JaggedMonster 2 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 I don't know exactly but two of my twitter friends said how they got quite a shady replies, like you could tell that they were laughing at us. who the **** is working for them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellspont 1,468 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 lmao of course they added the 1 star review and not the 12 4 star reviews that came out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emvee 8,363 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Like, is there any way to stop the LA Times from contributing their review for Lady Gaga albums? We all know how they feel about HER. So, let's get some publications that actually review her MUSIC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylangaga 216 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 SCREAMINGGGGGGG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay.P 2,336 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Hmm Do you hear that? It's poison. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman 4,660 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Tragic :rip: It's science, bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hauser 1,262 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Gaga was right when she said ARTPOP would live on forever :madge: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GagaMyBlood95 9,915 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Ugh now I'm just pressed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omegahedron 189 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 They actually counted that rag from LA?!?! What a piece of bull crap! Why do they count the papers with an axe to grind?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady 748 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Ok but my ACTUAL guestion is that why is Metacritic so important? I know you should like get the general opinion of an album from there but isn't that pretty much it? What does it count for? It's not like the gp knows what MC is or something like that. So, why is it so important (I also love to see the score high but still, this is funnily important only for us, fans, I think, or am I wrong?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slayer 9,227 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 I'm actually outraged that that LAtimes review was included. Such negative, biased "journalism". Sorry, I can't take Metacritic seriously anymore. I love judas SO MUCH but I canʹt look like a copycat of JLO!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necca 166 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 https://twitter.com/mikaelwood this is the person responsible for that LA times review you know what to do Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry 2,374 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 https://twitter.com/mikaelwood this is the person responsible for that LA times review you know what to do https://twitter.com/HenryM0nster/status/515645734117314560 Already did I went abit easy on him tho Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klou 2,414 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 PLEASE don't email Metacritic. That will just make things worse. Watch then only add the negative reviews for Gaga's next album :awkney: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaGaubin 0 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 25 ? Seriously LA Times ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.