LG5 isn't going to have dance music

[MaryJaneHolland 77,348]

1 hour ago, vanus said:

did u watch bowie tribute

she didn't have an actual choreography..... 

"Pop music will never be low-brow", so.......

[Lord Temptation 11,209]

41 minutes ago, Ronlop said:

Lol what?

Of course she did it to spread awareness. I didn't even argue on that. 

So then why did you reply to me three times?

[Hexxx 2,244]

It's possible that some of these duets are probably for separate projects. Not just LG5. 

[AnglerfishbraBENUS 5,734]

Everyone needs to RELAX.  I don't care if there is dance music as long as there is good music 

[Harry 26,836]

Well yes it's been implied that it won't be dance/electronic, but that doesn't mean there won't be uptempo tracks. Of course there will be some ballads, but Gaga hasn't ever released an album full of songs that are the same. They all have uptempo, mid-tempo and slow paced tracks, and I doubt this is going to be any different.

Just because something isn't uptempo, dance and electronically based, doesn't mean it isn't pop. Pop as a term covers a wide range of styles. The only thing she has released that isn't pop is C2C. Yes TIHTY is a pop song.

Also the confirmed collaborators for this album are not exclusive to slow/ballad type songs, either. RedOne and Nile Rodgers specifically are probably the opposite of that. And Mark Ronson really isn't known for slow songs lol. Sure he has produced some, but... Uptown Funk, Valerie, Bang Bang Bang, Locked Out of Heaven etc say hello. He's extremely versatile.

[Jesse Pinkman 4,660]

No one is here for Gaga releasing an album full of ballads. People want to hear her release great pop music. That's it. That's why ARTPOP wasn't well received because people weren't here for the noisy EDM. 

Anyway, Gaga and Bobby have both confirmed that the album will be pop, and all of the producers are known for dance music. I do believe we will hear a few ballads, but over all the album will be a retro pop bop.

[gagzus 15,930]

She is primarily and will always be, a dance musician so

[Sister 9,907]

This is very interesting and I would be highly interested to hear Lady Gaga do this. Gaga does need some growth in her music and she is highly capable of achieving greatness and still sounding involved in this current period. I think that it is only up to herself to push herself. I feel like others would just take the same Gaga sound as always and think that that alone is enough, just to simply make money and stay in the game.

"Elton John saying that he heard two songs and they "aren't complex but great songs" and compared the album to "Gaga's own version of 'Tapestry'" which is a Carole King's album (Which is far from being dance music). "

[Chelseaaaaaa 1,453]

LOL so many ppl are salty at the tea you spilled. yikes.

[Reidstar 321]

NOT here for Gaga to do this new trendy mid-tempo stoner trappy **** like Rihanna, Zayn, the Weeknd and every one else is doing (don't get me wrong a lot of it is good but my point is THAT is the current trend in music and I don't want her to conform to that) 

I personally think LG5 will be a well rounded album that truly sticks to who she is. I think she will explore maybe some new genres with rock or disco elements for a few songs, maybe a few more ballads, stripped down production, but as a whole she will stick to dance pop (not neccesarily EDM) but synth pop like The Fame/Fame Monster and BTW. The main thing to remember is ARTPOP was very beat and DJ driven where she just wrote lyrics and melodies to pre-existing productions that Zedd and Madeon and DJWS sent her. (I'm not saying they weren't collaborative) But her previous albums she composed many of the instrumentations too - I think she will go back to that writing style (which is why it's taken longer) and HER VOICE will stand out more above the music like it did on Cheek to Cheek.

[Brooke Candy 3,970]

On 1-4-2016 at 10:26 PM, Ronlop said:

I really doubt we'll get dance songs this album or any bops actually.

 

[Guest ARTPOPSlays]

1 hour ago, Sister said:

This is very interesting and I would be highly interested to hear Lady Gaga do this. Gaga does need some growth in her music and she is highly capable of achieving greatness and still sounding involved in this current period. I think that it is only up to herself to push herself. I feel like others would just take the same Gaga sound as always and think that that alone is enough, just to simply make money and stay in the game.

"Elton John saying that he heard two songs and they "aren't complex but great songs" and compared the album to "Gaga's own version of 'Tapestry'" which is a Carole King's album (Which is far from being dance music). "

I feel as though something inspirational, like The Queen, Hair, Yoü and I type songs would be great along with a few songs like Bad Romance and Sheiße would be great! However, Elton didn't compare it to Tapestry he said she should make her own Tapestry. But I'll be happy with whatever she puts out, I love her in general with everything she does.

[Poot 719]

commercial edm music like ARTPOP sucks anyway, im hoping she goes on a more creative route. but not here for boring piano ballads

[Delulu Rogers 7,296]

Didn't she say tho her gaga side was resting up for this album? So i think we'll get dance music. Also she really needs a simple, catchy song to become mainstream again anyways. Also, i can't find this interview but didn't she say simething like "people want songs like poker face and bad romance, and i'm happy to give them that" Does anyone else remember this???

[aaronyoji 2,054]

not having dance music per se doesnt mean just slow or mid tempo, above all im just hoping its evolved, mature, and more adult-contemporary and timeless. id love for her to make fiona apple-meets stevie nicks-meets heart esque music.