RAMROD 117,543 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 This shiz is just getting real. :eww: (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ ˢᵖᵉᵉᵈ ᵃⁿᵈ ʷᵉⁱᵍʰᵗ (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socotra 3,357 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 He wants to reestablish the Russian Empire, or the Soviet Union, at the very least... and he's going to, unless someone steps up. Diplomacy doesn't work when you're dealing with crazies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qualle1 1,385 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 The entire Russian Government is a MESS. Putin is a real danger and has to be stopped. MAKE LOVE NOT WAR Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adakam 2 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 strengthening our nuclear deterrence forces thats important, and people should understand this phrase before looking at him like a madman nuclear deterrence, the mutual assured destruction theory, the more nuclear warfare power a country has, the less likely it is going to get attacked, and its less likely its going to ever be needed, if for example, the US throws even a single nuclear bomb, the US would be killing itself, as Russia would respond with a nuclear missile rain, and the same goes the other way around, if Russia attacks, at least once, the US would make it rain on Rusia. in other words, the more nuclear power the US and Rusia have, the less likely they are ever going to attack each other, unless they want the same fate on themselves fun fact, in the 70s, there was a glitch on rusian radars saying there was a full nuclear attack on the way, it was up to one man to decide if they should retaliate, but he followed his gut and didnt make the call to report it, he literally stopped a nuclear war that was going to be caused by a computer glitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kermit the frog 1,936 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 This shiz is just getting real. GETTING real? Do u realize that Russians already invaded Ukraine and there's a war going on in there? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 117,543 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 GETTING real? Do u realize that Russians already invaded Ukraine and there's a war going on in there? Now they threat to use nuke too (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ ˢᵖᵉᵉᵈ ᵃⁿᵈ ʷᵉⁱᵍʰᵗ (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bumblebee 2,528 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 He wants to reestablish the Russian Empire, or the Soviet Union, at the very least... and he's going to, unless someone steps up. Diplomacy doesn't work when you're dealing with crazies. But in what way is he trying to establish an empire? I am trying to speak with all the respect to you, but are people partly blind? There is a strong campaign in the media with the aim to portray Putin as the Darth Vader, but what is he really guilty for? Strangely, nobody gives a f*ck about all the mess the NATO countries have done in the recent years. The IRAQ invasion. Was it justified? How many of those banned weapons of mass destruction did they find? They simply bombed the f*ck out of the country, pretending to be searching for the weapons that have never been there. And people have swallowed it like it's not a big deal. And in UK there was even an investigation of the whole situation, the IRAQ INQUIRY. But the government vetoed the release of the documents (oh, what a shocker ). So technically it's OK to find a fake excuse for the invasion, and ten years later say: OK, we made a mistake, let's leave the country. And what is now happening in IRAQ? The building of the extremist state. Amazing. How about LIBYA? The NATO operation ended very successfully, they took down GADDAFI. Really cool. Has anybody tried to find out how the country is right now? I think once again, the world doesn't give a f*ck. Because LIBYA has "gradually descended into its current state of virtual anarchy". There are fights with the Islamic militant groups, but it's NATO - it couldn't do wrong. I don't even want to imagine what's going to happen to Afghanistan after the NATO troops leave the place. What I am trying to say: try to drop the stupid vision which is being projected on you by media and politicians. NATO is one of the messiest organizations ever. Putin is no saint, surely, but most of his actions are a response towards NATO and EU intentions in the regions close to his territory. When they (Russia) invaded Georgia, it was because Georgia president Mikheil Saakashvili decided to fight the so-called separatist within the Georgia territory from the blessing of the US government. Guess what's with him now? Mikheil Saakashvili has been put on the country's domestic wanted list. Basically he will be detained once he crosses the Georgian border by the Georgian government. With the Ukraine, it is even more simple. The EU wanted to sign the trade agreement with the government, and NATO is not against Ukraine joining the alliance. However, people prefer to ignore that almost half of the country is against the trade agreement with the EU and the alliance with NATO. Google the 2010 presidential elections in Ukraine, when pro-Russian Viktor Yanukovych candidate was against pro-European Yulia Tymoshenko candidate. The election outcome was 48.95% to 45.47% in popular vote. This is a very narrow proportion which is a strong sign of the fact that the country's population is non-homogeneous in its views. But the media want to you to view Ukrainians as a poor democratic society who wants to step away from big evil Putin. Gross. There are two different regions in the country, and when the south-eastern part of Ukraine decided to express its dissatisfaction with the strange change of power which took place in February (and it was not the most constitutional change of power which took place) the central government simply decided to tone the talks down by bombing the f*ck out of those regions. Oh what a familiar scheme So when the EU and NATO are pursuing their interests in the region so close to Russian borders he has to do something. I doubt the US government would hesitate if Russia launched the change of government power in Mexico. What I mean to say is doubt, inquire and search. Do not trust the media, cause these are the same media which launched a massive support campaign for the IRAQ invasion, for the LIBYA invasion, and look what happened to those countries. The truth is that Putin is neither evil nor saint, he just seems to be the only politician in the world who is not afraid to openly act against the US government. