StarstruckIllusion 52,787 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 https://twitter.com/wajdinaamneh/status/663665085739593732 *SIGH* why? I mean… its been 3 years-of this same "leak" being totally wrong. The same format, the same tasteless music titles, THE SAME DAMN ANGLE. We know it's fake-so just… why the duck? this is just… it needs to stop. I just wanna know if these were ever accurate, so I can be less annoyed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooke Candy 3,970 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 What's the point of this thread? It's obviously FAKE and AP. Fans who believe that sh*t are just Stupid. buy 'Paper or Plastic' by Brooke candy on iTunes NOW!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spock 20,290 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 It's real. My mother's friend has this cousin whose neighbor's brother works at Interscope and confirmed it who will love me when the night is over Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 52,787 Posted November 10, 2015 Author Share Posted November 10, 2015 9 minutes ago, Brooke Candy said: What's the point of this thread? It's obviously FAKE and AP. Fans who believe that sh*t are just Stupid. It was initially to drag the stupid mother****ers who make and believe in this, but that was too mean Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangerous Man 9,245 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 MessT. I even doubt the album is half way finished. "A little less conversation and a little more touch my body." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAstroLeo 14,424 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 YAAAS on my birthday :Cryga: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
danwasd 2,444 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 'Could This Get Anymore Gay?' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KooKoo 1,014 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 What if it's real?? Dreaming is free Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarryNight 10,106 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 06.06.2016. would be so iconic for album release :koons: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nativenewyorker 1,190 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 Lol you'd think that since they've been pulling this buffoonery since the wait for Born This Way, the creators of these fake leaks would be a little more creative and convincing by now. This document would be totally pointless to create in the early stages of an album by anyone working at Interscope. Listing the producers, release date, tracklist, song runtime, genre, and year like a Wikipedia article. In the recording process, the songs are given to the person/team at Interscope who are green lighting the tracks making it onto the album, (be it Jimmy Iovine or whoever.) Then when they reach enough green lit songs for the album, they are worked on for months more, finally mastered and the track listing is figured out towards the end. But before any recording happens, the album's direction is pitched by Gaga to Interscope, given the go ahead and she updates them as she works. Information like track length isn't relevant in the developing stages and not even finalized until the finished mastered track is complete, and the completion usually happens really close to the release date unless there's a plan to wait for a release window. (However there isn't even an album title even listed here, so that isn't the case.) The genre of the album and it's producers would be completely unnecessary to send to whoever this "leaked" document was intended for. Anyone at Interscope involved in her album would definitely know that kind of information already, given the fact that they're paying for her studio time and are hearing the new songs as she works. I just think it's funny that whoever is making these must think emails like this are actually sent around at Interscope. If you're gonna try to fool people, at least make it believable. Don't write a Wikipedia article description listing producers and the genre of an unfinished, yet to be titled album that somehow has a full tracklist with each individual track length known. Lol like every detail a Stan would need to get hyped. Surprised they didn't put a section that said "Fashion direction: dark, avant garde, Fame Monster-era esque" or something equally predictable. This is getting old kids, step your game up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kattys 4,319 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 *feat. Brian May* YES PLEASE It's so fake, duh... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 52,787 Posted November 10, 2015 Author Share Posted November 10, 2015 6 minutes ago, nativenewyorker said: Lol you'd think that since they've been pulling this buffoonery since the wait for Born This Way, the creators of these fake leaks would be a little more creative and convincing by now. This document would be totally pointless to create in the early stages of an album by anyone working at Interscope. Listing the producers, release date, tracklist, song runtime, genre, and year like a Wikipedia article. In the recording process, the songs are given to the person/team at Interscope who are green lighting the tracks making it onto the album, (be it Jimmy Iovine or whoever.) Then when they reach enough green lit songs for the album, they are worked on for months more, finally mastered and the track listing is figured out towards the end. But before any recording happens, the album's direction is pitched by Gaga to Interscope, given the go ahead and she updates them as she works. Information like track length isn't relevant in the developing stages and not even finalized until the finished mastered track is complete, and the completion usually happens really close to the release date unless there's a plan to wait for a release window. (However there isn't even an album title even listed here, so that isn't the case.) The genre of the album and it's producers would be completely unnecessary to send to whoever this "leaked" document was intended for. Anyone at Interscope involved in her album would definitely know that kind of information already, given the fact that they're paying for her studio time and are hearing the new songs as she works. I just think it's funny that whoever is making these must think emails like this are actually sent around at Interscope. If you're gonna try to fool people, at least make it believable. Don't write a Wikipedia article description listing producers and the genre of an unfinished, yet to be titled album that somehow has a full tracklist with each individual track length known. Lol like every detail a Stan would need to get hyped. Surprised they didn't put a section that said "Fashion direction: dark, avant garde, Fame Monster-era esque" or something equally predictable. This is getting old kids, step your game up this bible long drag >>> Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunny 12,736 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 no its real I like dancin', and ponies.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewUsername 11,424 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 51 minutes ago, nativenewyorker said: Lol you'd think that since they've been pulling this buffoonery since the wait for Born This Way, the creators of these fake leaks would be a little more creative and convincing by now. This document would be totally pointless to create in the early stages of an album by anyone working at Interscope. Listing the producers, release date, tracklist, song runtime, genre, and year like a Wikipedia article. In the recording process, the songs are given to the person/team at Interscope who are green lighting the tracks making it onto the album, (be it Jimmy Iovine or whoever.) Then when they reach enough green lit songs for the album, they are worked on for months more, finally mastered and the track listing is figured out towards the end. But before any recording happens, the album's direction is pitched by Gaga to Interscope, given the go ahead and she updates them as she works. Information like track length isn't relevant in the developing stages and not even finalized until the finished mastered track is complete, and the completion usually happens really close to the release date unless there's a plan to wait for a release window. (However there isn't even an album title even listed here, so that isn't the case.) The genre of the album and it's producers would be completely unnecessary to send to whoever this "leaked" document was intended for. Anyone at Interscope involved in her album would definitely know that kind of information already, given the fact that they're paying for her studio time and are hearing the new songs as she works. I just think it's funny that whoever is making these must think emails like this are actually sent around at Interscope. If you're gonna try to fool people, at least make it believable. Don't write a Wikipedia article description listing producers and the genre of an unfinished, yet to be titled album that somehow has a full tracklist with each individual track length known. Lol like every detail a Stan would need to get hyped. Surprised they didn't put a section that said "Fashion direction: dark, avant garde, Fame Monster-era esque" or something equally predictable. This is getting old kids, step your game up watch stans read your post and step up their game now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,156 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 lmfao it looks so real tbh, someone must have put a lot of effort into creating this but it's fake of course Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.