Teal Ambition 47,805 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Seriously. Some of these whiny brats who like to call everything basic probably won't even have enough to scrape together to buy the dollar store knockoff, Eau de Crazy Lady. EXACTLY! ▌│█║▌║▌║ before I am Canadian, I am Chromatican ║▌║▌║█│▌ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slayer 9,227 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Yeah, it's classy and expensive, but it's still called Eau De Gaga. Kind of takes away the class... I love judas SO MUCH but I canʹt look like a copycat of JLO!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levine 23,251 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Maybe that "Lady Gaga next project is hot as fire" means that there is fire in the commercial? It looks so good tho And I can't at you all saying she has no soul for making perfumes "just for money".... what else do they make products for? Jelly beans? Of course it's for money + it promotes her image (which is her brand). It's also a fashion project which Gaga obviously loves. They're so stupid Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davidsonary 925 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Reading that description of the perfume reminds me of the description of the ARTPOP era we got before the release of Applause. Oh hello. What is this space down here? Where am I? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valextra 58 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 I like it, it's classic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychedelic 1,098 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 It's so classy, yet that doesn't make it any less BASIC! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valextra 58 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 I want it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychedelic 1,098 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 I didn't buy the Fame, I doubt I'll get this one.... I like the name though! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hewkah 48 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 I don't mean to be rude, but as people have said, it's such a generic looking perfume. There's nothing about it. It is basic in every way possible. Not that I mind what it looks like, it's what it smells like that matters of course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 106,232 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 WAAAAAANT!!! :NOOO: 75 Ml, you're mine!!! :giveup: (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ 𝒪𝓁𝒹 𝑀𝒸𝒟𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒹 𝐿𝑜𝓈𝓉 𝐻𝒾𝓈 𝐹𝒶𝓇𝓂, 𝐿-𝑀-𝐹-𝒜-𝒪 (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houdini 103 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 The box is red :nooo: Marketing knows how to sell for me :emo: And what was a Fame for? She released Fame for our sins? of course it was for the money too but i don't know, it was the first one, she was exited, we were exited, it was well thinking-of, it was planned, there was a story line, a mysterious atmosphere, people were interested by it, it was more than a perfume, it was an idea, a proper line of new body product with an attitude. now it's a perfume to be a perfume. it looks like she said ''why i,m not putting a new one, i'm on tour, i have another album to come'' it just looks only for the marketing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,723 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Yeah don't call me honey. And alright if you say so, has the same look as the Chanel #5 bottle and that is the classiest most popular perfume in the whole world so you go on with your basic comments. All I'm saying is that I see Gaga as someone who would only put her name on something unique, and this doesn't strike me as something special. The absolute LAST thing I ever want to see Gaga do is PLAY IT SAFE, and that is what the SCREAMS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 96,075 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 of course it was for the money too but i don't know, it was the first one, she was exited, we were exited, it was well thinking-of, it was planned, there was a story line, a mysterious atmosphere, people were interested by it, it was more than a perfume, it was an idea, a proper line of new body product with an attitude. now it's a perfume to be a perfume. it looks like she said ''why i,m not putting a new one, i'm on tour, i have another album to come'' it just looks only for the marketing But the promo for it hasn't even started, how do you know its "atmosphere"? The perfume was literally just announced, calm down. If you see me posting like crazy, I'm either bored or procrastinating. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kermit the frog 1,895 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 I hope it comes in a version for broke b---hes too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenEyes 859 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 All I'm saying is that I see Gaga as someone who would only put her name on something unique, and this doesn't strike me as something special. The absolute LAST thing I ever want to see Gaga do is PLAY IT SAFE, and that is what the SCREAMS. Everything she does has to be unique? She can't be simple for once? She's always held to such a standard to everyone that she can never win. She has to be CRAZY She has to be DIFFERENT She has to be CLASSIER She has to be UNIQUE Which do you guys want? Right now she's in an era of music that is all about class and elegance. Everything has to fit into that look, and the bottle does that perfectly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.