War Machine pounded a p0rnstar.

[Diamond Heart 4,400]

What is wrong with you? Can you read? I said I feel no sympathy for cheaters (justifiably) but that does not mean I condone his actions. In fact, I stated his punishment was too severe. However that still does not change the fact that I have no room in my heart to feel any form of sympathy towards these kinds of people. Don't want to get beat up by your boyfriend? Then don't cheat. Simple.

 

Having that said apparently he was her ex in which case he was the "bad guy" to use your terms.

Jesus wtf is wrong with you ? 

Cheating is terrible, but in no circumstances does it warrant  beating or rape. If you think its ok for a guy to beat the **** outta a girl for cheating your ****ed up man 

[lucia4 0]

Jesus wtf is wrong with you ? 

Cheating is terrible, but in no circumstances does it warrant  beating or rape. If you think its ok for a guy to beat the **** outta a girl for cheating your ****ed up man 

 

That is exactly the opposite of my point. Please do read my longer response right above your post before conveniently quoting a part of my reply and twisting my words around.

 

Jesus, people here need to learn reading comprehension.

[Diamond Heart 4,400]

That is exactly the opposite of my point. Please do read my longer response right above your post before conveniently quoting a part of my reply and twisting my words around.

 

Jesus, people here need to learn how to read properly.

Except its not. You can dance around your point all you want but 'I'm saying she was a moron for cheating in the first place and should've expected the repercussions that she received' is complete bull****. As someone who has been on the receiving end of a beating by an ex, i find this extremely offensive. She shouldnt have expected anything like what happened to her, she didnt even cheat on him, they werent together. It doesnt matter if he was a psychopath with violent tendencies, no woman or man should ever receive 'repercussions' like this.

[lucia4 0]

Except its not. You can dance around your point all you want but 'I'm saying she was a moron for cheating in the first place and should've expected the repercussions that she received' is complete bull****. As someone who has been on the receiving end of a beating by an ex, i find this extremely offensive. She shouldnt have expected anything like what happened to her, she didnt even cheat on him, they werent together. It doesnt matter if he was a psychopath with violent tendencies, no woman or man should ever receive 'repercussions' like this.

 

And again you prove that you haven't read my posts properly. I said that it doesn't matter because SHE DIDN'T CHEAT. It's purely hypothetical. They were apparently not together so she did not provoke being beat up in any way.

 

If she was cheating (which she wasn't, but let's pretend she did) then my point of 'I'm saying she was a moron for cheating in the first place and should've expected the repercussions that she received' is absolutely true and your shallow perception of the situation because of your personal experience cannot comprehend that. It is an entirely different thing to say that someone "deserves to be beat up and raped" and "she should've expected being beat up and raped by her psycho boyfriend when she committed adultery on him" (which again, doesn't even apply to the situation). That's not "dancing around a point", because I stand by what I say and am not afraid to speak my mind instead of hopping on the bandwagon. If you cannot understand that you need to go back to school.

[Diamond Heart 4,400]

And again you prove that you haven't read my posts properly. I said that it doesn't matter because SHE DIDN'T CHEAT. It's purely hypothetical. They were apparently not together so she did not provoke being beat up in any way.

 

If she was cheating (which she wasn't, but let's pretend she did) then my point of 'I'm saying she was a moron for cheating in the first place and should've expected the repercussions that she received' is absolutely true and your shallow perception of the situation because of your personal experience cannot comprehend that.

'If she was cheating (which she wasn't, but let's pretend she did) then my point of 'I'm saying she was a moron for cheating in the first place and should've expected the repercussions that she received' is absolutely true' Which is still a load of absolute bull****. IT DOESNT MATTER IF SHE WAS CHEATING ANYWAY.Jesus. No one should expect the repercussions like this. Everyone has personal choices in life and HIS was to do something absolutely disgusting to another human being, and your trying to justify why. Imma stop now though because obviously as a victim of abuse i just have a shallow and clouded perception of it  :roll:

[Bebe 17,289]

First of all, my reply deserved to be condescending because his/her reply was offensive when my original post wasn't. If you do not show courtesy to me, do not expect it back.

