Jump to content
question

Albums with a misleading title/image/sound


Reject False Icons
 Share

Featured Posts

HotLikeMexico
7 minutes ago, elegidadedios said:

You are wrong but I don't blame you cause you're stuck with Alejandro in 2026. You will get it in 2040

But what does Alejandro have to do with this tho. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

elegidadedios
1 minute ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

But that’s just me, ig.

NO sis it's the reality get these bitches!!!

La Casa De Papel Shock GIF by NETFLIX

  • LMAO 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

elegidadedios
1 minute ago, HotLikeMexico said:

But what does Alejandro have to do with this tho. 

Well, it has everything to do with this if you think about it. Give it a second thought ❤️

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ultimecia
15 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

I just don’t really see MAYHEM as being any more shallow than the bulk of her discography, tbh. Her music, on her face, has never been especially deep and I think most the depth folks read into it tends to come from the way she adds layers thru stage performance, MVs, and her own supplemental interpretations. But that’s just me, ig.

I think we've discussed that exact point before, and I don't disagree that most of Gaga's substance lies in her performances and visuals.

Here's my issue with MAYHEM's lyrics, there is for example a huge difference between how the word "monster" is used in the song of the same name, compared to how it is used in "Kill For Love."

One has weight and symbolism, the other is void of any substance to me.

She's throwing around the words werewolf, zombie, ghost etc. in a "Monster Mash" way, and not in a "dark poetry" way.

Time. It will not wait, no matter how hard you hold on...
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ladle Ghoulash
2 minutes ago, Ultimecia said:

"dark poetry" way.

Yeah, I disagree with the “dark poetry” framing, but I ultimately like the album, so I don’t hold that specific incongruity against her. She’s inappropriately used the term “poetry” to discuss her lyrics throughout her career so I always take that with a massive grain of salt lol

We have forgotten our public MANNERS
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

imogen2133
2 hours ago, Ultimecia said:

I think we've discussed that exact point before, and I don't disagree that most of Gaga's substance lies in her performances and visuals.

Here's my issue with MAYHEM's lyrics, there is for example a huge difference between how the word "monster" is used in the song of the same name, compared to how it is used in "Kill For Love."

One has weight and symbolism, the other is void of any substance to me.

She's throwing around the words werewolf, zombie, ghost etc. in a "Monster Mash" way, and not in a "dark poetry" way.

Don't ever compare Mayhem to the masterpiece that is The Monster Mash:neyde:

  • Shook 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

imogen2133
3 hours ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

I just don’t really see MAYHEM as being any more shallow than the bulk of her discography, tbh. Her music, on her face, has never been especially deep and I think most the depth folks read into it tends to come from the way she adds layers thru stage performance, MVs, and her own supplemental interpretations. But that’s just me, ig.

Ok a few things first of all I don't see the point of saying "but all of her albums are shallow though" because 1. That doesn't make Mayhem any better and doesn't access the quality of it on it's own and 2. I don't think that is true. Gaga has plenty of songs with deeper meanings especially on her earlier albums (Speechless, Dope, Bloody Mary, Government Hooker, Grigio Girls, The Fame, I Like It Rough, SHICD, Marry The Night, Replay, Swine, DWUW) but I think Gaga's best strengths as a songwriter have always been in her storytelling and her ability to flesh out simplistic ideas using metaphors or complex lyrics like Bad Romance, Judas, Poker Face, Applause, Paparazzi, Just Dance, Monster and Lovegame for example all have simplistic meanings which is fine not every song has to be super deep to be good but it is the way she writes the songs and fleshes out the ideas to be more complex or unique to her that make her great. I also agree with what you have said before that she tends to fully flesh out her song ideas in her visuals or recontextualize them to have new meanings and that is great (Telephone video, Paparazzi video, Disease video etc.) but I would not use that to say that the original songs meanings are shallow.

 

Also there is nothing inherently wrong with more simplistic songs with simplistic meanings/lyrics that don't delve too far into the idea/explore much or flesh out the concept which is in many of the songs on Mayhem I just think Gaga can (and has) done better is all. Also what you have said before about the songs on Mayhem being about Gaga's fame and her personal relationship with her "Gaga self", I think it is a bit of a reach personally and is really only found explicitly on Abracadabra, SOAM, PC and The Beast. I think VIY, LD, Zombieboy, Killah, HBDUWM, DCT, KFL,BOG and DWAS are mostly just love songs or about partying and that is it. I mean Gaga has sang about these topics before on other albums and sang about topics that are typically sung about in pop like love, romance, sex, partying and drugs, she just usually has a more interesting and fleshed out way of writing about them, for example Bloody Mary (a love song) is about Mary Magdalene being both spiritually divine and also fully human and how Mary must have wept but also needed to be strong and carry on Jesus's teachings after his death and Monster which takes an idea Gaga previously explored on BR (falling in love with the bad boy) and fleshes it out more with her singing about a predatory man who has fully consumed her heart and mind and one that clearly takes advantage of her (also shows Gaga's great storytelling as well). I mean what you said about most of the songs on Mayhem actually being about Gaga's relationship with her persona is similar to Gaga saying "It wasnt love it was a perfect illusion" is about social media (which is ridiculous and requires massive reaching). Don't get me wrong there are songs that have good writing (Disease, Abra, GOE) but not many really and I would say overall it is pretty weak lyrically and doesn't fit the "gothic dreams" framing she gave either.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HotLikeMexico
3 hours ago, elegidadedios said:

Well, it has everything to do with this if you think about it. Give it a second thought ❤️

GhQW4O1WIAAj3mp.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ladle Ghoulash
17 minutes ago, imogen2133 said:

but all of her albums are shallow though

I didn’t say that. I said I don’t think MAYHEM is uniquely shallow and that you could essentially critique a lot of her other work for being in some way shallow (even if I don’t necessarily think it is). 

That being said, we’ve discussed this at length and it strikes me that you and I have fundamentally different styles of interpretation and interpretations of MAYHEM, so I’d rather leave it here that rehash the same argument again.

We have forgotten our public MANNERS
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

KevinWright

I have to mention Troye Sivan and Sam Smith.

Something to Give Each Other and Gloria had nothing to do with the lead singles, Rush and Unholy and ofc with their album covers. I expected some slutty gay anthems and we get some mediocre songs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...