Jump to content

Cheek to Cheek review database + Metacritic thread


MonsterMum

Featured Posts

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Rollercoaster

Irrelevant site cant possibly accurately represent the opinions of anything because they have no basis on which to accept/ignore reviews. It's just a completely random number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blue Jeans

Gaga was right when she said ARTPOP would live on forever :legend:

 

c9DwKCe.gif

Destiny is for losers. It’s just a stupid excuse to wait for things to happen instead of making them happen
Link to post
Share on other sites

Miracle

she's still coming for those GRAMMYs tho

 

tabloids try to ruin Gaga's career but they won't get it

 

Getting jazz to Billboard top 3, having two top #1 jazz hits, the jazz chanteuse is slaying

Link to post
Share on other sites

Redstreak

What the actual ****? Aren't they supposed to consider only 4 reviews? 

No, it takes 4 reviews before they can publish an overall number. They consider as many reviews as they get sent.

Take a moment to think of just flexibility, love, and trust~
Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew metacritic would jump on this one negative review when there are dozens of 80's out there that haven't been counted yet.

They're picking all of the random negative reviews. Any and all of them have been counted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Admin unpinned this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...