UDO 35 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 NO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Bromance 5,809 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 Wasn't there a scene in the last movie where it was confirmed he was bis-xual? Here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OfpsKemIWI "What makes you think it's my first time?" - in regards to hooking up with a guy Thanks for posting!! This is a super hot scene. I don't care what you think about unless it is about me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 102,208 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 Please This is all so overboard right now tbh. (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ 𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚠 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚒-𝚒-𝚒-𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝...! (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pop 4,541 Posted September 8, 2015 Author Share Posted September 8, 2015 Please This is all so overboard right now tbh. huehue gender equality is so over the top! The Taylor Brigade: KNOCKOUT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaga Monster 13,001 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 If it's done good then yes GGD Presidential Elections Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
venusian 4,686 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 Time for Caitlyn Jenner her filmography debut. really? WELCOME TO THE TRAGIC KINGDOM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 102,208 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 huehue gender equality is so over the top! Really, not everything need to be fixed.James Bond was created as a straight guy & spy who is a womanizer.And we should leave it at that.He is not created black, or bis-xual, or an androgynous woman.So why pushing the character to be someone else just for the sake of gender or racial equality?That is more offensive than anything tbh.Oh you are black, oh you are a woman, let's make you into a lead of this famous character that people knowbecause we fight for your equality.That is like, "Oh hey let's make Hermione a femme gay man cos equality hurr hurr!" I would be more satisfied if there is an original spy character that is created specifically as a woman,or gay or Asian or black and being and icon on its own right. (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ 𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚠 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚒-𝚒-𝚒-𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝...! (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellspont 1,468 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 No because they would just be changing the part to female just for sake of the character being female. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altair 1,999 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 maybe a partner who gets her own movie. but no, a female should not play james bond. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGD 11,799 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 The name is Bond. Jamie Bond. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elijahfan 24,529 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 Really...... Bond is Bond, if people want Bond to be black or Bond to be a woman or whatever, just do another character.I know that a lot of people want Idris Elba to be the next one, an idea that I'm not a big fan of. I know that it's an unpopular opinion, but Bond is a white British man and that's the way he was written. Would you imagine a white guy playing the part of a character that was written as a black character? The uproar that would cause. I don't know, the idea would just seem like a bad publicity stunt, and it wouldn't serve any purpose in the story. And I'm not here for minorities to be instrumentalized like that, just for the sake of it. Let's create a new, meaningful black spy character in which Elba would be able to kick ass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 101,776 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 Why do women have to be reduced to spin offs? Wouldn't it be better if they led their own franchises/legacies instead of being a "version" of something traditionally male?It would be better of course, but the topic is talking about James Bond and unfortunately it's impossible to do a female James Bond.. it's just won't be James Bond anymore but a different movie, so only a spin off can bring a female agent.. I'm working late, cause I'm a puta Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaperIz 7,282 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 No because its James Bond. Like with Doctor Who it could be done, but not with James Bond. It really doesn't make much sense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow 6,165 Posted September 8, 2015 Share Posted September 8, 2015 Salt was exceptionally great as a spy movie and Angelina Jolie was the central figure and I'd think she, Charlize Theron, Zoe Saldana, and/or Scarlett Johansson would be prime candidates for a big spy franchise like Bond. But I don't want just a female Bond, I'd prefer an original storyline and series to make it stand out and not be just a knock off of past work. I think a film about Black Widow starring Scarlett Johanssen would be great, like a closer look into her background and how she became an Avenger. Of course, I'd still be here for something completely new and fresh. 🖤 𖤓 ♠︎ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pop 4,541 Posted September 8, 2015 Author Share Posted September 8, 2015 Really, not everything need to be fixed. James Bond was created as a straight guy & spy who is a womanizer. And we should leave it at that. He is not created black, or bis-xual, or an androgynous woman. So why pushing the character to be someone else just for the sake of gender or racial equality? That is more offensive than anything tbh. Oh you are black, oh you are a woman, let's make you into a lead of this famous character that people know because we fight for your equality. That is like, "Oh hey let's make Hermione a femme gay man cos equality hurr hurr!" I would be more satisfied if there is an original spy character that is created specifically as a woman, or gay or Asian or black and being and icon on its own right. This isn't even about that. It's about pushing the boundaries of acting. Why couldn't a woman play a straight man who is a womanizer? Acting is an act of transformation and if the actress is up to the task, why not? Throughout history (since old Greece) we've had actors playing characters outside their gender role. The Taylor Brigade: KNOCKOUT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.