Jump to content

Cheek to Cheek review database + Metacritic thread


MonsterMum

Featured Posts

Los Angelas Times just wrote a scathing review for Cheek 2 Cheek. 1 outta 4 stars. I can't even believe some of the stuff this asshole said in it.

It will be added anytime now :madge:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Bad Monster Kid

Here is the Twitter handle for the reviewer from Los Angeles Times. Everyone, please feel free to drag this b---h.

@mikaelwood

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rollercoaster

Los Angeles Times just wrote a scathing review for Cheek 2 Cheek. 1 outta 4 stars. I can't even believe some of the stuff this asshole said in it.

Is it a critic that has an ounce of merit? Doubtful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MonsterMum

Los Angeles Times just wrote a scathing review for Cheek 2 Cheek. 1 outta 4 stars. I can't even believe some of the stuff this asshole said in it.

 

"Staff writer covering pop music at the Los Angeles Times"

 

Would you judge a jazz album if you not a jazz artist yourself? :fan:

Link to post
Share on other sites

consequence of sound gave it 73/100 (it counts for metacritic)

 

So of course, metacritic put it as 58/100 and lowered it to 70. Metacritic's a joke. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So of course, metacritic put it as 58/100 and lowered it to 70. Metacritic's a joke. 

IDGI how is that possible? how does 58 = 73??? :duck:

 

edit: here http://www.metacritic.com/about-metascores C+ equals 58 so they didn't pull it out of their ass. 

still stupid though they keep adding the mixed reviews when there are tons of positive ones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MonsterMum

IDGI how is that possible? how does 58 = 73??? :duck:

 

edit: here http://www.metacritic.com/about-metascores C+ equals 58 so they didn't pull it out of their ass. 

still stupid though they keep adding the mixed reviews when there are tons of positive ones.

 

I don't get why they gave it a C+ tho looking at the only positive review. It felt like a B looking at what they wrote.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GypsyPrince

this is a losing battle let's be real. The staff behind Metacritic are clearly NOT here for Gaga so even if she releases a flawless and timeless album with 9 : 1 good reviews against bad ones, they'll still perch for the BAD ones first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Teal Ambition

Its down to 70 now because Telegraph UK gave it a 60.

▌│█║▌║▌║ before I am Canadian, I am Chromatican ║▌║▌║█│▌
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ray of Light

It's really odd. Most of the negative/mixed reviews are extremely positive and have gratifying wordage; it's just the score that is really far-fetched from what they just said. 

 

"Gaga captivates us; and escapes pop music in a delightful journey to jazz" - Gives it a 60 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Admin unpinned this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...