Economy 53,060 Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/12/31/credit-union-embezzlement/78124794/ A woman with a high position at a credit firm brought the company close to insolvency after stuffing nearly $2 Million into her purse over a period of 15 years After being caught and pleding guilty and willing to return all the money she still had not spent, she will serve 7.5 years in jail. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark 4,065 Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 She should have spent some of the money since she's getting that jail time. Just saying... 00026 † 10000 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMKKARDASHiAN 8,570 Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 If they told me I'm still doing time mf bye while I'm out spending the rest of this mill in another country. Byyyyyyye Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 53,060 Posted January 1, 2016 Author Share Posted January 1, 2016 1 hour ago, Mark said: She should have spent some of the money since she's getting that jail time. Just saying... She did i think. Or I assume she must if spent some. Who collects money for 15 years and does nothing with it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 53,060 Posted January 1, 2016 Author Share Posted January 1, 2016 1 hour ago, PMKKARDASHiAN said: If they told me I'm still doing time mf bye while I'm out spending the rest of this mill in another country. Byyyyyyye If she wasnt returning any im sure her time would he longer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mobster 14,604 Posted January 1, 2016 Share Posted January 1, 2016 54 minutes ago, Economy said: She did i think. Or I assume she must if spent some. Who collects money for 15 years and does nothing with it? There's was probably confusion, because the "After being caught and pleding guilty and willing to return all the money she still had unspent" could be interpreted as all of the money not having been spent. But it most likely means she was offering to return what was left of the money. But I'm only a man and I do what I can. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 53,060 Posted January 1, 2016 Author Share Posted January 1, 2016 46 minutes ago, Mobster said: There's was probably confusion, because the "After being caught and pleding guilty and willing to return all the money she still had unspent" could be interpreted as all of the money not having been spent. But it most likely means she was offering to return what was left of the money. Sry i meant to say "not spent". Corrected! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.99c40bc2a10ded8236a48b4fe15c6be8.jpg)
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.