Kattys 4,319 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 15 minutes ago, thotiana said: "ONE OF THE BEST EXPERIENCES I'VE HAD WAS WITH A TEENAGE BOY" read better henny teenage not kid so... lmao Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pop 4,541 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Madonna is a huge mess. Like she shouldn't be respected at all after all the messy **** she did. The Taylor Brigade: KNOCKOUT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yASSsss 35,510 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 4 minutes ago, Prince Bananas said: What if she had that experience when she was a teenager? she's talking about "having sex with the young can be fun" and what teenager has their own apartment to live,knowing that it's the 70's we're talking about Call me by your name and I'll call you by mine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
petty 9,412 Posted May 22, 2016 Author Share Posted May 22, 2016 Lol ofc ppl are defending her. Never change GGD! Why not say virgin? Why not clarify? By eluding to "teenage" and talking about him being a virgin and living with his mother, she's making it seem as if he's 17or younger. Its totally fxcked up so I don't get all these people trying to justify it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUO YI 6,089 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Just now, yASSsss said: she's talking about "having sex with the young can be fun" and what teenager have their own apartment to live,knowing that it's the 70's we're talking about Bc it's fun jk Wasn't it the 90's? oMG I have to read SEX The night sky tells all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody3089 250 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 He even gave her crabs, so I'm sure he was not under age and neither a virgin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spock 20,290 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 UGH, already asked an answered on ATRL. The SEX book is fiction, it's her writing as the Dita character she created during that era and sharing her sexual fantasies. Away with this flamebait and stupid thread 21 minutes ago, thotiana said: "ONE OF THE BEST EXPERIENCES I'VE HAD WAS WITH A TEENAGE BOY" read better henny Teenage doesn't mean minor. He could be 18 or 19 who will love me when the night is over Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrawberryBlond 14,451 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Whether it was real or not, that is a pretty sick fantasy. Now, while there was no mention of him actually being underage, she sure put in a lot of graphic descriptions that suggested that he was very young, under-age young: "teenage boy," "a virgin," "barely any pubic hair," "he never went to school," "he wasn't very big, he was a baby." None of this is coincidental, it's meant to be titillating and appeal to your darker, creepy side. And that's all very well...but don't bring borderline underage characters into it. If they're young, make it blatantly clear that they are legal. But don't overemphasise the youth, don't fetishise the youth, don't make it sound like they are attractive purely because of their youth. But she's doing all these things here and its disgraceful. Let's put this another way...take this passage and switch the genders. It's a man talking about sex with a teenage girl, that she was a virgin and had barely any pubic hair and didn't go to school and hung out at his house and slept over at his when her parents kicked her out. Now, would you say: "don't judge, it's just harmless fantasy?" No, a man wouldn't get away with writing this. Notice when the subject is a boy, some of you said he had barely any public hair because he was a late developer or shaved? That shouldn't be the train of thought you go down when you hear this. But if it was a girl described as having no pubic hair, would you assume she was a late developer or had shaved? No, you'd assume she was underage. Because we look at boys and girls sexual situations differently. At the end of the day, this was one hell of a creepy story, real or not. And it's wrong how women are not questioned when they appear to have sick fantasies involving very young boys but when men do it, they're villified. Some feminism. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yASSsss 35,510 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Just now, Prince Bananas said: Bc it's fun jk Wasn't it the 90's? oMG I have to read SEX no i mean,she was a teenager in the 70's (if we're to believe that she had this experience when she was a teenager ) but yeah,the book came out in the 90's Call me by your name and I'll call you by mine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellatrix 34,642 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 6 minutes ago, thotiana said: Lol ofc ppl are defending her. Never change GGD! Why not say virgin? Why not clarify? By eluding to "teenage" and talking about him being a virgin and living with his mother, she's making it seem as if he's 17or younger. Its totally fxcked up so I don't get all these people trying to justify it! You're the one thinking he was 17 or younger and forgetting that 18 and 19 are teenagers as well. 15 is the legal age here, so that would've been ok here too. Don't forget that. Teenager doesn't equal a child. Also, many are staying with their parents even when they're 19 or even in the 20s. Don't judge when you don't know a sh*t. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snow 1,582 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Seriously? Like f.ING seriously this is a discussion?! Jesus... Its a story, it hasent happened, it doesnt say under age, it doesnt specify M's age at The time. AND IT TELLS A STORIES AND FANTASIES OF A WOMAN CALLED DITA not M. FICTION! What The heck are you pathetic dramaqueen haters on about ?! And taking The moral high ground on this site.... Lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeka 12,372 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 2 minutes ago, thotiana said: Lol ofc ppl are defending her. Never change GGD! Why not say virgin? Why not clarify? By eluding to "teenage" and talking about him being a virgin and living with his mother, she's making it seem as if he's 17or younger. Its totally fxcked up so I don't get all these people trying to justify it! Virginity has nothing to do with age. I'm 23 and I haven't even been kissed yet. I also live with my parents. 18 is legal in most states, and I believe 17 is legal sexual consent age in New York (where I'm sure Madonna has lived for most of her life?) and you can be as young as 15 to give sexual consent in other countries. Maybe 14 even. It's not defending. Just simple fact. And it's not like this actually happened. It's fiction. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUO YI 6,089 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 1 minute ago, yASSsss said: no i mean,she was a teenager in the 70's (if we're to believe that she had this experience when she was a teenager ) but yeah,the book came out in the 90's Thank you for telling me The night sky tells all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elijahfan 25,520 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 And how is this supposed to be alarming...? It didn't sound like she raped that boy at all, and nothing in this text tells us whether he was below the age of consent or not. This may be breaking news to you, but having sex with an underage person isn't illegal as long as this person has reached the age of consent. He was a teenager, not a child, take a chill pill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
petty 9,412 Posted May 22, 2016 Author Share Posted May 22, 2016 3 minutes ago, StrawberryBlond said: Whether it was real or not, that is a pretty sick fantasy. Now, while there was no mention of him actually being underage, she sure put in a lot of graphic descriptions that suggested that he was very young, under-age young: "teenage boy," "a virgin," "barely any pubic hair," "he never went to school," "he wasn't very big, he was a baby." None of this is coincidental, it's meant to be titillating and appeal to your darker, creepy side. And that's all very well...but don't bring borderline underage characters into it. If they're young, make it blatantly clear that they are legal. But don't overemphasise the youth, don't fetishise the youth, don't make it sound like they are attractive purely because of their youth. But she's doing all these things here and its disgraceful. Let's put this another way...take this passage and switch the genders. It's a man talking about sex with a teenage girl, that she was a virgin and had barely any pubic hair and didn't go to school and hung out at his house and slept over at his when her parents kicked her out. Now, would you say: "don't judge, it's just harmless fantasy?" No, a man wouldn't get away with writing this. Notice when the subject is a boy, some of you said he had barely any public hair because he was a late developer or shaved? That shouldn't be the train of thought you go down when you hear this. But if it was a girl described as having no pubic hair, would you assume she was a late developer or had shaved? No, you'd assume she was underage. Because we look at boys and girls sexual situations differently. At the end of the day, this was one hell of a creepy story, real or not. And it's wrong how women are not questioned when they appear to have sick fantasies involving very young boys but when men do it, they're villified. Some feminism. thank you! GGD doesn't deserve someone as articulate and thoughtful as you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.