Blue Jeans 3,815 Posted October 27, 2014 Author Share Posted October 27, 2014 But that is just your opinion. Not everyone is going to think like you. is not an opinion its a fact tho Destiny is for losers. It’s just a stupid excuse to wait for things to happen instead of making them happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman 4,660 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Crazy In Love. Honestly, I often forget that Bad Romance exists. Which is really weird. :Emma: It's science, bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valextra 58 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 i'm saying whats more TIMELESS. meaning, if i play this today at a club what song will get the biggest reaction ?? And again Bad Romance. In which club? In my country they don't even put Beyoncé in the disco-clubs, if this is the parameter, while 'Bad Romance' and Lady Gaga in general are evergreen now, especially in the gay ones, same for the ones that I've been in the rest of Europe, I have no memories to have ever heard Beyoncé in a gay or straight disco-club in Europe. Crazy In Love was released way earlier, and still it's the one featured in a trailer for one of 2015's most anticipated films, Fifty Shades of Grey. That's more than a decade later after its 2003 release. Plus, it's been featured more in movies, ranging from 2004 to 2012. If that alone wouldn't make it more timeless, then I don't what else would. BR's great, but it is nowhere comparable to Crazy In Love. But it's not the same version, it's re-arranged, it's a totally different song. It is nowhere to be comparable properly because they are from different ages and genres, and the popularity-impact is different from country to country. Also, Lady Gaga in general according to the internet biggest movie database has been featured musically more on tv and cinemas compared to Beyoncé considering also Destiny's Child songs, with a difference of 10 years of career basically. Receipts: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3078932/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 126 Credit Lady Gaga only from 2008 http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0461498/?ref_=nv_sr_1 124 Credits Beyoncé with Destiny's Child from 1999. To you if you want to count how many times Bad Romance compared to Crazy in Love with a difference of 6 years basically :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow 6,632 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Hmm, let us ask the farmers on the orange orchard which fruit tastes the best, apples or oranges. Bad Romance and Crazy In Love are great pop masterpieces in their own rite. All this subjective thought sort of falls short of the idea of a "timeless" piece since we are not two or three generations from these songs to judge in retrospect against the mosaic of other music hits during the 2000s and/or 2010s. Do your own research. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambrosia 3,775 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Just ask what I like better, Game of Thrones or Lord of the Rings movies. I can't go for that. Nope. Do not do to others what angers you if done to you by others. -Socrates Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LilVenusian 579 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Crazy in Love's impact and legacy trumps Bad Romance by a long shot. Lol at some of the delusion in this post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kermit the frog 1,921 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Why is that even a question? Crazy in love maybe has a chance of being "iconic" in the USA, but it was nowhere near bad romance in mainland Europe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
monsterdreams 1,529 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Crazy in Love but obviously I prefer bad romance Haters gonna need more than a flashlight for my shade Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LilVenusian 579 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Why is that even a question? Crazy in love maybe has a chance of being "iconic" in the USA, but it was nowhere near bad romance in mainland Europe. Being iconic/well known in the US>>>Europe. Lets be real here hunty... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
User 352 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Crazy in Love's impact and legacy trumps Bad Romance by a long shot. Lol at some of the delusion in this post. Never. Crazy in Love sounds more timeless , because it has new and oldstyle elements which complement each other perfectly. But Bad Romance was much more iconic, had much more impact at the whole music industry. Crazy in Love was in Europe not nearly so big like Bad Romance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LilVenusian 579 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Never. Crazy in Love sounds more timeless , because it has new and oldstyle elements which complement each other perfectly. But Bad Romance was much more iconic, had much more impact at the whole music industry. Crazy in Love was in Europe not nearly so big like Bad Romance. Im talking about the impact and legacy of the song. Check any list for the best songs of the 00's and Crazy In Love will likely be in the top 10, whereas Bad Romance (the song) is rarely mentioned. Just because Bad Romance had a cool video dosen't mean people will checking for/praising the song 20+years from now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wet Fire 7,511 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Bad Romance is more iconic, popular and remembered. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.