Ladle Ghoulash 51,515 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 Just now, River said: she's not black Says who? Have you heard No? She’s serving hood fish the house down BOOTS! Rachel Dolezal could NEVAAAA We have forgotten our public MANNERS 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 126,901 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 Just now, Ladle Ghoulash said: People also hate her for that, tbf. They both have one cardinal sin in common (bad music), but people have to couch their disinterest in their bad music in secondary arguments because they need to feel morally superior for Not Liking the Person Who Makes Bad Music. but she's more "likable" for most, she's the ugly duckling who became one of the cool kids So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco 24,066 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 4 minutes ago, loveandpeace said: I only remember her making a tiktok implying that the Epstein files were fake I mean they are. They've withheld the important information about the people involved lol The gays know how to party 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 126,901 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 Just now, Ladle Ghoulash said: Says who? Have you heard No? She’s serving hood fish the house down BOOTS! Rachel Dolezal could NEVAAAA I will not listen to this, I lived 10 years of my life dodging her songs after all about the base So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydrangea 7,781 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 37 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: Like a wooden shoe thrown by a lady in blue, you hear the last few words of your life… With a haunting thought your dancers have you in court it’s time to cast your plea of the night Looking down at my $t loser misery Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 51,515 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Bronco said: I mean they are. They've withheld the important information about the people involved lol I mean, idk if that means they’re “fake” so much as they’re being withheld, but I also don’t really know what she actually said tbf Edited May 22 by Ladle Ghoulash We have forgotten our public MANNERS 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 51,515 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 (edited) 1 minute ago, Hydrangea said: With a haunting thought your dancers have you in court it’s time to cast your plea of the night Did you assault them? You say “Oo-nah-nah!” Did you fat shame ha? ”No, sir, would nevaaaa” Edited May 22 by Ladle Ghoulash We have forgotten our public MANNERS 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loveandpeace 1,552 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 2 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: Says who? Have you heard No? She’s serving hood fish the house down BOOTS! Rachel Dolezal could NEVAAAA just smile :) ♡🦋⬇️ 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco 24,066 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 1 minute ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: I mean, idk if that means they’re “fake” so much as they’re being withheld, but I also don’t really know what she actually said tbf I more so mean fake in the sense. They've released a **** tonne of nothing burger papers while openly and honestly withholding incriminating information. So what's in the public domain is deliberately chosen stuff they believed they could get away with or distract with. And yeah idk what she said. The gays know how to party 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydrangea 7,781 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 Just now, Ladle Ghoulash said: Did you assault them? You say “Oo-nah-nah!” Did you fat shame ha? ”No, sir, would nevaaaa” Stick a banana in her va China? Looking down at my $t loser misery Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loveandpeace 1,552 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Bronco said: I more so mean fake in the sense. They've released a **** tonne of nothing burger papers while openly and honestly withholding incriminating information. So what's in the public domain is deliberately chosen stuff they believed they could get away with or distract with. And yeah idk what she said. https://www.justjared.com/2026/02/04/lizzo-deletes-tiktok-video-about-jay-z-epstein-files-amid-backlash/ “Like, y’all are falling for it. It’s the easiest, oldest trick in the book. And honestly, I’m losing faith in the average intelligence of the American person. Because, come on, just because somebody’s name is mentioned in a 3 million document file of a person’s life who’s been lived over a span of crimes who span decades, doesn’t mean that every single person isn’t an accomplice,” Lizzo continued. Edited May 22 by loveandpeace just smile :) ♡🦋⬇️ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 51,515 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 1 minute ago, loveandpeace said: https://www.justjared.com/2026/02/04/lizzo-deletes-tiktok-video-about-jay-z-epstein-files-amid-backlash/ So what’s tricky here is that what she said isn’t technically wrong: Jay Z’s name does appear on an FBI crisis intake sheet related to allegations that he SA’d someone at an Epstein party alongside Weinstein, but as of rn, those allegations are legally unverified (has not been investigated or corroborated by an investigation). Not really wise of her to come forward to try to discredit them wholesale, but it’s also understandable that she’d push back on something that people accepted as undeniably true without full evidence. We have forgotten our public MANNERS 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOriginalOne 11,560 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 The way Gaga is the only person to look good with bleached eyebrows 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nATAH 56,503 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 53 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: I mean, idk about the sexual misconduct allegations, but folks really are largely dogpiling because consensus turned on her as soon as the allegations were dropped. “She’s a hypocrite for weigh shaming her dancers!” *weight shaming allegations dropped because they weren’t substantiated by dancer’s account of the event* *Crickets from the GP* ”She’s a hypocrite for shaming the mental health of her dancers!” *claim also dropped because it’s not meaningfully substantiated* *Crickets from the GP* I’m not even a fan by any means, but I mean, c’mon now… tbf her teams defence was she made them do it for creative reasons, basically admitting to it mother, what must i do? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorSwift 161,957 Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 1 hour ago, loveandpeace said: https://www.justjared.com/2026/02/04/lizzo-deletes-tiktok-video-about-jay-z-epstein-files-amid-backlash/ “Like, y’all are falling for it. It’s the easiest, oldest trick in the book. And honestly, I’m losing faith in the average intelligence of the American person. Because, come on, just because somebody’s name is mentioned in a 3 million document file of a person’s life who’s been lived over a span of crimes who span decades, doesn’t mean that every single person isn’t an accomplice,” Lizzo continued. Lizzo was defending Jay-Z only because she is Beyonce's fan and hoped it will go viral and Beyonce notice her https://store.taylorswift.com Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.