innuendo141 52 Posted Wednesday at 07:10 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 07:10 AM Proper form - and it was likely just Apple taking the credits straight from Mayhem rather than an intentional act. Benefit of the doubt given, but this one would have left a slightly bad taste in my mouth for something that is otherwise flawless. The cosmic ballet, goes on. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpmMonkey 7,390 Posted Wednesday at 07:13 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 07:13 AM (edited) 54 minutes ago, Guillaume Hamon said: Now it looks like they tried to see if they could hide it and did things fairly once they had to. You make them sound like it was a malicious act of them to "hide" their inspiration. Like, what do you assume she or her team would gain from not crediting? Rather than trying to create drama where none is on her end we could just ignore the fact they probably just forgot to hand in papers in time so proper crediting was possible. Gaga masterfully scheming some random musician, told by some of y'all: Edited Wednesday at 07:15 AM by bpmMonkey saving people, hunting things - the family business Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guillaume Hamon 6,883 Posted Wednesday at 08:45 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 08:45 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, bpmMonkey said: You make them sound like it was a malicious act of them to "hide" their inspiration. They do it themselves actually. By crediting these guys after the polemic popped. 1 hour ago, bpmMonkey said: Like, what do you assume she or her team would gain from not crediting? Possibly money if they can avoid to share royalties. Or just looking better by not admitting you borrowed bits from other artists to make your own art but Gaga's cool with admitting her influences so I doubt it could be that here. Probably money. 1 hour ago, bpmMonkey said: Rather than trying to create drama The drama is there since Kavinsky tweet tbh so it's not me creating it. 1 hour ago, bpmMonkey said: where none is on her end I've been saying X times in this thread it's not on her end but rather up to her team since she apparently doesn't follow the legal business part too much. 1 hour ago, bpmMonkey said: we could just ignore the fact they probably just forgot to hand in papers in time so proper crediting was possible. C'mon it's not about a late signature lol. Even before the papers are done you're supposed to ask permission and they didn't bother with it neither since he learned it once it was out. 1 hour ago, bpmMonkey said: Gaga masterfully scheming some random musician, told by some of y'all: Didn't say it was "gaga scheming" lmao. I said it was her team either doing so or just not gaf which is nasty too. Be real, if Gaga was like " they could have ask before to sell something with my music in it " over some project, EVERYONE on ggd would make no excuses and immediately say it's not respectful at best if not fishy. Edited Wednesday at 08:45 AM by Guillaume Hamon Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.