Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
science

Female-named storms kill more cause they're not taken seriously


Supersonic

Featured Posts

Supersonic

People don’t take hurricanes as seriously if they have a feminine name and the consequences are deadly, finds a new groundbreaking study.

Female-named storms have historically killed more because people neither consider them as risky nor take the same precautions, the study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences concludes.

Researchers at the University of Illinois and Arizona State University examined six decades of hurricane death rates according to gender, spanning  1950 and 2012.  Of the 47 most damaging hurricanes, the female-named hurricanes produced an average of 45 deaths compared to 23 deaths in male-named storms, or almost double the number of fatalities.  (The study excluded Katrina and Audrey, outlier storms that would skew the model).

The difference in death rates between genders was even more pronounced when comparing strongly masculine names versus strongly feminine ones.

READ MORE: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2014/06/02/female-named-hurricanes-kill-more-than-male-because-people-dont-respect-them-study-finds/?postshare=641443878353858

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

Even when they took out Katrina and Audrey, the most damaging hurricanes of all time in the USA, female-named storms were TWICE as deadly. :air:

Link to post
Share on other sites

JustPokeHerFace

:fail: Do people not understand that a hurricane doesn't actually have a gender, and that a category 5 will cause major destruction regardless of the name its assigned? I guess they don't judging by these statistics :smh: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

spanning  1950 and 2012.

I heard this a few years ago and also the response - that they only started giving storms male names a few decades ago, so it likely just shows more deaths in the 50's-70's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

b---hes be crazy

I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

No way, I can't believe people can be that stupid. At least I really hope not :smh: 

There has to be some kind of other causation going on to produce this result? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesse Pinkman

Maybe they should say the hurricane is about to start its period. I bet people would take it seriously then.

I'm so tired guys. I need a nap.

It's science, bitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dorothy Gale

When I read the title, I thought it meant females named Storm are prone to killing. :deadbanana: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Warholian

You do notice that probably the mass majority of hurricane names are going to be female? That's just totally common for almost anything other than people. 

Kevin Parker, Mac Demarco, Mark Ronson, and a stoned Lady Gaga. Need I say more?
Link to post
Share on other sites

DogFood

Let's name them all female and wipe the misogynists out

Name one Hurricane Homo and watch the homophobes run for the hills. 

MEGHAN TRAINOR | Katy Perry | Taylor Swift | Lady Gaga | Rihanna | Ariana Grande | Beyoncé | Nicki Minaj | Sam Smith
Link to post
Share on other sites

AJH219

spanning  1950 and 2012.

I heard this a few years ago and also the response - that they only started giving storms male names a few decades ago, so it likely just shows more deaths in the 50's-70's.

Exactly, while this was an interesting study, most reputable meteorologists simply dismissed it for the reason you gave above. 

'All our dreams can come true IF we have the courage to pursue them'-Walt Disney
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...