Rigged Election: Nevada's Real Story!

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 minute ago, just4fun said:

Sometimes I think you are a Donald supporter in disguise but then you opened up that ridiculous thread about Gaga that was closed the other day and I realize your just a troll looking for a fight. 

I realized that a while back.

[Morphine Prince 110,013]

Lol at this thread. I'm over the primaries already. 

**** both parties. 

We all know Hillary will win the presidency anyway. Been knowing that since she announced she was running. 

[JevyDuty 2,961]

Bernie is literally splitting the party apart. His supporters would like to say that it's our voting for Hillary that's going to cost us the election, but I think Bernie and his supporters will cost us the election. They just can't get over the lose. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

3 minutes ago, Larry Hill said:

Bernie is literally splitting the party apart. His supporters would like to say that it's our voting for Hillary that's going to cost us the election, but I think Bernie and his supporters will cost us the election. They just can't get over the lose. 

Eh don't worry. Hillary had her own share of rabid supporters a decade ago but they ended mostly voting for Obama. Things will settle down once the Democratic race is over.

[Goosey 3,017]

5 minutes ago, Larry Hill said:

... I think Bernie and his supporters will cost us the election.

You say "us" as if "Bernie and his supporters" are part of the same group as Clinton and her supporters, but that's not necessarily true.

[Titzlol 607]

26 minutes ago, Larry Hill said:

Bernie is literally splitting the party apart. His supporters would like to say that it's our voting for Hillary that's going to cost us the election, but I think Bernie and his supporters will cost us the election. They just can't get over the lose. 

This I use to be confident in Hillary winning but because of how torn we are... I dont know anymore and all the media does is hype trump trump trump like, its scary

 

1 hour ago, Morphine Prince said:

Lol at this thread. I'm over the primaries already. 

**** both parties. 

We all know Hillary will win the presidency anyway. Been knowing that since she announced she was running. 

YOUR AVI LMFAO

 

EDIT: I CANNOT get over how funny that is! :lmao: Someone whould edit the gif where beyonce is holding her baseball bat and instead its bernies head over beyonce's and the bat is named "revolution" instead of hot suace

[Titzlol 607]

2 hours ago, brendablethyn said:

If Bernie can't win, then he is going to take Hillary down with him  Serves the establishment right

Why would you want that? Trump presidency is probably the worst thing I could think of. taking her down would only be, omg i dont wanna think about that 4 years of trump   DONALD TRUMP YOU GUYS.

[PaperIz 7,354]

I can't blame them for being upset. If you just look in this thread you see how this election is upsetting everyone. I hate Trump and Hillary. I don't want either of them as my president.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

10 minutes ago, PaperIz said:

I can't blame them for being upset. If you just look in this thread you see how this election is upsetting everyone. I hate Trump and Hillary. I don't want either of them as my president.

Well put on your big boy pants and do what's right in the current situation.

[Mast 980]

3 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

You ****ing kidding?

Hillary won the caucus which estimated the delegate count at 20 - 15.

Then in the second step at the county level convention, the Sanders supporters outnumbered the Clinton supporters and gained some of the estimated delegates back for Bernie.

Now at the state level convention today, the Clinton supporters outnumbered the Sanders supporters and the delegate count ends up back where it started as 20 -15 in favor of Clinton. The same result as was estimated based on the caucus results.

So, they are mad that the delegates they stole from Clinton at the county level, got stolen back at the state level by Clinton. They are mad that the end results actually reflect the results of the original caucus.

----
 

That you tacitly approve of this barbaric uncivil performance is beyond the pale.

NO ONE has the right to be a total asshole, and start physical altercations, regardless of how exasperated you are with the process and it's imperfect human imperfections.

Maturity, cooperation, cordiality, patience and RESPECT accomplish much more, yet are the first things to be rejected.

That's why RULES of Order are named exactly that.

---

Me asking you if you watched the issue wasn't being condescending. It was the complete opposite. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt after reading your remarkably dismissive statement.

You and your ilk can start your own goddamn Tea Party if you want to. Leave the Democrat constituency out of this.

Sorry, do you have evidence to back up for claims of physical altercations? Because that's neither in the article your posted nor the footage provided. 

Yes, the original split was 20-15, but no one did any stealing at the country convention. Hillary's voters just didn't show up, plain and simple. How hard is that to get? Again, at the state level this reversed itself, but do you really not see the legitimacy of asking for a recount when the amount of votes for each candidate was so close? Of course they're going to want to contest it, Bernie is still in the running. Whether you agree with the outcome or not, this is the way that our democratic system works. You also have to understand that elections in no way represent the actual sentiment of the majority of the country, as millions of people are barred from voting every election (see NY and Arizona)

Also, you were completely being condescending, and you've been so toward me whenever I disagree with your polarizing statements. If anyone was being dismissive, it was you. I was not coming for you, I was coming for the author of the article for calling people "aggressive" and "chaotic" when all they were doing was demand a recount. That had nothing to do with you so I don't know why you're taking it so personally. 