 

Secondly, my rape a--lysis was an example of how I do NOT feel. Did you get that? Also, I did not say you deserve to be beat up when you cheat. Do not twist my words around. I said if you don't want to risk getting beat up by your psycho boyfriend, then don't cheat. That's an entirely different point of view. You're claiming I believe that people who cheat should be beat up, I'm saying she was a moron for cheating in the first place and should've expected the repercussions that she received. And above that adultery is a psychological crime in itself and her getting beat up does not suddenly make her innocent and THE victim. If she hadn't been beaten up and instead he would've committed suicide, you wouldn't have so much sympathy for her, now would you? (If you do that's just sad.)

 

Not cheating is a simple judgement call and my bear-metaphor stands. If you don't want to risk the consequences, then don't do it. It's an easy logic some people here cannot seem to comprehend. Keep your *** in your pants, it's not that hard. And especially don't take your *****ish *** out in the house to which your psycho boyfriend has the keys. If you're going to commit adultery at least have the common sense to go to a motel or hotel. But then again, considering she cheated in the first place (she didn't, but apparently we're talking like she did) she lacks intelligence.

 

Thirdly, you are the one with a black and white view of the world. I love how you're trying to use my own phrases against me and completely fail at doing so. A black and white view of the situation is saying "aww, the woman got beat up so she MUST be the victim". Really? No. Not really. Both parties were to blame. Your so-called sympathy towards people who are cheated on is irrelevant and does not help prove your shallow case. You're only 20 years old (as expected, which I just saw confirmed in your profile). I've been on both sides of the coin and there's absolutely no reason to feel sympathy towards a woman you read about on the internet and whom you've never met who committed a sin.

 

Lastly, what are you even talking about? The woman apparently DID NOT CHEAT. I stated that in my SECOND post in this topic. There is absolutely no point to this discussion which you and "MJHolland" seem eager to continue. But by all means, feel free to try and reply to this post again. I stand by my point.

God. You are completely dancing around this issue, it's not only frustrating to deal with but it's disturbing that you have such a horrible mentality.

Yes I understand that you don't think women should be raped because of what they wear

Way to miss the point buddy, how about you go and read my comment back. You are saying that you are not the same as those victim blamers when you really are. There is nothing that she could have done that would justify him beating her, and you are justifying his actions by claiming you don't feel sympathy for her because she cheated.

For what it's worth, from the very first time I read this story I knew she wasn't cheating on him. Even if the first time you read about it was here, the very first sentence of the article posted here mentioned that Christy Mack was his ex-girlfriend. I keep replying to you because, regardless of this case, the fact that your first instinct would be to defend the person who beat up and tried to rape a woman accused of cheating is disturbing. I mean what do you expect when you date a p0rn star right?? What a b---h!! ( :millie:  :millie:  :millie: )

 

You should really look up the meaning of psychological projection, because  you tell multiple people here that their reading comprehension is off and that they have such shallow perceptions of the situation while you continue to dance around their points and act like a complete nethanderal. 

 

In a hypothetical situation where she cheated, you are saying that she should have expected that he break 18 bones in her body, attempt to rape her and force her to strip naked and shower while he berates her. In fact, although you think this "punishment" would be harsh, it's clearly to be expected because the b---h committed a "psychological crime" by having s-x with another man.

 

I mean really? 

 

"I'm saying she was a moron for cheating in the first place and should've expected the repercussions that she received."

Yeah and that's kinda ****ed up right? What kind of animal is going to resort to domestic abuse and violence to deal with relationship problems, including infidelity? A woman should't expect to be beaten and raped under any circumstance. Can you comprehend this simple point? What he did is FAAAAR worse than anything she could have done by sleeping with another person. She was afraid for her life. He beat her in such a horrific manner, tried to rape her and humiliated/intimidated her by stripping her naked and forcing her to shower.

