dannydevito 10,658 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Meghan Trainor may have learned a thing or two about the art of hair flips when she worked with the ladies of Fifth Harmony, and it looks like she's taking the art form out for a spin. Trainor shared a glimpse at her upcoming music video for current single "No" on Instagram early Wednesday morning (March 16). It's sort of goth, sort of shiny, sort of spiritiual and, yes, sort of reckless in the hair department. Read More: http://www.fuse.tv/2016/03/meghan-trainor-no-video-teaser I thought she was going to be one of those artists that keep on using the same style during their entire career because they think it is a warranty of success but this is gold Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weed 73,859 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 She's branching off ha Target music videos! I can't see this relating to the lyrics, but it's just a still so maybe it'll be a wild story in full Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Child 18,997 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Please be good! Please a good music video! ‘If religion be the cause of disunity, then irreligion is surely to be preferred.’ ‘Abdu’l-Bahá Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanye West 1,676 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 2 minutes ago, dannydevito said: I thought she was going to be one of those artists that keep on using the same style during their entire career because they think it is a warranty of success but this is gold Or maybe they do it because they have a strong sense of identity? This whole idea that artists have to change in order to be more credible is incredibly stupid and unnecessary. KANYEWEST.COM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannydevito 10,658 Posted March 16, 2016 Author Share Posted March 16, 2016 Just now, mirandavlogz said: Or maybe they do it because they have a strong sense of identity? This whole idea that artists have to change in order to be more credible is incredibly stupid and unnecessary. The majority do it because management say so...Anyways, I'm pretty sure you can't survive in the industry with the same style forever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharamon 6,839 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 This photo looks very...Adele'ish Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacify Him 9,073 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Omg she looks like another Adele. The pop Adele. I can't wait I’m getting on your nerves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanye West 1,676 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Just now, dannydevito said: The majority do it because management say so...Anyways, I'm pretty sure you can't survive in the industry with the same style forever. No they don't. You do. I don't see how having a strong sense of identity without wanting to change means you aren't going to survive in the industry. That's a pretty dumb assumption. Change can also ruin careers, such as Bionic. Lack of quality releases kills careers, not staying the same. KANYEWEST.COM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannydevito 10,658 Posted March 16, 2016 Author Share Posted March 16, 2016 Just now, mirandavlogz said: No they don't. You do. I don't see how having a strong sense of identity without wanting to change means you aren't going to survive in the industry. That's a pretty dumb assumption. Change can also ruin careers, such as Bionic. Lack of quality releases kills careers, not staying the same. I do what? Change is always necessary, and you can either fail or get the biggest hit in your career. No change means no risk and without risking you don't succeed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanye West 1,676 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Just now, dannydevito said: I do what? Change is always necessary, and you can either fail or get the biggest hit in your career. No change means no risk and without risking you don't succeed. You say that management tells artists to stay the same, when in reality a lot of artists simply know exactly who they are and do not wish to change for shallow reasons. And no. Change is not necessary unless you want to change. Changing and taking risks are not the same thing. KANYEWEST.COM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Child 18,997 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 5 minutes ago, mirandavlogz said: No they don't. You do. I don't see how having a strong sense of identity without wanting to change means you aren't going to survive in the industry. That's a pretty dumb assumption. Change can also ruin careers, such as Bionic. Lack of quality releases kills careers, not staying the same. Ariana Grande decided to not change and release a Problem 2.0, see where she is now. Changing can also be good. ‘If religion be the cause of disunity, then irreligion is surely to be preferred.’ ‘Abdu’l-Bahá Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanye West 1,676 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Just now, CrazyMonster said: Ariana Grande decided to not change and release a Problem 2.0, see where she is now. Changing can also be good. No she didn't. She released an awful song which is nowhere near as good as problem. Cheaply imitating past work is not the same as having a consistent image. KANYEWEST.COM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannydevito 10,658 Posted March 16, 2016 Author Share Posted March 16, 2016 Just now, mirandavlogz said: You say that management tells artists to stay the same, when in reality a lot of artists simply know exactly who they are and do not wish to change for shallow reasons. And no. Change is not necessary unless you want to change. Changing and taking risks are not the same thing. No it is not, but the change is risky too. And yes, no one can obligate an artist to change, but with change they show how their artistry is valid within a lot of contexts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miky 9,491 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 BOOBS Too many people here with moral superiority complex. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanye West 1,676 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 2 minutes ago, dannydevito said: No it is not, but the change is risky too. And yes, no one can obligate an artist to change, but with change they show how their artistry is valid within a lot of contexts. None of what you said makes sense. All you're doing is fabricating sentences. Artists can show their artistry is valid with quality releases. Quality and change are not the same thing. Where did Bionic get Christina? Where did ARTPOP get Gaga? The list goes on. KANYEWEST.COM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.