Lizzo Responds To Viral "Lady In Blue MOVE!" Video

[Ladle Ghoulash 46,157]

Just now, River said:

she's not black

Says who?  Have you heard No? She’s serving hood fish the house down BOOTS! Rachel Dolezal could NEVAAAA

 

[River 125,194]

Just now, Ladle Ghoulash said:

People also hate her for that, tbf. They both have one cardinal sin in common (bad music), but people have to couch their disinterest in their bad music in secondary arguments because they need to feel morally superior for Not Liking the Person Who Makes Bad Music.

but she's more "likable" for most, she's the ugly duckling who became one of the cool kids

[Bronco 21,762]

4 minutes ago, loveandpeace said:

I only remember her making a tiktok implying that the Epstein files were fake 

I mean they are.

They've withheld the important information about the people involved lol 

[River 125,194]

Just now, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Says who?  Have you heard No? She’s serving hood fish the house down BOOTS! Rachel Dolezal could NEVAAAA

 

I will not listen to this, I lived 10 years of my life dodging her songs after all about the base 

[Hydrangea 7,278]

37 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Like a wooden shoe thrown by a lady in blue, you hear the last few words of your life…

With a haunting thought your dancers have you in court it’s time to cast your plea of the night 

[Ladle Ghoulash 46,157]

2 minutes ago, Bronco said:

I mean they are.

They've withheld the important information about the people involved lol 

I mean, idk if that means they’re “fake” so much as they’re being withheld, but I also don’t really know what she actually said tbf

Edited Friday at 04:48 PM by Ladle Ghoulash

[Ladle Ghoulash 46,157]

1 minute ago, Hydrangea said:

With a haunting thought your dancers have you in court it’s time to cast your plea of the night 

Did you assault them?

You say “Oo-nah-nah!”

Did you fat shame ha?

”No, sir, would nevaaaa”

Edited Friday at 04:48 PM by Ladle Ghoulash

[loveandpeace 423]

2 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Says who?  Have you heard No? She’s serving hood fish the house down BOOTS! Rachel Dolezal could NEVAAAA

 

[Bronco 21,762]

1 minute ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

I mean, idk if that means they’re “fake” so much as they’re being withheld, but I also don’t really know what she actually said tbf

I more so mean fake in the sense. They've released a **** tonne of nothing burger papers while openly and honestly withholding incriminating information. So what's in the public domain is deliberately chosen stuff they believed they could get away with or distract with.

And yeah idk what she said.

[Hydrangea 7,278]

Just now, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Did you assault them?

You say “Oo-nah-nah!”

Did you fat shame ha?

”No, sir, would nevaaaa”

Stick a banana 

in her va China?

[loveandpeace 423]

2 minutes ago, Bronco said:

I more so mean fake in the sense. They've released a **** tonne of nothing burger papers while openly and honestly withholding incriminating information. So what's in the public domain is deliberately chosen stuff they believed they could get away with or distract with.

And yeah idk what she said.

https://www.justjared.com/2026/02/04/lizzo-deletes-tiktok-video-about-jay-z-epstein-files-amid-backlash/

“Like, y’all are falling for it. It’s the easiest, oldest trick in the book. And honestly, I’m losing faith in the average intelligence of the American person. Because, come on, just because somebody’s name is mentioned in a 3 million document file of a person’s life who’s been lived over a span of crimes who span decades, doesn’t mean that every single person isn’t an accomplice,” Lizzo continued.

Edited Friday at 04:52 PM by loveandpeace

[Ladle Ghoulash 46,157]

1 minute ago, loveandpeace said:

https://www.justjared.com/2026/02/04/lizzo-deletes-tiktok-video-about-jay-z-epstein-files-amid-backlash/

So what’s tricky here is that what she said isn’t technically wrong: Jay Z’s name does appear on an FBI crisis intake sheet related to allegations that he SA’d someone at an Epstein party alongside Weinstein, but as of rn, those allegations are legally unverified (has not been investigated or corroborated by an investigation). Not really wise of her to come forward to try to discredit them wholesale, but it’s also understandable that she’d push back on something that people accepted as undeniably true without full evidence. 

[TheOriginalOne 11,416]

The way Gaga is the only person to look good with bleached eyebrows 

[nATAH 55,292]

53 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

I mean, idk about the sexual misconduct allegations, but folks really are largely dogpiling because consensus turned on her as soon as the allegations were dropped.
 

“She’s a hypocrite for weigh shaming her dancers!”

*weight shaming allegations dropped because they weren’t substantiated by dancer’s account of the event*
 

*Crickets from the GP*
 

”She’s a hypocrite for shaming the mental health of her dancers!”

*claim also dropped because it’s not meaningfully substantiated*
 

*Crickets from the GP*

I’m not even a fan by any means, but I mean, c’mon now…

tbf her teams defence was she made them do it for creative reasons, basically admitting to it

[Teletubby 160,225]

1 hour ago, loveandpeace said:

https://www.justjared.com/2026/02/04/lizzo-deletes-tiktok-video-about-jay-z-epstein-files-amid-backlash/

“Like, y’all are falling for it. It’s the easiest, oldest trick in the book. And honestly, I’m losing faith in the average intelligence of the American person. Because, come on, just because somebody’s name is mentioned in a 3 million document file of a person’s life who’s been lived over a span of crimes who span decades, doesn’t mean that every single person isn’t an accomplice,” Lizzo continued.

Lizzo was defending Jay-Z only because she is Beyonce's fan and hoped it will go viral and Beyonce notice her