Fake Music

[TSUNAMI 20,395]

copied from: http://www.anonews.co/fake-music-industry/

 

In this day and age, it doesn’t take much for a person/song to become popular in a short period of time. It seems that anyone on the planet could get behind a microphone in a studio and make a hit song. Why is this? Because vocals are tampered with, songs are written by a team of professionals instead of an artist, and all it takes is a person, talent or no talent, to complete the project.

Apart from that, a young woman could be giving a major performance completely naked (and doing all sorts of ‘vulgar’ things onstage), and it would seem completely normal. This is something we’ve seen recently at multiple major performances, and it represents something far from art…

 

These days, for a song to become a “hit,” all that’s needed is the backing of a giant music corporation like Universal Records (for example). Once an individual is willing to “sell their soul” (a phrase commonly used by music artists)  for fame and fortune, the record company will take care of the rest, no talent required.

We are made to worship some of these people, we want to be like them, look like them, dress like them. Many popular music artists today have become nothing short of walking corporate billboards, often used to influence the minds of the masses, generate huge profits, and influence consumer behaviour. This is no conspiracy, various artists have hinted at the fact that a large portion of music is used for mind control. ODB from the Wu-Tang-Clan is one example out of many.

Rosaenne Barr, another Hollywood superstar, has stated that the entertainment industry is ruled by “MK Ultra.” MK Ultra was the name for a previously classified research program through the CIA’s scientific intelligence division. These ideas are not farfetched, and based on all of my own research, I have no doubt that a large portion and purpose of the mainstream music industry, and the entertainment industry in general, is to influence the minds of the masses to think a certain way, to consume, and worship ‘idol’ like figures. It’s just another tactic to keep us occupied; it seems most of our lives have become about work and entertainment, things meant to distract us from focusing on what’s happening in the world around us. We have been overtaken by mass propaganda.

Moreover, the CIA has been involved with the entertainment industry from its inception, they have an entire department dedicated to it. (source) The entire entertainment industry is also owned by the “1 percent..” Something to think about…

Here  is a great clip of Michael Jackson exposing Sony.

Why do some artists (some talented, many not) get picked up by these big corporations to become major influences of young people, and others with unbelievable talent never make it anywhere?

This topic goes far into esoteric principles, mind control, occultism and more, but I’ll save that for another article. A lot of these ideas about the music industry and its purpose is evidence-based and goes far beyond what people “just say.” There is no shortage of information available to suggest that mainstream music is a tool for brainwashing the masses, and some of the information in the below video alluded to that. At the same time, there is a lot of good stuff out there, making it an utter shame that any kind of song can be a “hit” as long as it has the big music machine promoting and marketing it.

The driving force behind mainstream music, in my opinion, has little to do with music itself.

Below is a great video done by RT news that illustrates how a large portion of mainstream music isn’t really about the music.

 

What do you guys think about this? 

[The Surrealist 27,470]

3 minutes ago, Parach said:

Apart from that, a young woman could be giving a major performance completely naked (and doing all sorts of ‘vulgar’ things onstage), and it would seem completely normal

Do you know which forum this is?

[Seeka 12,372]

I roll my eyes everytime I see this stuff.

I think they forget the music industry extends beyond America. I listen to J-Pop, vocaloids, videogame soundtracks, most of which, are not made in America,

It's about as real as my sex life, which is non-existent.

[Guest]

I doubt it's true and this belief that there's a secret society (illuminati or whatever y'all talking about) and that there's a higher power watching over and trying to control us isn't far fetched, could be right, there are facts that governments in certain countries watch the citizens (and yet again people sound paranoid and dramatize this situation a little too much) but with music I wouldn't understand the purpose. Entertainment, to keep us away from politics? Media is a tool to force an opinion on politics to the mass. Plus, I doubt that somebody like Tupac who came from nothing and made music, just like many other artists would be okay to be part of this 'deal'. Most celebs sorry to say it but aren't smart or gods, they might seem like they have power over the entire world but they don't, nobody really gives a ****, if anything we control them by always having this constant urge to know more about the scandals of their private lives.

[Edonis 28,548]

On topic: I lowkey agree to an extent that anyone can put something out and if marketed well, they'll succeed. 

But a little bit off topic, I'm genuinely curious about how many people feel about artists getting naked on stage and using sex to sell. Everyone on here is a fan of Gaga to some extent and it would be ludicrous to say she hasn't used sex to sell, so how do people on here feel about it. Of course there are classless ways to sell that form of art as well (which some artists happen to do, a lot 👀) A sizeable amount of people on here seem to shame other artists who go that route, despite the fact that this is a forum dedicated to Lady Gaga, someone who has done it with every era so far. Were they as upset then when she did/does it as they are when other artists do it? 

Sorry about the rant lol

[Seeka 12,372]

1 minute ago, Edonis said:

On topic: I lowkey agree to an extent that anyone can put something out and if marketed well, they'll succeed. 

