StrawberryBlond 15,257 Posted Thursday at 03:56 AM Share Posted Thursday at 03:56 AM Thought she'd censored it with Lana's face and thought the fandom was about to go crazy! Was that an April Fools Day joke on your part? That's totally wild she did that but has it been taken down now? I don't see any evidence of it when I go to her page. How much was she showing? Was it completely uncensored? 47 minutes ago, Ultimecia said: People being uneasy about genitals showing within an artistic context should never visit a museum. They would faint. Most of us are totally fine with artistic nudity but it's got to be in the right situations and with consent present. It has to be on an appropriate platform and you have to know what you're getting yourself into. Instagram is a social media site for displaying photos and it has guidelines. To post nudity there is a violation of their policies and it's disrespectful of those who don't want to see that. If you want to post nudes, there's a plethora of adult sites you can use. It's all about respect and consent. If there isn't, you're just being a flasher. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 114,396 Posted Thursday at 04:07 AM Author Share Posted Thursday at 04:07 AM 10 minutes ago, StrawberryBlond said: Thought she'd censored it with Lana's face and thought the fandom was about to go crazy! Was that an April Fools Day joke on your part? Neither. I censored it cos GGD don't allowed explicit images (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ goddamn this noise inside my head (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
onionring 641 Posted Thursday at 04:25 AM Share Posted Thursday at 04:25 AM (edited) 56 minutes ago, timdrake said: I see what you’re saying, but that does kind of minimize some folks who use bluesky as an outlet to post their art without the restrictions that a platform like instagram has in place personally I just think it’s tacky to post 🍆 and balls (or holes, or titties) on instagram 🤷🏻♂️ I mean I even judge my friends who post 🍆 in their close friends stories and then whine when they get suspended. it’s just a weird venue for it they’re fine photos, but it’s only a matter of time before meta takes them down and renders this whole thing moot Was not my intention to diminish artists on bluesky at all, I'm just saying if the intended msg was to highlight her body for trans visibility day it kinda sends a stronger massage and is more punk to post it where there's guidelines in place against it, I think that's the whole point (?) Honestly I think those guidelines are weird as hell my ig feed is already filled with thirst traps and queer phallic art like it's just bodies but I understand that's a bigger discussion to get into rn, anyway there are infact existing guidelines and we all checked that little box so I concede , the post will be taken down soon enough and she made her point and that's that. It just felt very intentional and harmless and in this day and age I think we're missing that and her body is tea af. Edited Thursday at 04:27 AM by onionring 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Boy 3,453 Posted Thursday at 04:37 AM Share Posted Thursday at 04:37 AM Ethel’s Cain. 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MACATL 1,930 Posted Thursday at 04:44 AM Share Posted Thursday at 04:44 AM 2 hours ago, Ultimecia said: The pictures are gorgeous, they make for a very powerful way to celebrate trans visibility day. Her body is just as beautiful and worthy of being displayed in an artistic manner as anyone else's. What does it accomplish is the big picture exactly? Are those that are transphobic suddenly going to see the light because someone decided to show their junk on Insta? Seems more like an attention grab to me. 2 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Mayhem 3,158 Posted Thursday at 05:10 AM Share Posted Thursday at 05:10 AM I thought Instagram was HELLA strict about nudity...im honestly shocked. Insta is now just like X Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luv u Sum 2,437 Posted Thursday at 05:27 AM Share Posted Thursday at 05:27 AM that's hot 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco 18,833 Posted Thursday at 05:48 AM Share Posted Thursday at 05:48 AM I'm fine with artistic nudity, and have zero issue with anyone's body being displayed. But instagram has a minimum user age requirement of 13, and minimal content filters/safeguards to prevent anyone of any age seeing NSFW content (artistic or sexual) prior to any moderation action removing the content. I don't think this is an appropriate post for instagram as a result. The gays know how to party 10 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVeryGagaHolyDick 29,368 Posted Thursday at 06:56 AM Share Posted Thursday at 06:56 AM How did Instagram not censor this? I’ve been banned for much less than that on an account with zero followers 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwistedTeeth 2,474 Posted Thursday at 07:25 AM Share Posted Thursday at 07:25 AM 5 hours ago, TheARTPOPball said: Idk. Why are we posting our genitals on instagram? Idk. Why aren't we posting our genitals on the ol' IG? CHOMP. 7 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobina 3,246 Posted Thursday at 07:32 AM Share Posted Thursday at 07:32 AM She really said, "It's trans visibility day, so it's gonna be VISIBLE!" "634 blowjobs in 5 days. I'm really quite tired." 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 123,410 Posted Thursday at 07:50 AM Share Posted Thursday at 07:50 AM 4 hours ago, Ultimecia said: People being uneasy about genitals showing within an artistic context should never visit a museum. They would faint. In 2023 in Florida a school principal had to resign because the parents accused his for sharing p-rnographic content with the students - the statue of David So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy 4 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheARTPOPball 1,170 Posted Thursday at 07:55 AM Share Posted Thursday at 07:55 AM 5 hours ago, ALGAYDO said: If the post was sexual in nature, I’d be raising an eyebrow too, but there’s no real sexual undertones at all, it’s fine I mean true but full frontal nudity on an app with its youngest users being 13? I guess anything goes these days lmao 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimotheeChalamet 6,630 Posted Thursday at 07:59 AM Share Posted Thursday at 07:59 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, AVeryGagaHolyDick said: How did Instagram not censor this? That's M-O-N-E-Y, so sexy I Edited Thursday at 08:02 AM by TimotheeChalamet 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco 18,833 Posted Thursday at 07:59 AM Share Posted Thursday at 07:59 AM 8 minutes ago, River said: In 2023 in Florida a school principal had to resign because the parents accused his for sharing p-rnographic content with the students - the statue of David Isn't that the plot of a 90s simpsons episode? The gays know how to party 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.