Jump to content
science

2016: China Gets Agressive Against Pollution


Economy

Featured Posts

Sudarshana
1 minute ago, Luc said:

Those are extreme cases... usually it's not that much.

I heard this is pretty common in the northern China in winter, because they burn coal for heating, which is like the worst fuel in terms of ecology.

 

3 minutes ago, Wild said:

You shouldn't have to have such pollution levels to do the right thing. Everyone should focus on creating new sources of power in order to avoid what China is undergoing and to promote a healthier global environment.

Agree.

Nous sommes tous obligés, pour rendre la réalité supportable, d'entretenir en nous quelques petites folies. — Marcel Proust
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad Bromance
55 minutes ago, Sudarshana said:

I heard this is pretty common in the northern China in winter, because they burn coal for heating, which is like the worst fuel in terms of ecology.

Yes, that is correct.  The winter months are the worst for northern Chinese cities.  I just wish the world's governments would be less greedy and would open their eyes to the mess that is air pollution and global warming.  SMH. 

I don't care what you think about unless it is about me.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
39 minutes ago, FlopSlut said:

I can't tell, but your posts are always about real world news. And Cher is always tweeting dat stuff :derpga:

You just need the excess of emojies

I sometimes also make lots of typos and mispells lol

 

but im not her lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
39 minutes ago, Luc said:

Those are extreme cases... usually it's not that much.

 

 

 

Note that China's energy consumption (2012) is 1174 GW. Adding 35GW of renewable energy isn't that much, maybe about 2.5% of total energy (especially considering the energy consumption must be at like 1400+ GW in 2016). It's maybe enough to cover the increase in energy consumption.

Were talking 1 year. Thats not a bad investment

 

and avoiding any new coal plants (the dirtiest of the fossil fuels) is a good goal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
41 minutes ago, Wild said:

You shouldn't have to have such pollution levels to do the right thing. Everyone should focus on creating new sources of power in order to avoid what China is undergoing and to promote a healthier global environment.

When ur so crammed and in geographical regions that dont get as much Ocean cleases its hard

 

also its a developing nation so its hard to balance economic growth with environement. But they are doing a lot to reduce pollution

 

- rising investments in non-fossil fuel energy

- develop consumption based economy (less pollutant than industrial)

- taxes to discourage car use and increase public transportations

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
39 minutes ago, Sudarshana said:

I heard this is pretty common in the northern China in winter, because they burn coal for heating, which is like the worst fuel in terms of ecology.

 

Agree.

It is!

 

produces 50% to 60% more emissions than Crude Oil to generate equivalent amount of enegy...

 

produces over 100% (over double) emissions than Natural Gas for same amount if energy

 

Coal needs to be the first focus of elimination. Its the dirtiest fuel. But its also easier to replace than crude oil...

 

Also to replace crude oil one thing youd need is more Electric cars... If half of electricity still comes from Coal like now, then your not helping the situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

politicqxs

Hopefully they would curb the water pollution too.. Water contamination is more insidious . and it's even harder to make the pollutants in water to disappear 

giving up sodomy and moving to 🇦🇪 converting to ☪ and marrying four girls
Link to post
Share on other sites

The entire world needs to do something honestly. It will probably take quite a few years to find a permanent solution to climate change besides doing what we can do the curb it.

Though it's going to be a tough battle in America because of Republicans who don't believe in Global Warming. This sh!t will kill our world if we don't stop and all they're doing on congress is just holding their bibles and saying "Nope."

At least China will be able to do something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Economy said:

When ur so crammed and in geographical regions that dont get as much Ocean cleases its hard

 

also its a developing nation so its hard to balance economic growth with environement. But they are doing a lot to reduce pollution

 

- rising investments in non-fossil fuel energy

- develop consumption based economy (less pollutant than industrial)

- taxes to discourage car use and increase public transportations

Industry has to be somewhere, it can't just disappear. So if it's not in China, it will go to Vietnam, Bangladesh and India and eventually pollute just as much. A consumption based economy, however, means more total consumption in the world and thus more industry in the world.

But other than that the Chinese government is doing a really good job! Sometimes a dictature can be better than a democracy...

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAMROD

With things happening in Beijing the past couple of weeks or so,

it is about time their government put serious concern at this issue.

So long they get serious handling this, it won't be too late.

It is only a shame they only realize this after their business sector got crippled by this problem.

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ ᶠʳᵒⁿᵗ ᵗᵒʷᵃʳᵈ ᵉⁿᵉᵐʸ (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
4 hours ago, Luc said:

Industry has to be somewhere, it can't just disappear. So if it's not in China, it will go to Vietnam, Bangladesh and India and eventually pollute just as much. A consumption based economy, however, means more total consumption in the world and thus more industry in the world.

But other than that the Chinese government is doing a really good job! Sometimes a dictature can be better than a democracy...

Oh on the industrial part i was refering to reducing pollution in China specifically.

 

Also less pollution isnt the only reason they are increasing consumption

 

i just listed it cause it was one of the reasons even tho not the only one

 

And not all of it is displaced. If you consume a good it has to be manufactured but a service has little production associated with it with the exeption of a few tools you might use with it

 

spending $15 at a packaged products from walmart is worse for environment than spending $15 at the movies or for a haircut

 

If we can learn to enjoy more services and less material things, thats another way of helping environment while still enjoying luxury!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
16 hours ago, Seeka said:

The entire world needs to do something honestly. It will probably take quite a few years to find a permanent solution to climate change besides doing what we can do the curb it.

Though it's going to be a tough battle in America because of Republicans who don't believe in Global Warming. This sh!t will kill our world if we don't stop and all they're doing on congress is just holding their bibles and saying "Nope."

At least China will be able to do something.

Well America is taking some steps.

 

Even small things you dont give much thought to or dont physically see can have a huge impact

 

For instance America is building many new Natural Gas plants to close down Coal Plants

 

that actually has a huge impact cause Coal is the most toxic of the fossil fuels and Natural Gas is the cleanest

 

getting rid of Coal is actually a bigger deal for the environment than getting rid of Oil!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...