lowkeyz 1 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Gun in my purse b---h I came dressed to kill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melech 9,900 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Guns are legal in Switzerland and the numbers are the lowest like in the whole world Because Switzerland has a totally different mentality than usa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus 54 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 That must feel horrible for the child. Imagine growing up knowing that you accidentally killed your mother. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowkeyz 1 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Because Switzerland has a totally different mentality than usa. That's a different thing. Switzerland gives guns only for those who are adult, not mentally ill, had no problems with law and passed a test. And that's a good idea Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 What if a guy carried a gun and tried to shoot someone in the store.. and she had the gun to defend everyone in the store? you know that these shooting that happened in theaters? the shooter always chooses theaters that dont allow guns so nobody can defend themselfs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SychosSoChic 9,995 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 The ONLY thing stopping any of you from doing the whole "omg what's wrong with the world RIP :cry:" or "Humanity is truly going downhill" thing, is the fact she had a weapon on her, which was for self-defense, and the fact her own child shot her is sad, and the fact ya'll have no sympathy for the woman purely because she had a gun is just Life ain't Hollywood for any one of us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewYorkCity 10,536 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 What if a guy carried a gun and tried to shoot someone in the store.. and she had the gun to defend everyone in the store? you know that these shooting that happened in theaters? the shooter always chooses theaters that dont allow guns so nobody can defend themselfs. what if that guy wasn't either able to get a gun so eassily? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 what if that guy wasn't either able to get a gun so eassily? ​The number of mass shootings has not increased over the past decades. The murder rate is less than half what it was two decades ago. Anyone can easily find a gun in the united states or outside.. these 300 million guns are not going to disapear. ​1/3 of legal owners get their guns privately. 44% bought the gun privately 32% stole it 9% rented or borrowed it 16% bought it from a retailer 3% mentioned the black market 600k guns stolen every year, millions circulating among criminals. -Criminal interviewed in prison say they refrained from attacking people who might be armed -Crime rates drop substantially after highly publicized instances of victims arming or defending themselves -43% of UK burglaries occured when people were home, only 9% of US burglaries. Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFMUeUErYVg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thatfoxyfeeling 13,401 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 I can't get my head around why she would carry a gun while shopping, so backwards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewYorkCity 10,536 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 ​The number of mass shootings has not increased over the past decades. The murder rate is less than half what it was two decades ago. Anyone can easily find a gun in the united states or outside.. these 300 million guns are not going to disapear. ​1/3 of legal owners get their guns privately. 44% bought the gun privately 32% stole it 9% rented or borrowed it 16% bought it from a retailer 3% mentioned the black market 600k guns stolen every year, millions circulating among criminals. -Criminal interviewed in prison say they refrained from attacking people who might be armed -Crime rates drop substantially after highly publicized instances of victims arming or defending themselves -43% of UK burglaries occured when people were home, only 9% of US burglaries. Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFMUeUErYVg I live in europe and I know how many times I have seen on the newsabout mass killing or guns incidents like this one. So that's the only thing I need to know about how efective guns are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 I live in europe and I know how many times I have seen on the newsabout mass killing or guns incidents like this one. So that's the only thing I need to know about how efective guns are. Mass Shootings: The Facts: *The number of mass shootings has not increased over the past decades *The most mass killings of US were 1929 *Mass murder incidents declined from 42 in the 1990s to 26 from 2000-2012 *The three worst K-12 school shootings took place in either Britain or Germany *The murder rate is less than half of what it was two decades ago. International Comparisons:*US vs UK - UK still had far less violence before 1920, when gun controls were the same *1919: homicide rate in UK/Wales 0.08/100k, in the US 9.5/100k (almost 12x) *1983-1986: UK 0.67, US 7.59 *After 60 years of increasing gun control, UK murder rates got worse *43% of UK burglaries occurred when people were home, only 9% of US burglaries *Boston has the strictest gun control, Also has the most school shootings *Canada has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world, almost as many rifles per capita in Canada as in the United States. Did you know that citizens use guns to protect themselves against criminals over two and a half million times a year? If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns, because the guns will be needed to disarm people. So it's not that you are anti-gun. You'll need the police's guns to take away other people's guns. So you are very pro-gun, you just believe that only the Government (which is, of course, so reliable, honest, moral and virtuous) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun control. There is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small, political elite and their minions Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
My Little Phoney 658 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 WHY WOULD SHE CARRY THE GUN TO WALMART WTF IS WRONG WITH HUMANITY Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 680 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 If only the women has a 2nd gun in a holster, so she could have quick drawn and shot the kid before it shot her her ... (parody NRA logic) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiorgiGeladze 0 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Well,thats horrible,Im merely trying to figure out how 2 years old boy managed to get the gun out of her mom's bag and shot her without her recognition..or why would she carry the gun while shopping with family... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luiz 4,253 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Mass Shootings: The Facts: *The number of mass shootings has not increased over the past decades *The most mass killings of US were 1929 *Mass murder incidents declined from 42 in the 1990s to 26 from 2000-2012 *The three worst K-12 school shootings took place in either Britain or Germany *The murder rate is less than half of what it was two decades ago. International Comparisons:*US vs UK - UK still had far less violence before 1920, when gun controls were the same *1919: homicide rate in UK/Wales 0.08/100k, in the US 9.5/100k (almost 12x) *1983-1986: UK 0.67, US 7.59 *After 60 years of increasing gun control, UK murder rates got worse *43% of UK burglaries occurred when people were home, only 9% of US burglaries *Boston has the strictest gun control, Also has the most school shootings *Canada has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world, almost as many rifles per capita in Canada as in the United States. Did you know that citizens use guns to protect themselves against criminals over two and a half million times a year? If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns, because the guns will be needed to disarm people. So it's not that you are anti-gun. You'll need the police's guns to take away other people's guns. So you are very pro-gun, you just believe that only the Government (which is, of course, so reliable, honest, moral and virtuous) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun control. There is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small, political elite and their minions source for those statistics? I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.