We hate Chappell now?

[MadArchitect 1,362]

Just now, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Saying that he’s not part of her detail if he is is a false claim lol

i know, but you said it like there was a third party conflict of interest in false information that might cause contention, there isn't, it's just chappel's team and that individual security guard, which can be fixed with ease with paid PR, there is low risk of anything blowing up in their face if there isn't a third party...

[Ladle Ghoulash 38,586]

4 minutes ago, MadArchitect said:

i know, but you said it like there was a third party conflict of interest in false information that might cause contention, there isn't, it's just chappel's team and that individual security guard, which can be fixed with ease with paid PR, there is low risk of anything blowing up in their face if there isn't a third party...

Could be independently looked into (ie “if not Chappell, who was he representing or what org sent him” etc) and deduced from there. 

Edited Thursday at 04:39 PM by Ladle Ghoulash

[MadArchitect 1,362]

7 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Could be independently looked into (ie “if not Chappell, who was he representing or what org sent him” etc) and deduced from there. 

yes, and he purpusefully ignored that and left that kind of info unaddressed, i think there is not really a way to know other than him, he's a private security guard

Edited Thursday at 04:46 PM by MadArchitect

[Ladle Ghoulash 38,586]

21 hours ago, MadArchitect said:

yes, and he purpusefully ignored that and left that kind of info unaddressed, i think there is not really a way to know other than him, he's a private security guard

Oh well. Happy to see this non-story die down anyway, tbh.

[Togekiss 2,752]

5 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Oh well. Happy to see this non-story die down anyway, tbh.

The ridiculous vitriol over this asinine story makes me like and want to support CR more honestly 

[Psyduck 1,663]

I don't hate her.
I still listen to Good Luck, Babe. 

She's reaping what she sows. 
I don't feel anything about the backlash. She's still rich lol.

[PartySick 168,632]

23 hours ago, MadArchitect said:

yeah just looked him up and his original post, a notorious security guard hired by the highest profile celebs like kim kardashian or kanye west, claims he was there in behalf of another person, yet went out of his way to chastise a kid for approaching Chappel, with information that he allegedly got from the hotel? like wtf? why would he go to hotel security to get information as private celeb guard that wasn't even there for chappel to alert about a kid that smiled at her? it does not add up at all, he claims he takes full responsability yet also shifts the blame on the hotel, unknown "events" he witness days prior and "security risks" all to... chastise an 11 yo kid? the post is also so impersonal and unclarifying, reeks paid PR, just as chappel response...

I totally see a world where security at a hotel goes inappropriately overboard to "protect" a VIP guest tbh.

[MadArchitect 1,362]

15 hours ago, PartySick said:

I totally see a world where security at a hotel goes inappropriately overboard to "protect" a VIP guest tbh.

Yes, but maybe as you said if he was part of the security of the hotel, employed to look after the people on the place, but that's not the case, he's a private security guard who was there to look after another individual person, like why go above and beyond for somebody that's not even your client, and looking over information and surveillance to protect her? a worker working for free for a rich celeb btw, in what world? i crackle imagining his actual employer being paid dust while he goes looking information to chastise a child about Chappel lmao...

[PartySick 168,632]

1 hour ago, MadArchitect said:

Yes, but maybe as you said if he was part of the security of the hotel, employed to look after the people on the place, but that's not the case, he's a private security guard who was there to look after another individual person, like why go above and beyond for somebody that's not even your client, and looking over information and surveillance to protect her? a worker working for free for a rich celeb btw, in what world? i crackle imagining his actual employer being paid dust while he goes looking information to chastise a child about Chappel lmao...

Oh, was this the case? I admit I don't care enough to actually look that deep

Yeah idk

[LGAte 522]

It’s too bad she didn’t release more music. Gaga had a legendary line of hits from multiple eras before her hate train rolled in at ARTPOP. 
 

she has like 3 hits and a singular album.

[Bronco 18,623]

20 hours ago, PartySick said:

I totally see a world where security at a hotel goes inappropriately overboard to "protect" a VIP guest tbh.

I also see a world where a security gaurd scolds a rich kid who in return has a tantrum to mummy and the mummy then goes mad because how dare the staff speak to her child. 

Like is Chappell a known diva? Yes.

Are all rich kids brats? Yes.

Are all wealthy parents trash? Yes.

[Ladle Ghoulash 38,586]

3 hours ago, PartySick said:

Oh, was this the case? I admit I don't care enough to actually look that deep

Yeah idk

Yeah, everything I’ve learned about this has more or less been against my will and I like Chappell 

[thedirtymonster 780]

Never really liked her, but I’m not gonna yuck someone else’s yum. The world is big enough. Just wish she was a little nicer to people. Goes back to how she was raised, and it seems like she was a spoiled rich brat.

[robotvoiceinalice 2,006]

she is kinda problematic 

[AsleepOnTheCeiling 6,768]

On 3/25/2026 at 6:55 PM, Juanjo said:

Absolutely. Everybody deserves privacy,  but privacy means a very different thing when you’re known by millions of people. It’s the price of fame, and she wants to ignore this fact. 

Imo this is the same argument as "This is the price gay people pay for being out and proud" when they get homophobic comments on their social media or in public. Like we all know we'd get hate from individuals for posting the things we do even if it's as simple as wearing an outfit not generally acceptable within gender norms. That doesn't make us any less deserving of basic human decency. And the problem isn't with the individual but society. We really just need to stop abdicating responsibility as a society and saying "it's how it works" because it simply shouldn't. You're not owed any less respect or decency as a human being because of the life you choose to live, you're still allowed boundaries. Allow people to exist within the world. 

On 3/26/2026 at 2:02 AM, Guillaume Hamon said:

I remember Gaga at the peak of her fame in 2011 saying that celebs saying they couldn't escape the paps were "full of sh * t " cause they would never find her when she wanted to.

She attracted paps way more than Chappell does now so I would take her word. I think celebs complaining about paps can be very real just like an easy buzz gain with them being more in power than they'll admit. 

Gaga also never made headlines for her diva behavior towards paparazzi. Surely we wouldn't be surprised to find out paparazzi look for Chappell harder because they're attempting to fish for a crash out and viral moment from her. I'm not someone that normally pulls the "gender card" but we've never seen such a big deal made about how Justin Bieber crashed out on paparazzi. Somehow that was seen as a boy that was exploited by the industry. We never saw this hate when Kanye cussed out paparazzi. That was a man defending his family. But Britney does it and she's crazy, Chappell does it and she's a evil diva and bitch. 

Edited 11 hours ago by AsleepOnTheCeiling