Maddow Performs Poetry Reading Of GOP Anti-Trump Anguish

[Luiz 4,253]

1 hour ago, FATCAT said:

I love how you place destruction of American in between a vote for Hillary or Bernie when the truth is that the countries future is on the shoulders of Trump or the Dem. Nominee.. Many polls have placed Bernie as doing better than Trump in a General Election. You should be saying "Let's nominate the candidate with the best chance of Defeating Trump."

That's Bernie.

Also, marginalizing an entire generation, including me and many other supporters, on the basis that they're just disgruntled and looking for an excuse?  As an American, as a millennial working my ass off in school, politely **** off. Take your elitist attitude elsewhere.

it really is bernie that could unify the party. hillary supporters are just people who cling to the nut sack of the democratic party so whoever the nominee is, they will support. bernie supporters on the other hand could be lost to trump which means less votes for the dems. if bernie is the nom then all dems would vote democrat. 

 

bernie supporters are threatening party disunity if hilldog is the nom. they are political terrorists tbh, except they're actually entertaining to watch. ALLAU AKBERN!

[FATCAT 60,888]

1 minute ago, LebaneseDude said:

I've already told you why she won't be transparent about this case. It would do more damage to release them. 

There's much more danger in the unknown than the known.

[Morphine Prince 109,655]

2 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

I've already told you why she won't be transparent about this case. It would do more damage to release them. Stop ignoring the realities to justify your own position. 

It would do more damage because she possibly said something that could be perceived as "pro-Wall St." or whatever you wanna call it? 

Interesting. Even if she was "courteous" during the speeches. Very interesting. I guess we'll never know since she won't release them. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

2 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

I don't have time like you do to write essays to the opposition. If I did, I'd consider using my time as a political columnist. My lack of time isn't ignorance, it's the fact that actually defending him to you is useless. If someone said to me "Hey, I don't know whether I should vote for Bernie or Trump, because.." I'd have a bit more concern than you just trying to take up my time.

Lol k nice justification. Just outright say that you have no defense OK?

Unlike you I'm actually capable of debate and can concede points. You don't even try. You put so much effort into blasting Hillary on this website, I thought that you at least knew what you were talking about when it came to Sanders.

Thanks for proving me right. You know nothing. How much I care? Less than nothing.

We're done here.

[Morphine Prince 109,655]

3 minutes ago, Luiz said:

it really is bernie that could unify the party. hillary supporters are just people who cling to the nut sack of the democratic party so whoever the nominee is, they will support. bernie supporters on the other hand could be lost to trump which means less votes for the dems. if bernie is the nom then all dems would vote democrat. 

 

bernie supporters are threatening party disunity if hilldog is the nom. they are political terrorists tbh, except they're actually entertaining to watch. ALLAU AKBERN!

LMFAO  

 

[FATCAT 60,888]

1 minute ago, Luiz said:

it really is bernie that could unify the party. hillary supporters are just people who cling to the nut sack of the democratic party so whoever the nominee is, they will support. bernie supporters on the other hand could be lost to trump which means less votes for the dems. if bernie is the nom then all dems would vote democrat. 

 

bernie supporters are threatening party disunity if hilldog is the nom. they are political terrorists tbh, except they're actually entertaining to watch. ALLAU AKBERN!

Half of the party, or slightly under half of the party, are concerned for their parties direction. It's not wrong to want to change your party from the inside out. We don't want to support a candidate that is against us behind closed doors. Besides, I'm sure a majority of Bernie supporters will vote Hillary if the race was close. Like I've said, it's better to live with the evil you know, than the evil you don't.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 minute ago, Morphine Prince said:

It would do more damage because she possibly said something that could be perceived as "pro-Wall St." or whatever you wanna call it? 

Interesting. Even if she was "courteous" during the speeches. Very interesting. I guess we'll never know since she won't release them. 

Never heard a paid speech before?  

I've been to dozens of conventions. They're not there to criticize the host. They are there to praise their efforts. Nothing interesting about it.

Please make an effort to understand these things.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

3 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

There's much more danger in the unknown than the known.

Not when the media exists dear.

[Morphine Prince 109,655]

Just now, LebaneseDude said:

Never heard a paid speech before?  

I've been to dozens of conventions. They're not there to criticize the host. They are there to praise their efforts.

Of course I know they're paid speeches. Notice how I never said it was wrong for her to get paid? 

We want to know what she praised. There should be no issue. Be transparent to your voters. 

[FATCAT 60,888]

Just now, LebaneseDude said:

Not when the media exists dear.

Are you saying that you know how Trump will do as president? I don't think he'll be good for America, but I don't know to what extent. I'm much more comfortable knowing he's not in office. I don't know to what extent Hillary will be good or bad for America, but at least she has a history in our government.

[Morphine Prince 109,655]

4 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

Please make an effort to understand these things.

You are being very condescending. 

People have repeatedly told you on here your tone comes off as very offensive at times. Just because people don't agree with you doesn't mean they aren't making an effort to understand.

Now, THAT'S insulting. 

[Whispering 18,865]

58 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

Her viewers share her condescending and patronizing view towards the world. 

Her viewers are liberals/progressives. Rachel has been incredibly supportive of Bernie and his campaign. The majority of Bernie supporters adore her and have enjoyed the extremely positive support that MSNBC and Maddow have given Bernie and all of his people throughout this campaign. 

Your comment shows how out of touch you are with everything besides stating the same "crooked Hillary" hate line over and over. 

[Whispering 18,865]

7 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

Of course I know they're paid speeches. Notice how I never said it was wrong for her to get paid? 

We want to know what she praised. There should be no issue. Be transparent to your voters. 

Right. That's why Bernie has released all of his tax records....the entirety of them, including the itemized pages. He isn't transparent to his voters. 

Releasing tax records is something that is expected. Transcripts of any speech you've ever given as a private citizen is not something that has ever been expected. There is no reason to start now. Once Hillary and Trump start their official general election run, both can release every transcript they've ever given as a private citizen if that is something that is truly deemed important. 

Trump is also going to have to release his tax records. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

15 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

You are being very condescending. 

People have repeatedly told you on here your tone comes off as very offensive at times. Just because people don't agree with you doesn't mean they aren't making an effort to understand.

Now, THAT'S insulting. 

It's not. I'm asking you to make an effort to understand how paid speeches work in both context and pay. I didn't mock you for not knowing it.

Come on MP. You know better. I'm criticizing your knowledge of the material based on what you've said, not your intelligence nor your capacity to undrerstand it. You are misinformed. That is all.

[Morphine Prince 109,655]

Just now, Whispering said:

Right. That's why Bernie has released all of his tax records....the entirety of them, including the itemized pages. He isn't transparent to his voters. 

Releasing tax records is something that is expected. Transcripts of any speech you've ever given as a private citizen is not something that has ever been expected. There is no reason to start now. Once Hillary and Trump start their official general election run, both can release every transcript they've ever given as a private citizen if that is something that is truly deemed important. 

Trump is also going to have to release his tax records. 

Right, that's why I think he should and isn't being completely transparent. 

I'm not delusional. Don't try to paint me with the same brush.

Well, I'll be waiting for the transcripts then.