Jump to content
politics

Emails From Hillary Clinton’s Server Admin Missing


FATCAT

Featured Posts

FATCAT

The State Department said today it can’t find Bryan Pagliano’s emails from the time he served as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s senior information technology staffer during her tenure there.

Pagliano would have been required to turn over any official communications from his work account before he left the government. State Department officials say he had an official email account, but that they can't find any of those records he would have turned over and continue to search for them.

“The Department has searched for Mr. Pagliano’s email pst file and has not located one that covers the time period of Secretary Clinton’s tenure,” State Department spokesman Elizabeth Trudeau said today, referencing a file format that holds email.

“To be clear, the Department does have records related to Mr. Pagliano and we are working with Congress and [Freedom of Information Act] requesters to provide relevant material. The Department has located a pst from Mr. Pagliano’s recent work at the Department as a contractor, but the files are from after Secretary Clinton left the Department," Trudeau added.

Pagliano was responsible for setting up the now-infamous private server in the basement of the Clinton's home in Chappaqua, New York. He has since become a key witness in the FBI inquiry into the handling of sensitive material on that server and has been granted immunity by the Justice Department in exchange for his cooperation.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/emails-found-hillary-clintons-senior-staffer-state-department/story?id=38989504

 

Looks like Hillary is trying to clean up her tracks. :green:

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

LebaneseDude
Just now, Didymus said:

Queen of.. Translucency was it? @LebaneseDude :chica:

Clearly Hillary has nothing to do with this :green:

Edited just now by LebaneseDude.
Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
Just now, LebaneseDude said:

Clearly Hillary has nothing to do with this :green:

He has immunity, essentially. She's the only one that benefits from those emails dissapearing.

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Didymus
5 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

Clearly Hillary has nothing to do with this :green:

That's a joke right? :green:

Still not sure if I get your sense of humor :unicorn:

Link to post
Share on other sites

LebaneseDude
Just now, Didymus said:

That's a joke right? :green:

Still not sure if I get your sense of humor :unicorn:

One way to know if I'm not being serious is my usage of emoticons. :staymad:

Edited just now by LebaneseDude.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Didymus
Just now, LebaneseDude said:

One way to know if I'm not being serious is my usage of emoticons. :staymad:

Thought so :diane:

Link to post
Share on other sites

LebaneseDude
1 minute ago, Morphine Prince said:

How convenient. 

I know right. I wonder if he scrapped them all in panic when he found out that the server had been discovered by US authorities. It's odd how thorough he was.

Edited just now by LebaneseDude.
Link to post
Share on other sites

MJHolland

Honestly if someone isn't indicted at the end of all this, the American people should and will be furious. You cannot just delete over half of a server that you know is under legal contention and just get away with it. If a republican has done this, they'd be indicted already. Smh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Americano
4 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

Honestly if someone isn't indicted at the end of all this, the American people should and will be furious. You cannot just delete over half of a server that you know is under legal contention and just get away with it. If a republican has done this, they'd be indicted already. Smh.

There's nothing illegal about what she did though? Lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

MJHolland
Just now, Americano said:

There's nothing illegal about what she did though? Lol

Mishandling of top secret information that could pose a national security risk if hackers got it? Lol are you drunk or just dim?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

LebaneseDude
1 hour ago, MJHolland said:

Mishandling of top secret information that could pose a national security risk if hackers got it? Lol are you drunk or just dim?!

It was never top secret lol ... even Obama said it was just information that you can obtain in any open public source, but didn't want to be publicized.

It wasn't even classified at the time. It was only retroactively classified later.

Also hackers never got it, and Clinton never had any malicious intent by sharing it with anyone.

There is no precedent for someone who only exhibited negligence for getting indicted, especially when nobody ended up getting harmed.

If people are furious about it then they should probably look at themselves first.

Edited just now by LebaneseDude.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...