UmbriaWitch 325 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Tbf, not every artiste has to stand for something or have a meaning. If she wants to be vapid, offering nothing besides colourful, kid friendly images and cute bops, good for her. The consequence of course is that no one ever respects her, and she's never taken seriously, which I guess she's fine with Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miaa 252 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 OMG NY Mag, tell us how you really feel! This is so unnecessary. "How can I protect something so perfect without evil?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korkira 119 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 So many truth spilled, it's so overwhelming.... I've always thought she doesn't have charisma...AT ALL. Nothing changed actually. PRISM is just a perfect example of how music is still on the same level as it was back in 2008. No shifting has been detected nor experienced...but I like her songs and I think she is very creative person! I just think her creativity has been directed in (a lil' bit) wrong direction... I guess... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Peters 10,665 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 This thread is so messy ot: katy is pretty generic but that's what the people like. I dislike Katy as much as the next person but you can't deny that both her and her team know how to get #1's and sales. also, taylor is not innovating so i do not even know why they are trying to put taylor on a pedestal when she's basically on the same level of katy in terms of pushing boundaries. Bringing in a ton of sales isn't groundbreaking, that goes for both of them. emma roberts is an abuser Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creyk 17,371 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Tbf, not every artiste has to stand for something or have a meaning. If she wants to be vapid, offering nothing besides colourful, kid friendly images and cute bops, good for her. The consequence of course is that no one ever respects her, and she's never taken seriously, which I guess she's fine with She made hundreds of millions from her tour I think she's more than fine with it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VenusBlackStar 1,301 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Did anyone read the comments below the article?? I mean, I don't think it's as mean or childish or petty as some other people might think. It takes on an intellectual tone and is well-written 90% of the time. So cool! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VenusBlackStar 1,301 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Tbf, not every artiste has to stand for something or have a meaning. This kind of reminds me of the Victorian concept of Aestheticism (just a little). Oscar Wilde is bopping to Katy Perry jams in his grave. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adelephant 288 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Excellent article! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
display name 4,360 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Tbf, not every artiste has to stand for something or have a meaning. If she wants to be vapid, offering nothing besides colourful, kid friendly images and cute bops, good for her. The consequence of course is that no one ever respects her, and she's never taken seriously, which I guess she's fine with Totally this. She's an entertainer. Just let her be that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.