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc 4,776 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 GETTING real? Do u realize that Russians already invaded Ukraine and there's a war going on in there? Russia has no interest in the extremely poor oil-less East-Ukraine. They just want might there (like in Belarus), and they want to cause chaos in West-Ukraine and to further delay the joining of the EU+NATO by West-Ukraine. GDP per capita Donetsk: 4,590 USD Luhansk: 3,157 Zaporizhia: 3,472 Kherson: 2,140 for comparison's sake: Bangladesh 2,100 Korea, North 1,800 Congo, Rep. 4,800 Sudan 2,600 Yemen 2,500 It's basically a third-world country. Russia has no reason to have interests in it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc 4,776 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 But in what way is he trying to establish an empire? I am trying to speak with all the respect to you, but are people partly blind? There is a strong campaign in the media with the aim to portray Putin as the Darth Vader, but what is he really guilty for? Strangely, nobody gives a f*ck about all the mess the NATO countries have done in the recent years. The IRAQ invasion. Was it justified? How many of those banned weapons of mass destruction did they find? They simply bombed the f*ck out of the country, pretending to be searching for the weapons that have never been there. And people have swallowed it like it's not a big deal. And in UK there was even an investigation of the whole situation, the IRAQ INQUIRY. But the government vetoed the release of the documents (oh, what a shocker ). So technically it's OK to find a fake excuse for the invasion, and ten years later say: OK, we made a mistake, let's leave the country. And what is now happening in IRAQ? The building of the extremist state. Amazing. How about LIBYA? The NATO operation ended very successfully, they took down GADDAFI. Really cool. Has anybody tried to find out how the country is right now? I think once again, the world doesn't give a f*ck. Because LIBYA has "gradually descended into its current state of virtual anarchy". There are fights with the Islamic militant groups, but it's NATO - it couldn't do wrong. I don't even want to imagine what's going to happen to Afghanistan after the NATO troops leave the place. What I am trying to say: try to drop the stupid vision which is being projected on you by media and politicians. NATO is one of the messiest organizations ever. Putin is no saint, surely, but most of his actions are a response towards NATO and EU intentions in the regions close to his territory. When they (Russia) invaded Georgia, it was because Georgia president Mikheil Saakashvili decided to fight the so-called separatist within the Georgia territory from the blessing of the US government. Guess what's with him now? Mikheil Saakashvili has been put on the country's domestic wanted list. Basically he will be detained once he crosses the Georgian border by the Georgian government. With the Ukraine, it is even more simple. The EU wanted to sign the trade agreement with the government, and NATO is not against Ukraine joining the alliance. However, people prefer to ignore that almost half of the country is against the trade agreement with the EU and the alliance with NATO. Google the 2010 presidential elections in Ukraine, when pro-Russian Viktor Yanukovych candidate was against pro-European Yulia Tymoshenko candidate. The election outcome was 48.95% to 45.47% in popular vote. This is a very narrow proportion which is a strong sign of the fact that the country's population is non-homogeneous in its views. But the media want to you to view Ukrainians as a poor democratic society who wants to step away from big evil Putin. Gross. There are two different regions in the country, and when the south-eastern part of Ukraine decided to express its dissatisfaction with the strange change of power which took place in February (and it was not the most constitutional change of power which took place) the central government simply decided to tone the talks down by bombing the f*ck out of those regions. Oh what a familiar scheme So when the EU and NATO are pursuing their interests in the region so close to Russian borders he has to do something. I doubt the US government would hesitate if Russia launched the change of government power in Mexico. What I mean to say is doubt, inquire and search. Do not trust the media, cause these are the same media which launched a massive support campaign for the IRAQ invasion, for the LIBYA invasion, and look what happened to those countries. The truth is that Putin is neither evil nor saint, he just seems to be the only politician in the world who is not afraid to openly act against the US government. A majority is a majority. If 51% of the people in a country believe the country should join the EU, so be it. That's how a democracy works. The problem is that Putin wanted to put sanctions on Ukraine if it signed the EU trade agreement, which caused massive protests by pro-Europeans all over the country. Yes, I know that the US has its imperfections. But this is not the US vs. Russia. This is the world against Russia. Look at this map, which shows who are on the side of Russia not just the US, but also Europe, Latin America, Africa and Asia believe that what Russia is doing is wrong. I think the best for West-Ukraine would be to split from East-Ukraine and have a bigger majority that supports the EU, because that will eventually benefit West-Ukraine the most. