Jump to content

Solar To Become Worlds Cheapest Energy Source Soon!


Economy

Featured Posts

Economy

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-29/while-you-were-getting-worked-up-over-oil-prices-this-just-happened-to-solar.html

 

This technology is finally beginning to become more efficient and cost effective, soon it will be among the cheapest if not the cheapest form of energy per KW produced

 

This means it will also no longer be an economic burden to build them for the sake of saving the planet. Energy Companies will find it profitable to invest in these without subsidies and that could lead to less disputes between environmentalists, and those who worry more about economic matters

 

It makes up a relatively small portion of enery production now, but by 2050 its expected to surpass all forms of energy including coal, natural gas, oil, hydro-electricity and even nuclear!

 

iHF9w5iJW38M.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an electrical engineer, I'm not so sure about this... 

I don't believe this technology will be available before nuclear by 2050. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great!

 

Here where I live there is a company literally GIVING AWAY solar panels to residents to get the word around about them. It's obviously limited to how many is give away, but it's still good. People are finally realizing this is the way forward

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant imagine the impact this would have on our future :ghostlegend:
 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------
 

This is great!
 
Here where I live there is a company literally GIVING AWAY solar panels to residents to get the word around about them. It's obviously limited to how many is give away, but it's still good. People are finally realizing this is the way forward

 
:omg: that is amazing

Link to post
Share on other sites

JustPokeHerFace

This is great, for two reasons!

 

1. We are moving to cleaner and more abundant resources, and they are becoming cheaper too.

 

2. Also, I am doing an assignment for a class that involves collecting scientific articles, so thanks for the help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy

As an electrical engineer, I'm not so sure about this... 

I don't believe this technology will be available before nuclear by 2050. 

why? in such a short period of time its efficiency and costs have improved so much

 

why is it that unrealistic for it to in 35-40 years be a dominant form of energy?

This is great, for two reasons!

 

1. We are moving to cleaner and more abundant resources, and they are becoming cheaper too.

 

2. Also, I am doing an assignment for a class that involves collecting scientific articles, so thanks for the help!

haha np! :)

 

And as a guy that worries a lot about the economy, this is also great news... The environment affects us but so does the economy. Most people are usually only sensitive to one issue or the other but rarely both and people dont have balanced views and opposite parties just argue

 

nnow its gonna be easier to be more sustainable without destroying the economy and finances in the process :yes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy

For some reason, I find it hard to believe too. 

 

But, hey, if it works, it works. 

 

LFTR though.

well renewables are newer forms of technology than fossil fuels so they are more premative and inneficient still. But they are progressing rapidly. Wind and solar now is more cost effective and reliable than the same energy 10 years ago

 

And im proud to say my Country (well my background Nationality) Portugal has played a huge role in solar research

 

Ive always been skeptical of rushing into renewables because... well, to me the economy is a major issue also... if we transitioned into green energy as quickly as some activists push for, wed totally destroy our finances and cripple the economy in the process, its just too expensive :shrug:

 

but gradually over time as it becomes cheaper and cheaper, and more and more efficient, we can have our cake and eat it too. Economic, and green at the same time!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

why? in such a short period of time its efficiency and costs have improved so much

 

why is it that unrealistic for it to in 35-40 years be a dominant form of energy?

 

 

Because there are physical limits to efficiency and distribution using solar cells. While limits have been predicted and surpassed previously, these are not within 35 years of current technology. :P

 

I believe it is substantially more likely that there will be a development in nuclear energy.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Shadow locked this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...