Why are we calling LG6 by LG5

[Yanko 9,860]

and yes i do count c2c in her discography and i actually like it but i dont count it as her solo work because its not her solo work 

lg5 it is for me 

[HausOfNena 1,712]

can we stop this already

When LG6 stans stop being delusional and accept reality (LG5), yes. 

[Paper Gangsta 6,693]

Mess @ B side.  

bu-bu-but... it's a side project isn't it? :( What kinda side projects gets music videos, singles and TV performances? 

studio videos*

A Very Gaga Holiday also had TV performance   yay it's LG7

 

I do count CTC as album but not as LG solo work. If she did solo jazz album full of orginal tracks I would consider it LG5. But now I consider it TBLG1

 

[mister max 18,480]

When LG6 stans stop being delusional and accept reality (LG5), yes. 

[Didymus 34,379]

I'm finally getting what the LG5 people are raving about and apparently it all hinges on the fact that the songs aren't original. I guess that makes sense, but the LG6 people have a point too that doesn't hinge on the originality of her songs. So in my modest opinion, the two ways of counting could perfectly co-exist in their different ways of thinking.

[Tropico 4,145]

pretentius ****s have been trying way to hard lately

everyone here is a popfan

and this drag is probably the most cringe-worthy thing i have even seen here

YOU are a pop fan yourself, do you feel superior calling people" pop fans" as if pop fans are below you?  

fix your obnoxious attitude please

C2C is not her solo work it's not her main project its her  project with tony 

L-G-5 for me 

At what point did I say I wasn't a pop fan? The reach. I also never said it was a drag nor did I make it an insult. If you think pop fans is an insult, that's on you.  You can keep ttrying to deny that CTC is a main project. Stay in denial. Not my problem.  

Exactly, C2C aka TB+LG1 is a full album, NOT a side project.

The next Lady Gaga/solo album = LG5. 

Can you link me to the Lady Gaga + Tony Bennett page with their discography? Because on Wikipedia, the CTC album is on Gaga's page and Tony's page under discography. That means it is both LG5 and TB*number*. They are not a band. They don't get a TBLG page.  

[Tropico 4,145]

studio videos*

A Very Gaga Holiday also had TV performance   yay it's LG7

 

I do count CTC as album but not as LG solo work. If she did solo jazz album full of orginal tracks I would consider it LG5. But now I consider it TBLG1

 

Not even gonna bother typing out a new reply because this has already been said. 

"Can you link me to the Lady Gaga + Tony Bennett page with their discography? Because on Wikipedia, the CTC album is on Gaga's page and Tony's page under discography. That means it is both LG5 and TB*number*. They are not a band. They don't get a TBLG page."

[Tropico 4,145]

I'm done with this arguement. Y'all can keep being in denial about CTC but it happened and is under Gaga's discography as one of her albums. There is no Tony Bennett + Lady Gaga band page where Cheek To Cheek counts as their debut. 

[Yanko 9,860]

 

At what point did I say I wasn't a pop fan? The reach. I also never said it was a drag nor did I make it an insult. If you think pop fans is an insult, that's on you.  You can keep ttrying to deny that CTC is a main project. Stay in denial. Not my problem.  

 

u said pop fans like its an insult

THE BACKTRACK  

[teenagechrist 2,853]

It's BARCODE.

Really, stop fighting over this, it's irrelevant and it's not worth it.

[Didymus 34,379]

Anyhow, I know I already pleaded for co-existence of LG4/5/6 but maybe we can all resolve this using the same question that resolved the LG4/LG5 messes:

What would Gaga think?

#LG6

[Head Empty 25,163]

I can't wait till we have the actual album title so that this discussion can stop (untill the discussion for the next album will start) .

This discussion will keep going for every album from now on, unless Gaga herself calls it "my 5th album" or something like that .

 

[Paper Gangsta 6,693]

Not even gonna bother typing out a new reply because this has already been said. 

"Can you link me to the Lady Gaga + Tony Bennett page with their discography? Because on Wikipedia, the CTC album is on Gaga's page and Tony's page under discography. That means it is both LG5 and TB*number*. They are not a band. They don't get a TBLG page."

if we are using Wiki as source then TFM is EP so it's still LG5

I do consider CTC as Gaga album but I just can't group it in LGX. When I refer to LGX it refers to her full solo works. Next one will be her sixth overall album but fifthw solo. CTC is just too different to be sorted in to same era count as rest of albums. Hence why imo next orginal album will be LG5 and next album with Tony TBLG2. Its how I see things. It's not like "LGX" has any definiton. Everyone has their own interpretation

[VforVendetta 2,024]

It's LG5 how hard is it to realize that C2C is NOT original/solo work and TFM got a ****ING GRAMMY for best pop album + a AOTY nod.....

This. Close the thread already.  

[HausOfNena 1,712]

 

Can you link me to the Lady Gaga + Tony Bennett page with their discography? Because on Wikipedia, the CTC album is on Gaga's page and Tony's page under discography. That means it is both LG5 and TB*number*. They are not a band. They don't get a TBLG page.  

C2C is Gaga's 5th official album, the next one = her 6th official album.

I do agree with you on that.  

BUT C2C is not her 5th official solo album because it's a duets album.  

LG stands for Lady Gaga, what's the point of calling C2C LG5 if it's a TB+LG duets album? 

C2C aka TB+LG1 is under Gaga's discography as one of her albums because it IS one of her albums, indeed. That's why we call it TB+LG1.

Oh, and don't trust Wikipedia. Anyone can edit it...