The fact that you would think of her abuse as some form of "punishment" or as a "repercussion" for cheating is truly disturbing because the act of this domestic abuse is so unexcusable and unjustifiable. 

 

If this War Machine guy cheated on her, do you think she would have some sort of excuse to threaten him with a knife? Maybe she could get some other guy to beat him up for her. I mean, he should expect it right? If he didn't want to get threatened by a knife and beat up by some guy then he shouldn't have cheated. Simple.  :roll:

[Kayla 7,595]

This is so sad. I remember hearing about it and felt so awful. And what's even worse is there are people out there implying she "deserved" it for false reasons ("she cheated!") which we know to not be true, and people happy it happened simply because she's a ****star and for some reason people don't view them as people deserving of respect. Most people have s-x, ****stars just get paid for it. And surprise- not all of them are d--gged out bimbos with no sense of morals. 

 

"this is what you get if you date a p0rn star. I bet she's on d--gs, too. "

^ One of the most disgusting comments I've read on this site. Making assumptions about her life simply because she does something you don't personally approve of. I don't care how many times you've tried to twist your words around and "clarify" to make it seem like you actually give two ****s about the fact someone was horribly abused by a psycho- it's clear you're judgmental. (And to clarify: I get it- you have no sympathy for cheaters, and the whole argument about whether or not she should have "expected" this is moot because she didn't cheat, so I'm not here to jump into THAT conversation and try to debate any of those points. Just here to say that I find your attitude and general overall outlook of this situation and other things you've talked about to be disgusting.)

[SleepingSun 1,506]

I can't believe there are actually people who believe that cheating can justify physical violence. Also, some people here are extremely judgemental, it's not even funny. Get a reality check and come back when you realized how disrespectful you guys are. Disgusting, sick, psychotic. There is no way physical violence can be justified, it's one of the main reasons for lots of misery in our world.

[Jesse Pinkman 4,660]

So someone deserves to be raped and Damn near killed because thwy cheated? What kind of inhumane and barbaric mindset.

[Morphine Prince 109,838]

You're still a monster lucia.

[HANZ 4,380]

the girl was a b---h for cheatting on him

 

and the man was a monster for beating her like that

[Jjang 2,262]

Honey, calling someone ignorant means they lack awareness or knowledge of a particular situation. That only applies to you here. You're only capable of hopping onto the bandwagon of "hurrr the evil bad man is always bad!" without thinking for yourself (or being able to read properly). Bless your innocent, immature soul.

 

Or you're a cheater, in which case yeah you better watch out for the big bad War Machine! Rawrrrr. He's coming to getcha..he's coming to getcha!! *grabs your little nose*

 

This is not a case of "don't wear a s-xy outfit if you don't wanna get raped". This is a case of "don't go into the forest and hit a bear over the head with a wooden plank if you don't want to get attacked". I see your simple mind is unable to grasp such a complex situation. Maybe you should stop watching Disney movies to get a less black-and-white understanding of our world. 

 

 

+1

Who cheated on you sweetie

[Levine 23,973]

The pics of the girl are TRAGIC yet people are commenting with a "she deserves it".

I will never complain about bad comments on Gaga. 

 

Human beings are disgusting trash. 

[Cody Draco 2,531]

What is wrong with you? Can you read? I said I feel no sympathy for cheaters (justifiably) but that does not mean I condone his actions. In fact, I stated his punishment was too severe. However that still does not change the fact that I have no room in my heart to feel any form of sympathy towards these kinds of people. Don't want to get beat up by your boyfriend? Then don't cheat. Simple.

Having that said apparently he was her ex in which case he was the "bad guy" to use your terms.

I personally believe everyone has the right to cheat and they shouldn't be killed for it. He is in the wrong not her.

[Vernier 3,786]

I personally believe everyone has the right to cheat and they shouldn't be killed for it. He is in the wrong not her.

 

The phrasing of this sounded weird It made it sound like you meant everyone has the right to cheat. But I think you meant that everyone has the right to cheat without being killed for it?(I hope)