a con man, which has been proven over and over. The same holds true here. Once again, he is attempting to deceive and commit fraud. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...