And you're still being condescending by telling me to start "my own tea party". Disagreeing with you doesn't make me not a Democrat, and the point of politics is to have discourse where dissenting opinions can be listened to and examined. You're being polarizing as **** and not allowing that to happen, basically shutting anyone who doesn't see things the way you do down. Honestly, grow the **** up and understand that the U.S.'s democratic system is heavily flawed and inefficient, so things like this are bound to happen and THEY ALWAYS DO. This is not Bernie exclusive. Bernie or Bust is not new, Hillary's supporters ran the same ideology in 2008. Of course, that's not the way things turn out, and I doubt that it's gonna be any different with Bernie, but Hillary or Bust was still there, and she also did have "aggressive" supporters willing to exercise their rights in order to see their candidate win. 

 

 

[PaperIz 7,354]

53 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

Well put on your big boy pants and do what's right in the current situation.

What's right in your opinion is not what I believe is right, sorry. Hilary is corrupt and I refuse to vote for her. The people in this thread expect us to "fall in line" and I will not. Parties don't define who I want to win and if Bernie out then I don't feel like my vote should be given to Clinton just because she's a democrat.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 hour ago, Mast said:

*snip fail post*

The physical altercations did not happen during this rally. They did during a Trump Chicago rally.

Is that how you demand recounts? By boo'ing non-stop, being disruptive, and outright rude? Stop excusing this behavior.

Also stop implying that a "majority" of people didn't get to vote. Yeah no **** if you are not registered to vote for the DEMOCRATIC primary then it's your goddamn fault. The rules have been said since forever. Are you seriously implying that individuals who have NEVER participated in the Democratic party should be allowed to influence the DEMOCRATIC primary? Hell I wouldn't people who don't participate in the political process to have ANY influence at all. How ****ed up is that logic?

You guys don't even take civics courses. That you have to constantly be informed by a foreigner is pathetic. I have zero empathy for people who don't participate in the political process then cry foul when they cannot because of their own laziness or failure. 

Then there's your implication that they'd all even vote for Bernie to begin with. HA! Don't make me laugh.

And stop bringing up the past as if it's relevant today. I'm fully aware that Clinton had rabid supporters of her own a decade ago. I'd call them idiots back then and I'm calling their current iteration idiots now.

I'm fully aware that nothing is perfect. If only you'd apply that logic to how you view Bernie's idealism. The entire reason why I support Hillary over her is that I'm fully aware that none of his plans will get anywhere because the US. democratic system is flawed and inefficient.

Holy ****. The irony in your post is hilarious. The entirety of your last two paragraphs is nothing but demeaning and condescending to the nth degree. 

Feel free to write several more paragraphs rationalizing how you're the victim here. I am literally telling you that I'm not being condescending.

Grow a pair and stop taking every stern rejection of your beliefs as being condescending. I can think your opinion is ****ing stupid without being condescending to your person, because guess what, you can have ****ing stupid opinions without being stupid. My thinking that my opinion is better formed from facts and actual evidence is not being condescending. It's being more rational.

Get informed. All of your posts are nothing but theorizing and self-victimization. 

Now THAT is a condescending statement.

[JevyDuty 2,961]

2 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

Eh don't worry. Hillary had her own share of rabid supporters a decade ago but they ended mostly voting for Obama. Things will settle down once the Democratic race is over.

I know... I was one of them. It was my first time being able to vote and she was my first vote lol. It WAS hard to lose. The difference is that the rhetoric and the actions by the losing candidate are very different this time around. Hillary wasn't suing and attacking the DNC at every opportunity. I'm just saying.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

26 minutes ago, PaperIz said:

What's right in your opinion is not what I believe is right, sorry. Hilary is corrupt and I refuse to vote for her. The people in this thread expect us to "fall in line" and I will not. Parties don't define who I want to win and if Bernie out then I don't feel like my vote should be given to Clinton just because she's a democrat.

?

Where did I say that you should do what's right according to me?

Do what you want. Just stop complaining when the issue is out of your hands and do what you think is best according to the current situation. Just exercise proper judgement because your decision does not only influence you.

 I honestly wish the self-victimization and demonization here would stop.

[PaperIz 7,354]

2 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

?

Where did I say that you should do what's right according to me?

Do what you want. Just stop complaining when the issue is out of your hands and do what you think is best according to the current situation. Just exercise proper judgement because your decision does not only influence you.

 I honestly wish the self-victimization and demonization here would stop.

You're reply literally told me to do what was right though lol. Like I literally replied to exactly what you said. Want to call that complaining and self victimization? Fine  also I was just giving my opinion to this thread and what we're discussing so yeah