Gaga's constant use of nudity and small children

[Serendipity 7,821]

By small children, I mean 3-6 year olds

These days the constant nudity everywhere seems to be exposed even to little children

I don't mind with teenagers as they will do what you tell them not to do

But what about 3-6 year olds

Is it right to expose them to vulgar language and nudity at such a little age?

 

Do you think there can be a solution to this problem

I find it very disturbing-the s-xualization of the minds of small children

 

Gaga tends to use nudity as one of her instruments and is one of the most noted for s-x appeal

Even little children compose her fanbase

So is it safe to their minds?

 

Thoughts, guys?

[Giorno Giovanna 3,178]

I've seen naked people in my.sister's teenager magazines when i was 3-4, and I'm perfectly fine

 

[Miky 9,520]

 

[Sia Daily 2,045]

right

[sarahb 16,632]

What? She's not and never has been a performer for children 

[itsdominik 16,745]

I don't think nudity in pop culture is a problem for small children.

Most of 3-6 years olds have seen their parents naked several times so where is the difference? That's just my opinion.

 

 

[Bio 23,538]

That's a job for the parents, not Gaga

[Better Day 5,766]

Why are we discussing Gaga? We should be discussing Katy

[Dorothy Gale 7,575]

She's not aimed at children. If parents take their kids to her concerts they should be prepared for foul language and mature themes. Gaga has always been marketed to older teens and young adults. Well the elderly in the C2C era.  

[mariomania1234 11,368]

Kids aren't really her target demographic.

[Lassex 1,169]

I don't find nudity offensive - I think the d--g/alcohol themes might be more harmful. But really, why is nudity such a big deal? Obviously there's unnecessary s-xuality in the music scene, but it's not the same thing as a naked body.

[ShockPop 7,747]

guess what.... Everyone is naked under their clothes.

[Serendipity 7,821]

I don't find nudity offensive - I think the d--g/alcohol themes might be more harmful. But really, why is nudity such a big deal? Obviously there's unnecessary s-xuality in the music scene, but it's not the same thing as a naked body.

​Sometimes nudity is not offensive, but only actions

You can be fully dressed yet it may be considered more s-xual than a naked person

[Lady Palutena 3,147]

You and these threads

[doveve 526]

Nudity in itself is not s-xual or vulgar at all. It's a normal thing. We all have bodies and we all are naked in many occasions.

Speaking about small children, they initially don't view naked body as s-xual. Every toddler loves being naked, because they feel comfortable and free, while clothes restict their movements. Wrong environment, wrong images and wrong language may change their perspective though although they don't fully comprehend it because they don't feel s-xual desire. 

Gaga has nothing to do with children and their development. She doesn't perform or write songs to toddlers.