Hillary: I Will Be The Nominee, It’s Done

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

18 minutes ago, IWantTheFame said:

Hillary Clinton set up an illegal, off-site server and illegally transmitted thousands of extremely sensitive classified emails, breaching the security of many American agents as well as top-secret government programs. 

What?

I get why you might think like this if you only watched Fox News. Otherwise this is very off-base.

The e-mails weren't classified at the time. In fact they were only retroactively classified. They are most definitely not extremely sensitive nor top secret.

Furthermore, even Obama stated that those e-mails contained information that was already available in public sources, but that you just didn't want to be publicized.

Also you use breaching very loosely. No information nor security was breached. In fact, that server was likely more secure than the State's own servers. Anyone with IT knowledge would know. So if that's making you lose sleep, then don't worry.

[Goosey 3,017]

8 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

Where'd you get this from lol  

r/the_Donald. You'd like it there.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 minute ago, Goosey said:

r/the_Donald. You'd like it there.

oh hell no lol

[venusfly 17,885]

9 minutes ago, IWantTheFame said:

Where did I assume anything? Hillary Clinton set up an illegal, off-site server

She did not. The server belonged to the family for years and Hillary used it even before she was secretary of state. When she got her position she continued to use her own personal email, rather than move to the government's system. Her investigation is because of her supposed carelessness rather than malicious intent to hide her communications.

[socotra 3,357]

She'll be an effective president and I hope her administration is as clean as Obama's has been scandal-wise. Really hoping she sticks to the agenda she's pushed throughout the primary and doesn't backtrack. Definitely would increase my respect for her if she did. 

[Sid 6,755]

2 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

What?

The e-mails weren't classified at the time. In fact they were only retroactively classified. They are most definitely not extremely sensitive nor top secret.

Furthermore, even Obama stated that those e-mails contained information that were already available in public sources, but that you just didn't want to be publicized.

Also you use breaching very loosely. No information nor security was breached. In fact, that server was likely more secure than the State's own servers, as anyone with hint of IT knowledge would know. So if that's making you lose sleep, then don't worry.

 

 

What are you talking about? Have you read these emails? Let's take a look at the article you posted. 

 

So, the real focus is likely to be a narrower set of messages: 65 deemed “Secret” and 22 deemed “Top Secret.” Because of the nature of email, the actual amount of highly sensitive information is more limited than those numbers suggest. The 22 “Top Secret” messages consist of seven “threads,” presumably with the same classified subject matter discussed in each email in the thread.
 

So there were definitely Top Secret emails on her server.

 

Next, you're saying no information was breached. Let's look at the article again.

In his interview with POLITICO, Giuliani contended that Clinton’s server was a more serious breach than the one Petraeus committed because her actions continued over years and made the records vulnerable to being obtained by spies or terrorists. “This woman was displaying it for the world,” he said.
 

It’s also unclear whether the information was less secure on Clinton’s home server than on the State Department’s unclassified email system used to send most of the now-classified messages to her in the first place. State’s system was an obvious target and has been repeatedly broken into by the Russian government, U.S. officials have said.

“We know for a fact there was a compromise of State’s unclassified server,” said Aftergood. “Did [Clinton] exacerbate that threat by her use of a private server? Possibly, but we really don’t know.”

 

 

 

In any case, this is who we want representing us? Someone that's going to skirt our nation's security policies whenever she feels like it? I can't believe anybody is still defending her. What she did was wrong, period. And it wasn't a one time thing, she sent these unsecured emails repeatedly, showing a blatant disregard for the laws in place and the security of those identities involved.

[Spyro 8,438]

44 minutes ago, Goosey said:

Well, she might be in jail. 

 

somebody photoshop a phone in his hand with tinder on it.

[PaperIz 7,354]

2 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

Really? I thought you were going to be a hesitant voter. You said so yourself.

Well that's too bad.

I've changed my mind. I refuse to vote for someone I don't trust.

[PartySick 172,521]

2 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

Rihported 

Sis wait  did you actually report me for that?

[lego 44,165]

7 minutes ago, PartySick said:

Sis wait  did you actually report me for that?

 

Did you get your first wp? 

[Jase 13,417]

No warn points discussion. Please keep on topic

[Morphine Prince 109,655]

24 minutes ago, Jase said:

No warn points discussion. Please keep on topic

Jase, be honest. The mods must be fed up with the reports coming from the political threads, huh?  

 

[Guest]

5 hours ago, PartySick said:

What kind of country are we that we'd elect an establishment lesbian warhawk as president?

Lesbian Warhawk?!? Lol

[Guest]

4 hours ago, IWantTheFame said:

What are you talking about? Have you read these emails? Let's take a look at the article you posted. 

 

So, the real focus is likely to be a narrower set of messages: 65 deemed “Secret” and 22 deemed “Top Secret.” Because of the nature of email, the actual amount of highly sensitive information is more limited than those numbers suggest. The 22 “Top Secret” messages consist of seven “threads,” presumably with the same classified subject matter discussed in each email in the thread.
 

So there were definitely Top Secret emails on her server.

 

Next, you're saying no information was breached. Let's look at the article again.

In his interview with POLITICO, Giuliani contended that Clinton’s server was a more serious breach than the one Petraeus committed because her actions continued over years and made the records vulnerable to being obtained by spies or terrorists. “This woman was displaying it for the world,” he said.
 

It’s also unclear whether the information was less secure on Clinton’s home server than on the State Department’s unclassified email system used to send most of the now-classified messages to her in the first place. State’s system was an obvious target and has been repeatedly broken into by the Russian government, U.S. officials have said.

“We know for a fact there was a compromise of State’s unclassified server,” said Aftergood. “Did [Clinton] exacerbate that threat by her use of a private server? Possibly, but we really don’t know.”

 

 

 

In any case, this is who we want representing us? Someone that's going to skirt our nation's security policies whenever she feels like it? I can't believe anybody is still defending her. What she did was wrong, period. And it wasn't a one time thing, she sent these unsecured emails repeatedly, showing a blatant disregard for the laws in place and the security of those identities involved.

Don't even try to argue with people who are Trump supporters or Sanders supporters, they've already convinced themselves that she is a tyrant bent on world destruction, and her charity work and and life as First Lady proves it apparently. 

[Guest]

4 hours ago, IWantTheFame said:

How does she just ignore the fact that she's under FBI INVESTIGATION? Can't run for president in prison 

They're investigating because it's protocol to when a government email is hacked/leaks emails. They have to investigate for her protection, not just because she's hiding something or there was scandal hidden somewhere. Of course Fox News and the conservative media will tell you different