But a little bit off topic, I'm genuinely curious about how many people feel about artists getting naked on stage and using sex to sell. Everyone on here is a fan of Gaga to some extent and it would be ludicrous to say she hasn't used sex to sell, so how do people on here feel about it. Of course there are classless ways to sell that form of art as well (which some artists happen to do, a lot 👀) A sizeable amount of people on here seem to shame other artists who go that route, despite the fact that this is a forum dedicated to Lady Gaga, someone who has done it with every era so far. Were they as upset then when she did/does it as they are when other artists do it? 

Sorry about the rant lol

I think the thing is. we've been kind of led away from the idea of Gaga's nudity being linked to fanservice, which is what sex sells basically is. Most of the time, when she is naked or nearly naked, there usually a form of fan disservice nearby. Or Gaga makes fun of sex or brings up the donkey **** thing again.

gaga just has never been like "Here I am, naked, please buy my stuff, I'm sexy" like Rihanna or Ariana. Plus Gaga has only had a few videos where she is naked or wearing some fanservicey outfit without a storyline. Like, the last time we have that was... LoveGame.  Paparazzi was the start of her MVs with narratives. Maybe Eh,eh, but Paparazzi had the most obvious storyline.

[Sid 6,755]

I can't believe people actually believe stuff like this  the world is bigger than america, the CIA has no influence over other countries and yet they still have mass entertainment networks and celebrities. The most successful music group of all time (The Beatles) were not even from the US. 

I highly doubt the CIA got together and said 'let's program Taylor to sing Shake It Off today' 

[Edonis 28,548]

2 minutes ago, Seeka said:

I think the thing is. we've been kind of led away from the idea of Gaga's nudity being linked to fanservice, which is what sex sells basically is. Most of the time, when she is naked or nearly naked, there usually a form of fan disservice nearby. Or Gaga makes fun of sex or brings up the donkey **** thing again.

gaga just has never been like "Here I am, naked, please buy my stuff, I'm sexy" like Rihanna or Ariana. Plus Gaga has only had a few videos where she is naked or wearing some fanservicey outfit without a storyline. Like, the last time we have that was... LoveGame.  Paparazzi was the start of her MVs with narratives. Maybe Eh,eh, but Paparazzi had the most obvious storyline.

G.U.Y. comes to mind. Regardless of whether there's a plot or not it's still considered selling sex though. Like I said, there are more tasteful ways to approach sex in the music industry, but I've noticed a pattern of criticizing things other artists do when Gaga has done similar things in the past. Perfect Illusion with the crop top exposing her breasts comes to mind as well lol. 

[indepenDANCE 29]

@ katyperry 

[heavymetall0v3r 910]

This is a strongly written and concise, accurate (in my opinion) mini-thesis. Well done.

[Seeka 12,372]

18 minutes ago, Edonis said:

G.U.Y. comes to mind. Regardless of whether there's a plot or not it's still considered selling sex though. Like I said, there are more tasteful ways to approach sex in the music industry, but I've noticed a pattern of criticizing things other artists do when Gaga has done similar things in the past. Perfect Illusion with the crop top exposing her breasts comes to mind as well lol. 

GUY was also ridiculous as Telephone.

Sex sells everywhere, honestly, but in different ways.

I'm sure Cry wouldn't have a fanbase if his voice wasn't sexy as it was and he had an air of mystery which made him sexier.

LPers even use sex sells. Plus Sex sells doesn't actually work, as we have become immune to nudity, some of us. Like it has become overexposed to the point it's boring. Sex doesn't really sell unless combined with anoher feature.

Fanservice only does so much.

[Edonis 28,548]

8 minutes ago, Seeka said:

GUY was also ridiculous as Telephone.

Sex sells everywhere, honestly, but in different ways.

I'm sure Cry wouldn't have a fanbase if his voice wasn't sexy as it was and he had an air of mystery which made him sexier.

LPers even use sex sells. Plus Sex sells doesn't actually work, as we have become immune to nudity, some of us. Like it has become overexposed to the point it's boring. Sex doesn't really sell unless combined with anoher feature.

Fanservice only does so much.

I wholeheartedly agree, I was just wondering if that really was an indicator of a "fake industry" like the OP suggested. It's become so common now that I don't even think it's as necessary as it once was years ago. 

[Seeka 12,372]

3 minutes ago, Edonis said:

I wholeheartedly agree, I was just wondering if that really was an indicator of a "fake industry" like the OP suggested. It's become so common now that I don't even think it's as necessary as it once was years ago. 

I don't think it does, really, as like I said, there is more to music than America, and sex sells is everywhere. Anime, games, movies, music...

We're just more free than were were years ago, and so we do what we want.

[whore 11,447]

I've literally completed four albums using my phone as a microphone and my laptop for productions and mixing. So I kind of see the point of this article, but I made it all by myself with no team, so

[Evan Peters 10,458]

how boring must your life be to think the CIA controls everything in america. there's a lot of fake/shady **** that goes on in Hollywood, but that's how the business works. It has nothing to do with the government telling people what to do