Nitsua 27 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 poor tony. this must be his lowest scoring albulm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanceInTheFlames 154 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 "Shallow, deeply unimaginative"? Hmmm.... sounds a lot like LA. Projecting much? No one should share this article or bring attention to it. That's exactly what the writer and the publication wants. Let them be assholes, the media is full of ****. Never believe a thing you hear from the media. Always think for yourself and always ask questions. The only goal (MOST) media has today is to get big reactions like this out of everyone in order to retain relevance. Most of the media is wiling to throw accuracy and honesty out the window in exchange for attention and views. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick1495 991 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 All because she says she hates California because it's cold and it's damp...:derpga: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jeans 3,815 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 poor tony. this must be his lowest scoring albulm This.. Destiny is for losers. It’s just a stupid excuse to wait for things to happen instead of making them happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allison M 357 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 poor tony. this must be his lowest scoring albulm And just because people have something against Gaga for whatever reason. It's so stupid. It's like freaking high school bullshÃt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mariomania1234 11,368 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 It'll be fine. These numbers mean very little in the grand scheme of things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharamon 6,839 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Katy Rats wrote it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
somnambulist 1,526 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 It's not so much the score that bothers me in that LA Times review (although 25 percent is laughably bad for such a great album), it's that the review doesn't even MENTION tony. The review literally spends the whole time on gaga, what expectations they have of her, and how much of a "flop" she is, and not ONCE do they mention Tony's voice or his contribution at all. It's extremely biased and one sided. Really lame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEANBO 364 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 What? LA Times better run. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allison M 357 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 It's not so much the score that bothers me in that LA Times review (although 25 percent is laughably bad for such a great album), it's that the review doesn't even MENTION tony. The review literally spends the whole time on gaga, what expectations they have of her, and how much of a "flop" she is, and not ONCE do they mention Tony's voice or his contribution at all. It's extremely biased and one sided. Really lame. This. They seem to forget that this was a collaborative album. The have it the score based on their opinions of Gaga rather than album. They didn't even care if it affected Tony. He was half of the album and not even mentioned. I love though that Tony probably doesn't mind because he understands Gaga's position. He knew this would be biased. He knew Gaga's name would influence people to poorly review it. But he's knows the truth and so does Gaga. These reviews probably don't bother them because it's not honest. They know this person probably just had it out for Gaga. Oh well. Their loss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pure Adrenaline 1,518 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 and there goes the so awaited critical acclaim :madge: It's much more fun to have hizophrenia... u never get lonely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitter 3,640 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 WE ARE ABOUT TO HAVE ANOTHER #1 ALBUM, SCREW THE CRITICS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoneyBaby 17 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 umm... i don't get one thing. how come do they call this piece of **** 'a review' if out of 7 paragraphs only 1 of them is barely 'reviewing' the actual album? whole 'review' is about gaga, ARTPOP, swine at sxsw and gaga once again. was it written by 70 year old madonna fan or wtf did i just read? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Look at these comments tho: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/la-et-ms-review-lady-gaga-tony-bennett-bad-dream-team-cheek-to-cheek-20140926-story.html#panel=comments Surely Metacritic should take comments like these into account and maybe realise that the review is too biased to count? Otherwise what is the point of Metacritic if it doesn't review the music, but rather the opinion of the critics' opinions on the person. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CookieHWilson 685 Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Irrelevant site cant possibly accurately represent the opinions of anything because they have no basis on which to accept/ignore reviews. It's just a completely random number. This this this. nonsequitur Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.