HarryTheNight 35 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 i hope not. it seems silly and overpriced and im mad taylor did it tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yves 1,891 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 I hope she doesn't. Her sales are struggling. (Mess. I voted yes) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koreku 2,387 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 Espensive ass streaming service. of course taylor joined it, she actually gets profit. You don't deserve a point of view if the only thing you see is you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagzus 15,829 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 i find it funny how all these people who're joining have proved in the past that money & attention is more important than music & showmanship to them. She won't join bc she loves her craft & unlike a lot of the artists supporting this; Madonna, Nicki, Rihanna etc she's not thirsty for money nor does money take priority unlike these singers.If she joined i'd be very disappointed in how hypocritical it'd be + all the people supporting it are friends with Jay-Z or are on his label so if she does... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 109,261 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 i find it funny how all these people who're joining have proved in the past that money & attention is more important than music & showmanship to them. She won't join bc she loves her craft & unlike a lot of the artists supporting this; Madonna, Nicki, Rihanna etc she's not thirsty for money nor does money take priority unlike these singers.If she joined i'd be very disappointed in how hypocritical it'd be + all the people supporting it are friends with Jay-Z or are on his label so if she does...Huh?What about Coldplay? Daft Punk? Arcade Fire? and many more that also in this?These artists only promoting new streaming service.Isn't it good to have a choice? (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢, 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯'𝘵 (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayla 7,595 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 It often seems like she doesn't do much with that stuff. Of all the things Gaga could put on her page, why would she #TurnItBlue to promote a streaming service? I could see her switching to the service, but ultimately I don't see her caring enough to make a big deal out of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreyw 4,285 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 "track Applause from the album Applause" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrinceGaga 7,585 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 "track Applause from the album Applause" That's the single Applause so it's in it's own album with it's own artwork. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Witch 1,626 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 She wouldn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miley Ray Cyrus 26 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 She won't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1986 629 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 who are we to say she shouldn't? we're not the ones who are a big star who wants money coming on 24/7. she could have joined long ago & we never know! it's her & her labels decison BUY BEAUTY BEHIND THE MADNESS ON ITUNES. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmm 979 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 I think that in an interview not long ago she slammed the streaming services so I doubt it.Idk of the interview or words you're referring to but if she slammed the streaming services; wouldn't she be in more support of tidal; as it's 100% paid version? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yanko 9,860 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 Its been 2 years and some of you still don't get it ... "Music not the bling" doesn't mean she hates money and wants nothing to do with it and that if she accepted money or made any money she's hypocrite of the year. . by "music not the bling" she meant that she writes music to express her feelings and spread a message and because she loves music and she doesn't write music so that she can top the charts. Of course it'd be a nice bonus if she tops the charts but that isn't a her primary reason to write music. She'd only be a hypocrite if she wrote music with the primary intention to sell millions of copies. So by her joining this Tidal streaming service, she isn't a hypocrite. She's just a business woman. On Topic: I hope not. Spotify still gives her money and isn't as expensive. But I wouldn't fault her too much if she decided to. Business is business and her label probably has the greater say in whether or not she joins. :shryg: music not the bling means she wants her music to be heard and the money is not the most important thing at least that's what i get from that sentence but no one will ever know what gaga really meant so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,379 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 If she does she'll focus on the lossless music thing and maybe repeat a bit of the contradictory simultaneously pro/con corporate businesses of her SXSW interview. The money argument obviously won't come up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellatrix 34,775 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 who are we to say she shouldn't? we're not the ones who are a big star who wants money coming on 24/7. she could have joined long ago & we never know! it's her & her labels decison This tbh.Believe it or not, but we are not her little managers. I'm sure Gaga and her team will choose the best path for her Lose control. Let go and fall. Do you get the satisfaction? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.e89514d11296cf46907bd58fe862627c.gif)
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.