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HANZ 4,380 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 he must die My Favs = Lady Gaga, Janet Jackson, Ricky Martin, AKB48 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swando 300 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 The fact that he even says this about Russia is sickening, nuclear weapons are not a joke, and should never have been made in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatislaps 34,854 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 The fact that he even says this about Russia is sickening, nuclear weapons are not a joke, and should never have been made in the first place. seriously someone who would use mass destruction weapons like atomic bombs, isn't fit to the role of leader. He is the first person I would put behind bars when it comes to the safety of world peace and the stability of the global market Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bye 3,947 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 Can't Putin just go after the IS and other religious extremist terrorists and they can kill each other off? That'd be swell, thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucia4 0 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 thats important, and people should understand this phrase before looking at him like a madman nuclear deterrence, the mutual assured destruction theory, the more nuclear warfare power a country has, the less likely it is going to get attacked, and its less likely its going to ever be needed, if for example, the US throws even a single nuclear bomb, the US would be killing itself, as Russia would respond with a nuclear missile rain, and the same goes the other way around, if Russia attacks, at least once, the US would make it rain on Rusia. in other words, the more nuclear power the US and Rusia have, the less likely they are ever going to attack each other, unless they want the same fate on themselves fun fact, in the 70s, there was a glitch on rusian radars saying there was a full nuclear attack on the way, it was up to one man to decide if they should retaliate, but he followed his gut and didnt make the call to report it, he literally stopped a nuclear war that was going to be caused by a computer glitch Wasn't that in the 80s? 1983? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucia4 0 Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 But in what way is he trying to establish an empire? I am trying to speak with all the respect to you, but are people partly blind? There is a strong campaign in the media with the aim to portray Putin as the Darth Vader, but what is he really guilty for? Strangely, nobody gives a f*ck about all the mess the NATO countries have done in the recent years. The IRAQ invasion. Was it justified? How many of those banned weapons of mass destruction did they find? They simply bombed the f*ck out of the country, pretending to be searching for the weapons that have never been there. And people have swallowed it like it's not a big deal. And in UK there was even an investigation of the whole situation, the IRAQ INQUIRY. But the government vetoed the release of the documents (oh, what a shocker ). So technically it's OK to find a fake excuse for the invasion, and ten years later say: OK, we made a mistake, let's leave the country. And what is now happening in IRAQ? The building of the extremist state. Amazing. How about LIBYA? The NATO operation ended very successfully, they took down GADDAFI. Really cool. Has anybody tried to find out how the country is right now? I think once again, the world doesn't give a f*ck. Because LIBYA has "gradually descended into its current state of virtual anarchy". There are fights with the Islamic militant groups, but it's NATO - it couldn't do wrong. I don't even want to imagine what's going to happen to Afghanistan after the NATO troops leave the place. What I am trying to say: try to drop the stupid vision which is being projected on you by media and politicians. NATO is one of the messiest organizations ever. Putin is no saint, surely, but most of his actions are a response towards NATO and EU intentions in the regions close to his territory. When they (Russia) invaded Georgia, it was because Georgia president Mikheil Saakashvili decided to fight the so-called separatist within the Georgia territory from the blessing of the US government. Guess what's with him now? Mikheil Saakashvili has been put on the country's domestic wanted list. Basically he will be detained once he crosses the Georgian border by the Georgian government. With the Ukraine, it is even more simple. The EU wanted to sign the trade agreement with the government, and NATO is not against Ukraine joining the alliance. However, people prefer to ignore that almost half of the country is against the trade agreement with the EU and the alliance with NATO. Google the 2010 presidential elections in Ukraine, when pro-Russian Viktor Yanukovych candidate was against pro-European Yulia Tymoshenko candidate. The election outcome was 48.95% to 45.47% in popular vote. This is a very narrow proportion which is a strong sign of the fact that the country's population is non-homogeneous in its views. But the media want to you to view Ukrainians as a poor democratic society who wants to step away from big evil Putin. Gross. There are two different regions in the country, and when the south-eastern part of Ukraine decided to express its dissatisfaction with the strange change of power which took place in February (and it was not the most constitutional change of power which took place) the central government simply decided to tone the talks down by bombing the f*ck out of those regions. Oh what a familiar scheme So when the EU and NATO are pursuing their interests in the region so close to Russian borders he has to do something. I doubt the US government would hesitate if Russia launched the change of government power in Mexico. What I mean to say is doubt, inquire and search. Do not trust the media, cause these are the same media which launched a massive support campaign for the IRAQ invasion, for the LIBYA invasion, and look what happened to those countries. The truth is that Putin is neither evil nor saint, he just seems to be the only politician in the world who is not afraid to openly act against the US government. Only disappointing thing about your post is that you're from Russian Federation... I was hoping that wouldn't be true as I was reading it but it is. Not saying you're lying but it makes your post less unbiased. :/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.