Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem

Republicans take over the U.S.


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Morphine Prince

I don't agree. Minority groups were alienated and others didn't turn out. And other ID laws and such upheld by the Supreme Court during an election cycle prevented still others that could have voted, from voting.

Not to mention this is a midterm, and GOP are more likely to turn out to begin with in elections especially midterms whereas more of the liberal-leaning voters don't turn out nearly as much as during presidential elections.

And don't get me started on the unlimited amount of money allowed in our political campaigns that is clearly and overtly influencing our elections. 2012 was just the beginning as the first major one with the ruling of Citizens United which is the preeminemt superPAC, and this election was even worse with all the political ads.

No telling what will happen in 2016..

Hmm... yes, fewer people vote during midterms.

But how do voter ID laws prevent people from voting? I never really understood this argument. You need an ID to drive, buy alcohol, get on welfare programs, etc. How do people not have an ID?

EDIT: I live in Texas, and as you may know they passed a Voter ID Law. Yet I remember my parents being asked for an ID way before this was passed.... so... I'm not sure about it. How many people don't have some sort of ID?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better Day

If you think it's bad, We have David Cameron as a prime minister, he is ruining and lying about our country - Devo max

Together You And I!
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think it's bad, We have David Cameron as a prime minister, he is ruining and lying about our country - Devo max

Just remember what Lincoln did to the South when it tried to separate. On that issue, Cameron is a model of liberalism in comparison.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better Day

Just remember what Lincoln did to the South when it tried to separate. On that issue, Cameron is a model of liberalism in comparison.

Cameron is defininetly worse since he lied to gain voters. David Cameron is worse that good old Maggie Witch Thatcher

Together You And I!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cameron is defininetly worse since he lied to gain voters. David Cameron is worse that good old Maggie Witch Thatcher

 

The US waged a bloody war to crush secession. Spain won't recognize results of a referendum.

Don't know if devo max will prove a lie, but Salmond was certainly being deceptive about prospects if his side won.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no more legalization of same-s-x marriage in more states for now

My Favs = Lady Gaga, Janet Jackson, Ricky Martin, AKB48
Link to post
Share on other sites

Willy Wonka

Hmm... yes, fewer people vote during midterms.

But how do voter ID laws prevent people from voting? I never really understood this argument. You need an ID to drive, buy alcohol, get on welfare programs, etc. How do people not have an ID?

EDIT: I live in Texas, and as you may know they passed a Voter ID Law. Yet I remember my parents being asked for an ID way before this was passed.... so... I'm not sure about it. How many people don't have some sort of ID?

If it were to be done constitutionally and with an appropriate roll out schedule and stream-lined and applied rationally, I don't think anyone would have that big of a problem with it.

And you're thinking about the term "ID" in a colloquial sense rather than how it actually is applied here. Almost everyone has some form of identification, but not necessarily a form of ID that will be legally accepted. Several (I mean several) states have tried to make it so that student IDs were not an accepted form of identification, while simultaneously arguing that NRA memberships cards ARE an accepted form of identification. Or they would try to make it so that your driver's license couldn't be expired if you wanted to use it as identification (which is often the case for senior citizens).

Let's take my state for example though. In my state, it's estimated that there are 300,000 eligible voters who don't have an accepted form of identification. Whether it be college students who have always relied on their student ID, senior citizens who haven't updated their ID in years, seniors citizens who were born at home (and thus don't have a birth certificate in order to get an ID), old birth certificates where the parents' msmrs aren't fully written (and are incapable of being used to receive an ID), etc.

Furthermore, unlike everything else you listed, voting is a constitutional right. There shouldn't be significant barriers. And that's not even mentioning the cost of getting an ID, which is essentially a poll tax.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was inevitable. National statistics show that Americans are fed up with Democratic control after the crazy last 6 years. Not surprised at all and I definitely won't be surprised if the next president is a Republican as well, considering the national approval polls for Obama.

 

A part of me feels that a big reason why he's been so unsuccessful is because they were so divided. It's hard to get anything done when the people working together are people who almost always disagree. :shrug:

 

However, after watching an episode of John Oliver's show, I've learned how much MORE important local legislation is. :dead: Makes me feel like I'd be better off paying more attention to local and state government elections than the big ones like this if I actually want to make a difference with my votes. 

 

Video, for reference:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIMgfBZrrZ8

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are, people tend to vote against the current president's party. Now that the republicans control both the upper and lower house, it really sucks if you're a female, homos-xual, ethnic minority or an immigrant.

this tbn

My Favs = Lady Gaga, Janet Jackson, Ricky Martin, AKB48
Link to post
Share on other sites

Prometheus

Check the definitions of "gay" and "bis-xual" You are confused. There is no such entity as a bis-xual GAY man. :sharon:

I'm not confused. I haven't figured out what to identify as. Please don't laugh at my s-xual orientation and how I choose to identify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nathantj594

I'm all for it, but her chances are slim to none...unless the Republican Party is stupid enough to nominate another Mitt Romney. :fail:  

The ball is in their court. If the GOP can come up with someone who is at least somewhat acceptable, they have this next one in the bag.

Where you getting this information from? It's not slim to none, it's actually a very good chance she will be our next president if she runs. The Pubs have no star. Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Rand Paul are too conservative, that will alienate the swing voters. Chris Christie is too liberal, that will alienate the conservative base like it did with Romney. The only ones who I think could even come close to beating her are Huckabee (But he won't run) Pataki or Bush the third (Fmr. Florida Gov.)  

And Paula Abdul ain’t got [BLEEP] on me!
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Shadow locked this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...