Trump eyes ousting Tulsi Gabbard next

[AsleepOnTheCeiling 6,939]

11 minutes ago, Bronco said:

I genuinely think sexism plays a part. 

He lets men get away with the same stupidity he fires the women for. 

But he laughs when the men are stupid and gets irritated by the women. 

Quite possible. I think Bondi and Noem were generally the most disliked by the public too and that's a pretty big reason given that he loves his approval ratings. But Gabbard doesn't make sense in that vein of thinking cause she's been too low-key with the public and Trash is probably the most unpopular of them all. 

[Bronco 24,796]

5 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Yes and no, tbh. Trump 1.0 had more male cabinet officials fired and replaced than women. The fact of the matter is that the women in charge of DHS and DOJ oversaw two of the biggest liabilities of his second term and he just needs to save face atp (and wouldn’t be surprised if Hegseth weren’t next, tbh).

Definitely don't think its the only reason. But I do believe he gives the women less wiggle room. 

Like Bessnett has walked the same line of avoiding support without providing criticism as Tulsi Gabbard has for example. 

 

[Ladle Ghoulash 52,526]

18 minutes ago, Bronco said:

Definitely don't think its the only reason. But I do believe he gives the women less wiggle room. 

Like Bessnett has walked the same line of avoiding support without providing criticism as Tulsi Gabbard has for example. 

 

The only scandal I could think of that differentiates Bessent and Gabbard is there was a whistleblower report that came out maybe a month ago that was so highly classified that only a handful of people could see it that implicated Gabbard in compromising national security, but I do agree that her firing feels more random relative to Noem and Bondi just because any problems she’s had haven’t been as high salience, so there’s less public pressure to oust her.

[Morphine Prince 109,648]

All that selling out for nothing LMAOO 

[AsleepOnTheCeiling 6,939]

36 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

All that selling out for nothing LMAOO 

Gabbard has been a sell out for most of her career, which is why I believe a lot of voters never liked her. 

[Franch Toast 27,737]

I thought KKKaroline Leavitt was next, but they both can go. 

 

[skaxboy 6,899]

5 hours ago, princedeeblebleble said:

Why is he getting rid of only the ladies thou?

Token women. But as the kids say “tokens get spent.”

[Ladle Ghoulash 52,526]

7 hours ago, PartySick said:

He's keeping them in other positions. 

The men, like sec. of defense Pete Hegseth, are gonna be the fall guys.

I don’t think he’s keeping any of them, as far as I can tell. The post about Bondi being ousted said she was moving to the “private sector,” which would be outside of the government.

[27monster27 15,848]

Tulsi Gabbard is a DINO pick-me. Good riddance that she is gonna be gone.

Yes, there of course is correct reasoning to view this as sexism since mostly women are getting fired, but I don't feel sorry for any of them like @HotLikeMexico said. As pick-mes they chose to sell themselves out to hurt their fellow women by supporting a movement that has amplified r@pe culture. I don't have to and don't plan on feeling any sorrow for them. Put in the effort to take accountability and fix what you've done, and just maybe you can have a shot at some remorse like Ashley St Clair.